Performance Analysis of Top Five Equity, Hybrid, and Debt Mutual Funds in India: A Five-Year Study (2020-2025)

This study analyzes the performance of the top five mutual funds in the equity, hybrid, and debt categories in India over the past five years (2020-2025). This study aims to provide insights into the risk-return dynamics, fund management strategies, and market trends that have influenced the performance of these funds. This study employs an analytical approach based on secondary data sourced from various financial databases and mutual fund websites. The top five funds in each category were selected based on their 5-year annualized returns as of March 2025. The analysis reveals that equity funds, particularly those focused on small-cap and sectoral/thematic investments, exhibited the highest returns (38-50%) but also carried significant risk. Hybrid funds, such as multi-asset allocation and aggressive hybrid funds, provide a balance between equity-like returns and reduced volatility (26-35%). Debt funds offered the lowest but most stable returns (7-13%), with performance influenced by interest rate cycles and credit risk. This study highlights the consistent outperformance of quantitative mutual funds across equity and hybrid categories, underlining the potential impact of quantitative and aggressive investment strategies. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding risk-return trade-offs, diversification, and aligning investments with individual financial goals and risk tolerance. This study provides valuable insights for investors, fund managers, and policymakers to navigate the Indian mutual fund landscape. However, it is crucial to consider that past performance does not guarantee future results, and a comprehensive investment approach should consider broader market and economic factors.

Equity Funds, Hybrid Funds, Debt Funds, Risk-Return, Fund Performance, Market Trends, Quantitative Strategies, etc.

1. Basso, A., & Funari, S. (2016). The Role of Fund Size in the Performance of Mutual Funds Assessed with DEA Models. The European Journal of Finance, 23(6), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2016.1164209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Derwall, J. (2006). The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9099-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chang, E. C., & Lewellen, W. G. (1984). Market Timing and Mutual Fund Investment Performance. The Journal of Business, 57(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1086/296224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, Z., & Lin, R. (2006). Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis with New Risk Measures. OR Spectrum, 28(3), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-005-0032-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chaudhari, N. (2020). Performance Evaluation of Selected Hybrid Mutual Funds in India. GAP iNTERDISCIPLINARITIES A Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, III(III), 52-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Comer, G. (2006). Hybrid Mutual Funds and Market Timing Performance*. The Journal of Business, 79(2), 771–797. https://doi.org/10.1086/499137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Comer, G., Rodriguez, J., & Larrymore, N. (2007). Controlling for Fixed-Income Exposure in Portfolio Evaluation: Evidence from Hybrid Mutual Funds. Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 481–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cuthbertson, K., Nitzsche, D., & O’Sullivan, N. (2010). Mutual Fund Performance: Measurement and Evidence1. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 19(2), 95–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0416.2010.00156.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1993). Performance Measurement without Benchmarks: An Examination of Mutual Fund Returns. The Journal of Business, 66(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1086/296593 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Henriksson, R. D. (1984). Market Timing and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Investigation. The Journal of Business, 57(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1086/296225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Indro, D. C., Jiang, C. X., Hu, M. Y., & Lee, W. Y. (1999). Mutual Fund Performance: Does Fund Size Matter? Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n3.2274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jesrani, A. R. (2023). Performance Analysis of Mutual Fund: A Comparative Study of the Selected Hybrid (Aggressive Hybrid Funds & Conservative Hybrid Funds) Mutual Fund Schemes in India. International Journal of Management, Public Policy and Research, 2(4), 125-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jiang, S., Uddin, A., Yu, D., & Wei, Z. (2023). The Network of Mutual Funds: A Dynamic Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network for Estimating Mutual Funds Performance. 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/3604237.3626910 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kaur, I., & Kaushik, K. P. (2016). Determinants of Investment Behaviour of Investors Towards Mutual Funds. Journal of Indian Business Research, 8(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-04-2015-0051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kothari, S. P., & Warner, J. B. (2001). Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1985–2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00397 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Matallín‐Sáez, J. C. (2006). Seasonality, Market Timing and Performance Amongst Benchmarks and Mutual Fund Evaluation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9–10), 1484–1507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00636.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Meera, N., & Venkataramaraju, D. (2020). A Comparative Study of Performance of Top 5 Mutual Funds in India. Malaya Journal of Matematik, S(02), 3607-3609. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Paul, T. K., Jana, C., & Pal, M. (2021). Portfolio Selection as A Multicriteria Group Decision Making in Pythagorean Fuzzy Environment with GRA And FAHP Framework. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(1), 478–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Peykani, P., Emrouznejad, A., Mohammadi, E., & Gheidar-Kheljani, J. (2022). A Novel Robust Network Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Performance Assessment of Mutual Funds Under Uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 339(3), 1149–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04625-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Philpot, J., Schulman, C. T., Hearth, D., & Rimbey, J. N. (1998). Active Management, Fund Size, and Bond Mutual Fund Returns. Financial Review, 33(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.1998.tb01372.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Santhosh, M. (2024). Comparative Analysis Between Hybrid Funds, Equity, and Debt Funds. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 7(3), 845-852. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sharma, K.B. and Joshi, P. (2021). A Comparative Study on Performance Evaluation of Selected Debt, Equity, And Hybrid Mutual Fund Schemes in India. GAP GYAN: A Global Journal of Social Sciences, IV(II), 35-40. https://www.gapgyan.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shukla, R., & Trzcinka, C. (1994). Persistent Performance in the Mutual Fund Market: Tests with Funds and Investment Advisers. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 4(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01074960 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Shukla, R., Niranjani, S., & Derashri, P. (2024). A Comparative Analysis on Mutual Fund Schemes of Top Five Mutual Fund Companies in India. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 12(4), 538-550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Singh, L., Dixit, N., Girahiya, N., & Vaishnav, M. (2024). Performance Analysis and Strategic Insights into Equity, Debt, And Hybrid Mutual Funds: A Comparative Study in India. Educational Administration: Theory And Practice, 30(5), 2849–2856. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vasani, G. H., & Rachchhh, P. J. (2020). A Comparative Study of Performance of Top-Rated Equity, Debt and Hybrid Mutual Fund Schemes in India. International Journal of Research in All Subjects in Multi Languages, 8(10), 9-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Vishali, M., & Shafi M.K, M. (2024). Emerging paradigms in socially responsible investment (SRI)—A study with focus on ESG mutual funds in India. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i4.2006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar