Reading Engagement, Reading Anxiety, and Self-Perceived Reading Success among Malaysian ESL Foundation Students: A Descriptive Study

This descriptive quantitative study examined the levels of reading anxiety, reading engagement, and self-perceived reading performance among Malaysian ESL foundation students across three academic programmes: Science, Engineering, and Law. Underpinned by Krashen’s Affective Filter Hypothesis and Guthrie and Wigfield’s Engaged Reading Model (2000), the study aimed to describe learners’ emotional and motivational experiences in academic reading contexts. A total of 155 students participated, responding to a structured questionnaire adapted from established instruments: the Foreign Language Reading Anxiety Scale (Saito, Garza, & Horwitz, 1999), the Motivations for Reading Questionnaire (Guthrie & Wigfield, 2000), and selected items from the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (Mokhtari & Sheorey, 2002) and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich & De Groot, 1990). Descriptive analysis revealed that the overall level of reading anxiety was moderate (M = 2.95, SD = 0.99). Among the three groups, Law students reported the highest anxiety (M = 3.15, SD = 1.10), followed by Science (M = 3.01, SD = 0.89) and Engineering (M = 2.67, SD = 0.94). Reading engagement was generally high (M = 3.82, SD = 0.77), while self-perceived reading performance was moderate (M = 3.46, SD = 0.83). The findings indicate that although students are engaged readers, moderate anxiety may still influence their perceived performance. The study highlights the need for supportive instructional practices and structured strategies such as TEEEL to enhance engagement and reduce anxiety in ESL reading classrooms.

reading anxiety, reading engagement, self-perceived reading performance, ESL foundation students, descriptive study

1. Abid, N., Aslam, S., Alghamdi, A. A., & Kumar, T. (2023). Relationships among students’ reading habits, study skills, and academic achievement in English at the secondary level. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1020269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Qahtani, M. (2022). Exploring reading engagement among EFL university students in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 15(5), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n5p45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Shboul, M., Ahmad, I., Nordin, M., & Rahman, Z. A. (2020). Foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance: A study among Jordanian EFL learners. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(2), 1009–1026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, S.-F., Du, H.-N., Wang, S.-X., & Yang, L.-R. (2022). Understanding EFL reading anxiety in relation to learning motivation, attitudes and strategies for Chinese and Spanish undergraduates. System, 108, 102820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Edward, E. I., Kamlun, K., Din, W. A., & Pudin, C. S. J. (2021). Reading difficulties among Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners: A preliminary study. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(43), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.643006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fitrawati, Kamil, I., & Perrodin, D. D. (2023). Foreign language reading anxiety: Exploring the experiences of EFL students at a state university in Padang, Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 6(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hamedi, S. M., Pishghadam, R., & Fadardi, J. S. (2020). The contribution of reading emotions to reading comprehension: The mediating effect of reading engagement using a structural equation modeling approach. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 19(2), 211–238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jeon, E. Y., & Day, R. R. (2016). The effectiveness of extensive reading on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 246–265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kamaruddin, S. F., & Kaur, N. (2023). Reading anxiety in online classroom among Malaysian university learners: Lessons from pandemic to post-pandemic era. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 12(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v12i1.4706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lee, J., & Hsieh, P. (2022). Self-efficacy and L2 reading confidence among university learners. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820985234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Li, H., Wang, C., & Others (2025). Teacher Support, Reading Enjoyment, and Self-Efficacy: Predictors of Student Reading Engagement and Volume. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 41(3), 267–283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liu, X. K. (2023). The effect of affective filter hypothesis on college students’ English writing teaching and its enlightenment. Open Access Library Journal, 10(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.110671 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Malanchini, M., Wang, Z., Voronin, I., Schenker, V. J., Plomin, R., Petrill, S. A., & Kovas, Y. (2017). Reading self‐perceived ability, enjoyment and achievement: A genetically informative study of their reciprocal links over time. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mardianti, N., Wijayati, P. H., & Murtadho, N. (2021). The correlation between students’ reading anxiety and their reading comprehension in ESP context. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Merga, M. K. (2020). Harnessing the power of reading engagement. In K. Dikilitaş et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Literacy Summit (pp. 10–15). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mohammed, A. S. H., Zulkifli, Z., & Mat Surin, E. S. (2019). The factors that influence the reading habit among Malaysian: A systematic literature review. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 11936, pp. 523–532). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34032-2_47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pham, M., & Lin, L. (2021). Motivational and cognitive engagement in English reading: A study of EFL learners in Asia. System, 103, 102631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102631 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pollack, C., Wilmot, D., Centanni, T. M., Halverson, K., Frosch, I., D’Mello, A. M., & Christodoulou, J. A. (2021). Anxiety, motivation, and competence in mathematics and reading for children with and without learning difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704821 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rahayu, S., & Fitriana, D. (2021). Reading anxiety and comprehension difficulties among Indonesian EFL learners. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.21156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Shuib, M., & Abdullah, N. (2023). Self-perceived reading competence and motivation among Malaysian university students. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i1.210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Solati, A., Amani, A., & Armat, M. R. (2024). Impact of learning environment on reading anxiety: a study of medical students in online and traditional settings. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sümer Dodur, H. M., & Ceylan, M. (2025). Academic self-concept and reading comprehension among students with learning disabilities: Serial mediating effect of reading anxiety and reading motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Taboada Barber, A., Klauda, S. L., & Wang, W. (2021). Reading anxiety, engagement, and achievement: A comparison of emergent bilinguals and English monolinguals in the elementary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(1), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.398 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tonka, H., & Bakır, S. (2020). The examination of the relationship between the secondary school students’ habit of reading and their reading anxiety. Journal of Educational Issues, 6 (1), 293-313. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v6i1.16986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Van der Sande, L., van Steensel, R., Fikrat-Wevers, S., & Arends, L. (2023). Effectiveness of interventions that foster reading motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(21), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09719-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wan, K.-H., & Razali, A. B. (2023). Extensive reading and its impact on Malaysian undergraduate ESL/EFL learners’ reading proficiency and reading motivation. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(1), 1402–1416. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i1/16450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Whitaker, S. K. (2009). Development and validation of the Reading Engagement Survey. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., & You, W. (2012). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 199–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Xie, X., & Huang, H. (2024). Impacts of reading anxiety on online reading comprehension of Chinese secondary school students: The mediator role of motivations for online reading. Cogent Education, 11(1) https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2365589 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zhao, L. (2023). Disciplinary reading anxiety in EFL tertiary education: A comparative study. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 10(2), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]