Moderation and Mediation: Technological Applications in Social Conflict Resolution

This article examines the evolving role of technology in the management of online conflict, emphasizing a shift from passive moderation to active mediation. Conventional moderation systems eliminate content and penalize individuals, potentially hindering society's capacity to engage in challenging yet essential discussions. Mediation-based solutions facilitate mediated exchanges grounded in conflict resolution theory and computer-mediated communication. The updated study design employs a mixed methods approach that integrates content analysis of social media platforms and conflict events with qualitative case studies of platforms evaluating mediation options. The findings indicate that technological mediation can identify escalation trends, intervene contextually, and reduce overt animosity compared to conventional moderation. Nonetheless, two significant drawbacks exist: reliance on platform-generated statistics and restricted generalizability due to selective case studies, which hinder the comprehension of long-term effects on relationship quality from the perspective of direct users. In principle, technology serves as a hybrid intermediary both regulating and facilitating discourse extending Habermasian communicative action into digitally regulated realms. Biases, opacities, and reductions in empathic capacity would further limit the revolutionary potential. The study indicates that moderation and mediation represent both a technological and conceptual restructuring of digital governance, highlighting the need for inclusive, contextual, and morally attuned interventions.

Mediation, Conflict, Governance, Communication

1. Canute, M., Jin, M., Holtzclaw, H., Lusoli, A., Adams, P., Pandya, M., Taboada, M., Maynard, D., & Chun, W. H. K. (2023). Dimensions of online conflict: Towards modelling agonism. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, 12194–12209. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cho, S., Zachry, M., & McDonald, D. W. (2025). A framework for AI-supported mediation in community-based online collaboration. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Iyer, R. (2024). How mediators and peacebuilders should work with social media companies: Moving from reactive moderation to proactive prevention. Accord Issue 30. https://www.c-r.org/accord/still-time-talk/how-mediators-and-peacebuilders-should-work-social-media-companies-moving [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Molina, M. D., & Sundar, S. Shyam. (2022). When AI moderates online content: Effects of human collaboration and interactive transparency on user trust. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(4), zmac010. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Open Justice. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of online mediation. Mediation Matters – Open Justice. https://www.open.ac.uk/open-justice/sites/www.open.ac.uk.open-justice/files/files/open-justice-week/2021/Mediation%20Matters%20-%20Advantages%20and%20Disadvantages%20of%20Online%20Mediation.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Terekhov, V. (2019). Online mediation: A game changer or much ado about nothing? Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 3(2), 33–50. https://ajee-journal.com/online-mediation-a-game-changer-or-much-ado-about-nothing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• LeafQuest: A Mobile-Based Augmented Reality for Plant Placement, Discovery, and Growth
• Participatory Ergonomic Intervention Approach on Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) in Construction Sectors: A Systematic Review
• Integrating GIS into Traffic Incident Management: A Web-Based System
• RideSmart: A Personalized Motorcycle Product Recommendation System Using TF-IDF and Descriptive Analytics for Javidson Motorshop
• Educational Technology Course Design in Pre-Service Teachers Education: A Bibliometric Review of the Research Landscape