The Influence of Parental Background on Academic Performance in English Language Among Senior Secondary School Students in the West Coast Region, The Gambia, West Africa

This study investigates the ‘Influence of Parental Background and Socio-economic Status on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students in English Language in the West Coast region of The Gambia, West Africa’. Recognizing the critical role of English Language education in national development and individual career advancement, the research aims to understand how parental qualifications and economic conditions affect students' achievement in this subject. A quantitative survey methodology was adopted, involving 150 respondents from two selected secondary schools in the region. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed to determine the relationship between parental factors and student performance. The findings reveal a significant correlation between parents’ educational attainment and socio-economic status and students’ performance in English Language. Students whose parents had higher qualifications and better economic means tended to perform better, while those lacking such support faced academic challenges. The study concludes that parental involvement, both in terms of educational support and socio-economic provision, is crucial to improving students' outcomes in English Language. It recommends that parents be more actively engaged in their children's education by providing the necessary academic exposure, encouragement, and material support to foster better performance in the subject.

Parental background, Academic Performance, children, English Language, Students, The Gambia

1. Adegboye, R. and Musa, A. A. (2021). “Socioeconomic Factors and Educational Access in Nigeria: A Household Survey Analysis.” International Journal of Social and Educational Research, 9(2), 25–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adeshina, E. B. (2011). Fostering the relationship between home and school: A case study of a senior secondary school in The Gambia. Master Thesis, Institute of Educational Leadership, University of Jyvaskila: 1-93 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adeyeye, G. M. (2023). The influence of family structure on children's academic achievement: evidence from some selected secondary schools in Oyo State, Nigeria, Eureka: Social and Humanities, 2: DOI: https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2023.002778 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adewale, A. M. (2012). The effects of parental socio-economic status on academic performance of students in selected schools in Edu LGA of Kwara State Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2 (7), 23- 25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Afolabi, M. O. (2022). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Effective Teaching in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Lagos: Scholarly Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ajayi, K. O. et al. (2021). Parents’ Education, occupation and Real Mother’s Age as predictors of Students’ Achievement in Mathematics in Some Selected Secondary Schools in Ogun state, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Akujieze, N. (2003). Impact of parents’ socioeconomic background on students’ achievement in agricultural science at the secondary school level in Ogbomoso, Oyo state, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Aljohani, M. (2017). Principles of "constructivism" in foreign language teaching. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 7(1), 97-107.2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ashton, P. T. (1990). Theme: Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 63-65 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Austin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education, journal of College Students Personnel, 25 (4), 297-308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bybee, R. (2009). A commissioned paper prepared for a workshop on exploring the intersection of science education and the development of21st century skills. The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. (RW Bybee, Ed.) USA: National Science Teachers Association. Pozyskane http://itsisu. concord. org/share/Bybee_21st_Century_Paper.dostęp: 14.12. 2015]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cao, Y., Goa, J., Lian, D., Rong, Z., Shi, J., Wang, Q. and Zhou, Y. (2018). Orderliness predicts academic performance: Behavioral analysis on campus lifestyle. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15, 146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Carlsen, W. S. (2023). Why do you ask? The effects of science teacher subject-matter Knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document. Reproduction Service NO. ED 293 181). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chen, A. and Ennis, C. D. (1995). Content knowledge transformation: an examination of the relationship between content knowledge and curricula, Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(4): 389-401.https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051x(94)00041-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chindanya, A. (2012) Effects of Parental Involvement in the Education of Children. Unpublished D. Ed. Thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chinyere, A. & Ibezim, O. K. (2023). “Teachers’ Instructional Skills and Student Academic Achievement in English Language.” Nigerian Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.4314/njer.v31i2.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Clinton, J., and Hattie, J. (2020) New Zealand students’ perceptions of parental involvement in Learning and schooling. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 33 (3), 324-337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Collins, H. M. (1981). "Stages in the Empirical Program of Relativism - Introduction". Social Studies of Science. 11 (1): 3. doi:10.1177/030631278101100101. S2CID 145123888. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Durand, T. M., & Perez, N. A. (2021). Continuity and variability in the parental involvement and advocacy beliefs of Latino families of young children: Finding the potential for a collective voice. School Community Journal, 23 (1), 49-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ebele, G. N. and Ogochukwu, E. J. (2024). Rethinking Educational Success in Nigeria: Integrating Pedagogy, Parenting, and Poverty Alleviation. Abuja: Academic Lens Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Escarce, J. J. (2003). Socioeconomic Status and the Fates of Adolescents, Health Services Research, 38(5):1229-33. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Scarce, J. J. (2013). Socio-economic status and the fate of adolescents, Education Research Journal, 2(2) 106-113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Evans, G. (2020). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59,77-98. Family process, 51(4), 483-497. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Eze, M. U. and Nwosu, B. I. (2022). “Literacy Levels and Parental Engagement in Child Education in Enugu State.” African Review of Educational Development, 27(3), 63–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Fleury, S., and Garrison, J. (2014). Toward a new philosophical anthropology of education: Fuller considerations of social constructivism. Interchange, 45(1-2), 19-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358439655_Social_Constructivism_A_New_Paradigm_in_Teaching_and_Learning_Environment [accessed May 30 2025]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., and Shulman, L. (2022). Teachers of substance: Subject Matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.). Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23-36). Oxford: Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Graetz, B. (2023). Perspectives on socioeconomic status and school education: Australian Government Publishing service. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Henderson and Mapp, M. (2020). Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kanno, T. N. (2018). Guided discovery teaching method. In T. N. Kanno& U. M. Nzewi (Eds.). Issues in Curriculum Development and Implementation in Nigeria. Lagos: Foremost Educational Services Ltd.9.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358439655_Social_Constructivism_A_New_Paradigm_in_Teaching_and_Learning_Environment Accessed May 27 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kennedy, M. (1990). Trends and Issues in: Teachers' Subject Matter Knowledge. Trends and Issues Paper No. 1. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education, Washington, DC. (ED#322 100) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kussmaul, C. and Pirmann, T. (2021). Guided Inquiry Learning with Technology: Investigations to Support Social Constructivism. InCSEDU (1): 483-490). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lamas, H. (2015). School performance. Journal of Educational Psychology; Propositos y represetacious, 3 (1), 351-385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Lawson, M. and Farah, J. (2022). A meta-analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status and executive function performance among children. Developmental Science, 21(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mallan, D. (2020). Relationship between Socioeconomic performance and students’ academic performance of senior secondary school in Kebbi. Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation, Usman Danfodiyo University Sokoto [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Marks, R. (2023). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a Modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 4(3) 41-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. McKinley, J. (2015). "Critical Argument and Writer Identity: Social Constructivism as a Theoretical Framework for EFL Academic Writing" (PDF). Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. 12 (3): 184–207. doi:10.1080/15427587.2015.1060558. S2CID 53541628. Retrieved 3 June 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mudassir, A., & Abubakar, N. (2021). The impact of parents’ occupation on Academic performance in secondary school students. Multimiginal Academic Journal of social sciences, .3(1): 65-68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mukanziza, J. and Singirankabo, E. 92024). Link between Socio-Economic Status and Students’ Performance in Nine- and Twelve-Years Basic Education in Rwanda: Groupe Scholaire Saint Leon Nyarusange and Groupe Scholaire Nsinda. Open Access Library, 11 (7): 1-13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Odoh, L. C and Uhwaunayi, U. B. (2017). Influence of parental occupation and level of education on academic performance of accounting students in Nigeria, Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7 (10): 21-27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ogunniyi, T. A. (2024). “The Role of Home Background in Educational Outcomes: A Study of Low-Income Households.” West African Journal of Education and Society, 8(1), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ogunshola, F., Adewale, A.M. (2012). The effects of parental socio-economic status on academic performance of students in selected schools in Edu Lga of Kwara State Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research. Business Soc. Sci., 2(7): 230-239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Okebukola, P. A. (2020). Breaking Barriers to Learning: The Culturo-Techno-Contextual Approach (CTCA). Sterling Publisher, Slough, UK., New Delhi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Olatunde, T. S. (2024). “Financial Constraints and Academic Performance in Nigerian Public Schools.” Educational Policy and Planning Review, 11(4): 101–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Ololube, N. P., Onyekwere, L. A., and Agbor, C. N. (2015). Social stratification and mobility: how socio-economic status of family affects children’s educational development and management. Education, 5(4), 111-122. DOI: 10.5923/j.edu.20150504.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Omotayo, S. A., and Adeleke, J. O. (2017). The 5E Instructional Model: A Constructivist Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Outcomes in Mathematics. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 21(2), 15-26.23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Omotoyinbo, D. W. (2020). Effectiveness of instructional materials in teaching English language in secondary schools in Ondo State, Nigeria, International Journal of Research in Education Humanities and Commerce, 1 (3): 72-83 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Ononuga, F. (2005). Relationship between Socio-Economic Status and Academic Achievement in Economics. Unpublished B. Ed Project, University of Ibadan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Oyeleye, B. O. and Ayodele, B. (2022). Availability of educational resources and principals' managerial effectiveness in secondary schools for educational sustainable development in southwest, Nigeria. Journal of Economic, Social and Educational Issues, 2(2), 125-133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Pedrosa, L. et al. (2023). Educational and Social Economic background of graduates and academic performance: Consequences for affirmative action programs at a Brazilian Research University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Piaget, J. (1967). Development and Learning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rana, M. (2022). The influence of parents’ educational level on their children’s academic performance. Journal of Education practice. Indus International Institute D.G. Khan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Rothestein, R. 2004. Class and schools using social economic and educational reforms to close the white and black achievement gap. Economic Policy Institute, U.S.A [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. (PDF) Influence of Parental Occupation and Level of Education on Academic Performance of Accounting Students in Nigeria. Available from: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344748096_Influence_of_Parental_Occupation_and_Level_of_Education_on_Academic_Performance_of_Accounting_Students_in_Nigeria#fullTextFileContent [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Romerhausen, N. J. (2013). Strategies to enhance student success: A discourse analysis of academic advice in international student handbooks. Journal of International Students, 3(2), 129–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Saila, T. and Chamundeswari, S. (2021). Influence of parental occupation and level of education on academic performance of accounting students in Nigeria [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Saleem, A. A, Huma Kausa, H. D. and Deeba, F. (2021) Social Constructivism: A New Paradigm in Teaching and Learning Environment. Available from: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358439655_Social_Constructivism_A_New_Paradigm_in_Teaching_and_Learning_Environment Perennial Journal of History (PJH) 2(2): 403-421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Shah, S. O. and Hussain, M. (2021). Parental occupation and its effect on the academic performance of children, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 8(8): 576-583. www.jetir.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Sapungan, G. M. and Saungan, R. M. (2014). Parental Involvement in Child's Education: Importance, Barriers and Benefits. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 3(2): 42-48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Sarigiani, P. (2020). Self image and educational plans of adolescents from two contrasting communities. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, San Francisco [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Singh, S. and Yaduvanshi, S. (2015). Constructivism in science classroom: Why and how. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(3), 1-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358439655_Social_Constructivism_A_New_Paradigm_in_Teaching_and_Learning_Environment Accessed May 30 2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Pedagogical content knowledge: teachers' integration of subject matter, pedagogy, students, and learning environments: Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15: 4-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Ugwuja, G. O. (2010). Influence of Family Background on the Academic Achievement of Senior Secondary School Students in Nsukka Educational Zone of Enugu State. Unpublished Master’s [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Degree in Sociology of Education, University of Nigeria UNESCO (2011). Family background and literacy performance [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. https://www.oecd.org/dataoecd3369905591. Retrieved March 7, 2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. UNESCO (2023). Education and Socioeconomic Status in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Regional Report. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Vygotsky, S. (2021). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Wang, Y. (2019). The development history and guiding significance of China’s view of higher vocational education in the 40 years of reforms and opening up, journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College, 15: 119-123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Zhou, Z. and Siti, M. M. (2022). A literature review on the academic achievement of college students. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 20 (1) 11-18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Zhu, S. (2016). A review of college students academic achievement research, teaching and education. higher Education Forum, 271: 36-38 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Xu, J., Guo, S., Feng, Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Nunez, J. C., and Fan, H. (2023). Parental Homework Involvement and Students’ Achievement: A Three-level analysis, Psicothema, 36 (1): 1-14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Note: use the copy you forwarded to me and trace and delete all citation on pedagogical content knowledge in the reference section. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Carlson, H. L. (1999). From practice to theory: A social constructivist approach to teacher education. Teachers and teaching, 5(2), 203-218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Case, R. (1993). Theories of learning and theories of development. Educational psychologist, 28(3), 219-233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Chen, A., & Ennis, C. D. (1995). Content knowledge transformation: An examination of the relationship between content knowledge and curricula. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(4), 389-401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of teacher education, 44(4), 263-272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Gudmundsdottir, S., & Shulman, L. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educationl Research, 31(2), 59-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Hartmuth, D., Amin, R. M., Schlichting, D., Schött, S., Haudenschild, J., Küchenhoff, H., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2025). Developing science teachers’ enacted pedagogical content knowledge through integration of student feedback into the Refined Consensus Model of pedagogical content knowledge. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2470563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational psychologist, 31(3-4), 191-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Khafaga1, 2, A., & Al-Johani, H. M. (2024). The Impact of Virtual Learning on Students‟ Engagement in the Saudi EFL Context: A Connectivism-Theoretic Perspective. World, 14(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Labinger, J. A., & Collins, H. (2010). The one culture?: a conversation about science. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. McKinley, B. (2022). Organizational Branding and Social Responsibility Strategies in Community Colleges: A Qualitative Inquiry Capella University]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Nilsson, P., & Vikström, A. (2015). Making PCK explicit—Capturing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2836-2857. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Salamat, L., Saleem, M. A., & Akhter, N. (2024). Exploring the Need for Inclusive Teaching and Challenges of Students with Different Abilities to Receive Higher Education in the Public Sector Universities. Journal of Social Horizons, 1(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Saleem, A., Kausar, H., & Deeba, F. (2021). Social constructivism: A new paradigm in teaching and learning environment. Perennial journal of history, 2(2), 403-421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Shulman, L. S. (2013). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Journal of Education, 193(3), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of curriculum studies, 36(2), 257-271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Takaya, K. (2008). Jerome Bruner’s theory of education: From early Bruner to later Bruner. Interchange, 39, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Ward, P., & Ayvazo, S. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptions and findings in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(3), 194-207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]