Viability of Rural Tourism in Malitbog, Southern Leyte, Philippines

Rural tourism has emerged as a significant avenue for sustainable development, promoting economic growth while preserving cultural and natural resources. This study assessed the viability of rural tourism in Malitbog, Southern Leyte, Philippines, focusing on natural beauty, cultural heritage, accessibility, accommodations, marketing, and socio-economic factors. The research also aimed to identify hindrances to tourism development and propose a tourism road map for sustainable growth. A descriptive-correlation research design was employed, utilizing primary data collected from 100 respondents, including 50 local residents and 50 tourists from selected barangays. Data were gathered through a validated researcher-made questionnaire and analyzed using frequency, percentage, weighted mean, ranking, and Chi-square tests. Findings indicated that all aspects of rural tourism in Malitbog were rated highly viable. Natural beauty and resources received the highest ratings, followed by cultural heritage and activities. Accessibility, accommodation, marketing, and socio-economic factors were also deemed highly viable, highlighting Malitbog’s potential as a rural tourism destination. Hindrances identified included gaps in signage, safety measures, and tourism-related entrepreneurial skills. Statistical analysis revealed no significant relationship between respondents’ demographic profiles and their perceptions of tourism viability, suggesting that infrastructure, marketing, and community engagement are more influential factors. The study concludes that Malitbog possesses strong potential for sustainable rural tourism development. Recommendations include improving accessibility, enhancing safety and security measures, strengthening marketing efforts, and providing training to boost local participation. A proposed tourism road map outlines actionable strategies for stakeholders to harness tourism as a tool for inclusive economic growth and heritage conservation.

rural tourism, sustainable development, cultural heritage, tourism viability, community engagement

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. An, W., & Alarcon, S. (2020). How can rural tourism be sustainable? A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(18), 7758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, J., Huang, Y., Wu, E. Q., Ip, R., & Wang, K. (2023). How does rural tourism experience affect green consumption in terms of memorable rural-based tourism experiences, connectedness to nature and environmental awareness? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 54, 166–177. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i7.1386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hall, D. R., & Richards, G. (2000). Tourism and sustainable community development. Routledge London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kumar, S., & Valeri, M. (2022). Understanding the relationship among factors influencing rural tourism: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(2), 385–407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lane, B., & Kastenholz, E. (2015). Rural tourism: The evolution of practice and research approaches – towards a new generation concept [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nunkoo, R., & Ramkissoon, H. (2012). Structural equation modelling and regression analysis in tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 15(8) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Priatmoko, S., Kabil, M., Akaak, A., Lakner, Z., Gyuricza, C., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Understanding the complexity of rural tourism business: Scholarly perspective. Sustainability, 15(2), 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rosalina, P. D., Dupre, K., & Wang, Y. (2021). Rural tourism: A systematic literature review on definitions and challenges. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 134–149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Tang, M., & Xu, H. (2023). Cultural integration and rural tourism development: A scoping literature review. Tourism and Hospitality, 4(1), 75–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Wang, X., & Sun, J. (2023). Land acquisition in rural tourism destinations: How social relations influence cooperative behaviours? International Journal of Tourism Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Yang, J., Yang, R., Chen, M.-H., Su, C.-H. J., Zhi, Y., & Xi, J. (2021). Effects of rural revitalization on rural tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Zielinski, S., Jeong, Y., Kim, S., & B. Milanés, C. (2020). Why community-based tourism and rural tourism in developing and developed nations are treated differently? A review. Sustainability, 12(15), 5938. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Analysis of Waste Management Practices in Selected Buffet Restaurants in Quezon City, Philippines
• Assessing the Effects of COVID-19 on Hospitality and Tourism Employment
• A Conceptual Framework for Profiling Stream Anglers in Malaysia
• Service Quality and Guests’ Satisfaction: Evidence from Banda Hilir, Melaka
• "Empowering Urban Communities through Sustainable Tourism: The Case of GLOW 2025 in Kampung Pengkalan Rama Pantai, Melaka"