Transformative Rural Land Governance For Gender Empowerment In Ethiopia: The Case Of Amhara Regional State Rural Land Policy

Governance of resources like land in Ethiopia lacks mainstreaming gender issues. Most of the rural people specially women are affected negatively by access and control over land due to economic, cultural, and other interrelated factors. This study is primarily focused on a gender-based analysis of the rural land policy of the Amhara regional state, Ethiopia. Specifically, this research identifies how the right to access and control land is stated in the policy document, the productive and reproductive roles of women stated in the regional rural land policy, gender stereotypes, norms, and judgments that exist about access and control over land and the social norms (about inheritance, marriage, and divorce) affecting the regional land policy in terms of access and control of land. In this study, a qualitative research methodology is applied. Secondary data sources are used for the analysis. Gender-aware policy appraisal as a tool for the analysis of the rural land policy of Amhara regional state is used.
This study concludes that several gaps, contradictions, and ambiguities exist in the rural land laws of the Amhara regional state. In particular, gaps in regulations related to related to inheritance, donation, rent in relation to women’s land right are visible. Both in the federal and regional land policy document no provision gives attention and provides guidelines to ensure how stakeholders’ coordination minimizes the implementation problems. Women also face the conditions of losing ownership rights due to administrative bias. As a recommendation, the law needs revision in a way that primarily focuses on gender differences and collaborative work for an efficient land administration system. In terms of access and control of land in the Amhara regional state land policy; priority should be given to rural women who are economically poor and culturally affected.

Gender equality, Land governance, Empowerment, Land policy

1. Agarwal, B. (1998). A field of one’s own: Gender and land right in the south Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almaz, W (2007). Women’s access to and control over land in the current land administration system in two rural kebeles in Ada’a woreda of Oromia Region. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ambaye, D. W. (2012). Land Rights in Ethiopia: Ownership, equity, and liberty in land use rights. Paper presented at the FIG Working Week. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Assefa, T., & Ababa, A. (2014). Institutional Capacity of Local Government in Implementing the National Policy on Ethiopian Women (NPEW): the Case of Dilla Town. Addis Ababa University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ayano, M. F. (2018). Rural land registration in Ethiopia: Myths and realities. Law & Society Review, 52(4), 1060- 1097. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bishaw, A. (2015). Assessing gender mainstreaming to ensure gender equity and equality in education, social and economic sectors. The case of Amhara region, Ethiopia. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 17(2), 37-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Budlender, D., Elston, D., Hewitt, G., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2002). Gender budgets make cents: understanding gender responsive budgets: Commonwealth Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carpano, F. 2010. Strengthening women’s access to land: The Tanzanian experience of the “Sustainable Rangeland Management Project.” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Daniel W., 2011, Land Rights in Ethiopia: ownership, equity and liberty in land use rights, a paper presented in FIG Working Week, Rome, Italy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Doss, C., Summerfield, G., & Tsikata, D. (2014). Land, gender, and food security: Taylor & Francis. Gordon, E., McHugh, C., & Townsley, J. (2021). Risks versus Transformational Opportunities in Gender- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. FDRE, (2006). The Revised Amhara National Regional State Rural Land Administration and Use Proclamation, Proclamation No. 133/2006. Zikre Hig. Year 11, No.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies, 2(2), 137-165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Judd, K. (2002). Gender Budget Initiatives: Strategies, Concepts and Experiences: Papers from a High Level International Conference'Strengthening Economic and Financial Governance Through Gender Responsive Budgeting'Brussels, 16-18 October 2001: United Nations Development Fund for Women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Moges, M. B. (2020). Achievements and Gaps in the Application of the Land Registration System in ANRS: The Case of West Gojjam Zone. Mizan Law Review, 14(1), 31-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nakhone, L., & Kabuta, C. (1998). A review of gender disaggregated data on maize and wheat cropping systems in Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nega, B., Adenew, B., & Gebre Sellasie, S. (2003). Current land policy issues in Ethiopia. Land Reform, Land Settlement, and Cooperatives, 11(3), 103-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Odeny, M. (2013). Improving access to land and strengthening women’s land rights in Africa. Paper presented at the World Bank Conference on Land and poverty, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Reda, K. T. (2014). Formal and informal land tenure systems in Afar region, Ethiopia: Perceptions, attitudes and implications for land use disputes. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 14(2), 41-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Responsive Security Sector Reform. Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(2), ogaa028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/data-analysis/importance-of-researcher-reflexivity-and- positionality-in-the-qualitative-research-process.php?vref=1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rozel, C. (2010). Gender Aware Approaches in Agricultural Programmes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tura, H. (2014). Women's Right to and Control over Rural Land in Ethiopia: The Law and the Practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UKEssays. (2018). Importance of Researcher Reflexivity and Positionality in the Qualitative Research Process. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wabelo, T. S. (2020). Legal and institutional frameworks regulating rural land governance in Ethiopia: towards a comparative analysis on the best practices of other African countries. Beijing L. Rev., 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zelalem H. 2013, Towards improved transaction of land use rights in Ethiopia, annual world bank conference on land and poverty, the world bank, Washington DC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Financial Availability and Its Influence on Women’s Economic Empowerment in Kakamega County, Kenya