Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover

Leadership is one of the determinants of organisational performance due to its effect on employee behaviours and strategic objectives in dynamic environments. The study examines the effect of leadership styles on employee outcomes such as motivation, job satisfaction and turnover. The research takes into consideration transformational, transactional, participative, autocratic and laissez-faire leadership styles. A systematic review of the literature was carried out on databases such as Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO with inclusion criteria of peer-reviewed empirical articles published in English in the last ten years. Based on PRISMA guidelines, 58 studies were synthesised. Results show that transformational and participative leadership styles consistently relate to higher intrinsic motivation, greater job satisfaction and lower turnover intentions. Transactional leadership exerts moderate influences on extrinsic motivation and short-term retention but has less influence on longer-term engagement. Autocratic and laissez-faire styles are linked with lower satisfaction and increased turnover. Mediating processes include trust, psychological empowerment, quality of communication and perceived organisational support, with contextual moderators such as cultural dimensions and work arrangements influencing these impacts. Implications include that organisations must invest in leadership training programs in emotional intelligence, autonomy support and implementation of adaptive styles. HR practices that are embedded in career development, reward systems and flexible work facilitate motivation and retention. Meta-analytic procedures estimated average effect sizes and tested heterogeneity using I2 statistics to ensure robustness. Thematic synthesis using qualitative coding allowed a close understanding of motivational processes in various settings. Longitudinal, mixed-methods and cross-cultural research designs ought to be employed in future research to address gaps. Overall, aligning leadership behaviours with employee psychological needs and environmental demands is vital for engagement, satisfaction and retention, and thus organisational resilience and effectiveness.

Leadership, Styles, Employee, Motivation, Job, Satisfaction

1. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organisational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta- analysis. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Derks, D. (2014). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 87(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Buil, I., Martínez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and organisational identification as drivers of employee loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 101, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organisational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018). CASP checklists. https://casp-uk.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organisational culture and climate? Academy of Management Executive, 10(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1996.9602111578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.87.4.611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organisational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149–190). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training & Development Journal, 23(5), 26–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organisations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organisations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376– [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. 407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews (Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401). Keele University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Rand McNally. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1979). Participation in decision making: One more look. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 1, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G.; PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nemanich, L. A., & Keller, R. T. (2007). Transformational leadership in an acquisition: A field study of employees. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee training and development (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Obuobisa-Darko, P. (2020). The mediating role of employee engagement in leadership outcomes: Evidence from Ghanaian firms. Journal of Management Studies, 57(3), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12527 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. D., Grover, R. A., & Huber, V. L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviours: Fact or fiction? Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 33(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90003-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Iowa State University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organisational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behaviour. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence- informed management knowledge by systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organisations. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Wong, C.-S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00110-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Xu, G., Zeng, J., Wang, H., Qian, C., & Gu, X. (2022). How transformational leadership motivates employee involvement: The roles of psychological safety and traditionality. SAGE Open, 12(4), 1–https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221141234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Xue, H., Luo, Y., Luan, Y., & Wang, N. (2022). A meta-analysis of leadership and intrinsic motivation: Examining relative importance and moderators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 941161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organisations (8th ed.). Pearson [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar