Analyzing Community Initiatives and Government Interventions in Salt Farming Resource Management in Pangkajene and Kepulauan Districts

Community development is a process where all community initiatives (local initiatives) are combined with local government intervention through policies in a development program, especially the management of salt farming resources in Pangkajene and Kepulauan districts, which is expected to have an impact on improving the living conditions of the salt farming community to be more decent. This study aims to determine the model of community initiatives in salt farming resource management, and government interventions in salt farming resource management, as well as the impact of community initiatives and government interventions in salt farming resource management. Meanwhile, the impact of the salt farming community initiative can be seen from three aspects: 1) capabilities, namely the existence of original knowledge obtained through the accumulation of experience from generation to generation; 2) self-organisation ability, namely the existence of togetherness and mutual cooperation values that are still maintained through social activities and in traditional groups; 3) resources/assets, namely that the results of the salt farming business are mostly only to meet the needs of salt farmers and their families (subsistence). Meanwhile, the impact of government intervention can also be seen from three aspects:1) capabilities, i.e. more adequate modern norms that have been institutionalised in the community and relatively provide a guarantee of order; 2) self-organisation capabilities, i.e. changes in social stratification with the emergence of new social organisations with diverse goals and interests; 3) resources/assets, i.e. an increase in income from the implementation of programs related to the management of aquaculture and empowerment of more adequate salt farmers.

Community initiative model, government intervention, resource management, and salt ponds

1. Evans, Mary. 1981. Lucien Goldmann; an Introduction. Sussex; Harvester Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adjid, H. M. S. (1986). Masalah partisipasi masyarakat dalam rangka peningkatan pembangunan di Sulawesi Selatan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amien, M., Mappadjantji, & Tim Unhas. (1999). Pembangunan kelautan Indonesia dari perspektif kemandirian lokal. Makassar: Tim Unhas. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asep Saefuddin, Syarief, R., Zulbainarni, N., & Sunoko, R. (2023). Strategies for increasing competitiveness in the salt processing industry in Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Christenson, J. A., & Robinson, J. W. Jr. (1994). Community development in perspective. Iowa State University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1997). Rural development participation: Concepts and measures for project design, implementation and evaluation. Cornell University, The Rural Development Committee, Center for International Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Conyers, D. (1994). Perencanaan sosial di dunia ketiga: Suatu pengantar (Terjemahan). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gany, R. A. (2001). Menyonsong abad baru dalam globalisasi dengan pendekatan pembangunan berbasis kemandirian lokal. Makassar: Hasanuddin University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gunarya, A. (2002). Makalah tentang rancangan riset kualitatif. Unhas, Makassar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hamka Naping. (2017). Laut, manusia dan kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Dipantara. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kusumastanto, T. (2003). Ocean policy dalam membangun negeri bahari di era otonomi daerah. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mishra, S. N. (1984). Participation and development. New Delhi: NBO Publisher Distributor. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Moleong, L. J. (2000). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Muhammad Arief Akbar, Adrian, F., & Rahmatillah, L. F. (2023). Potential and challenges of national salt production. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mubyarto. (1988). Sistem UDKP dan pembangunan desa terpadu PPSPK. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Murray, G. R. (1995). Community organization: Theory and principle. New York: Harvard. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ndraha, T. (1990). Pembangunan masyarakat: Mempersiapkan masyarakat tinggal landas. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ohama, Y. (2001). Conceptual framework for participatory local social development. Nagoya: JICA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rahman, F. (2019, February). Save the world versus man-made disaster: A cultural perspective. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 235, No. 1, p. 012071). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sahib, H., Rahman, F., Duli, A., & Asba, A. R. (2019, May). Customary Forest Conservation through Informal Knowledge System of Ammatowa Community. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 270, No. 1, p. 012042). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Salman, D. (2002). Pendekatan partisipatoris perencanaan pembangunan daerah. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam “Diklat Program Kepemimpinan Bappeda dalam Era Otonomi Daerah”, Depdagri, Jakarta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Soetrisno, L. (1995). Menuju masyarakat partisipatif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sumodiningrat. (1999). Strategi kebijakan dan program pembangunan pedesaan. Yogyakarta: Lapera Pustaka Utama. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tikson, D. (2000). Community development dalam pembangunan masyarakat lokal. Makalah pelatihan manajemen perkotaan, kerja sama URDI, PIPS Sulawesi Selatan, dan PPS Unhas, Makassar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Yonvitner, & Akmal, S. G. (2021). Building competitive salt governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pemerintah Kabupaten Pangkajene dan Kepulauan. (2024). Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Pangkajene dan Kepulauan Nomor 6 Tahun 2024 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Daerah Tahun 2025–2045. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Psychoanalytical Study of the Gift of Magi