Water Scarcity Impact of Rural Livelihood Choices in Kieni Sub Counties, Kenya
Authors
Catholic University of Eastern Africa, Kenya (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110151
Subject Category: Poverty and Environment
Volume/Issue: 12/11 | Page No: 1692-1705
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-04
Accepted: 2025-12-09
Published: 2025-12-20
Abstract
Poverty in developing countries escalates environmental predicaments among rural populations in arid and semi (ASAL) communities. A key understated outcome of livelihood occupations on human wellbeing is their consequence on water scarcity. Yet, most studies involving poverty and the environment overlook implications of rural livelihood options on the environment in marginal areas. The objective of this study was to examine water scarcity impact of household livelihoods in Kieni East and West sub counties of Nyeri County in Kenya. This was essential as rural ASAL populations are most affected by scarcity of water resources. The study adopted cross sectional mixed method approach that applied household survey for quantitative data collection. The qualitative data gathering techniques included semi structured interviews, focused group discussions and desk reviews. Proportionate stratified random sampling technique was used to inaugurate a 400 sample size from a targeted population of 51,304 households. The study used independent T-Test to test statistical significance at p<0.05 for the two sites. Multiple regression techniques were applied to determine the influence of livelihood options on water scarcity in the study area. Based on the analysis, the study found linkage between livelihoods and water scarcity to be significant. Overall results at the two sites revealed water scarcity as predominantly instigated by household participation in forest based activities [B=0.264], livestock activities [B=0.184], and crop based activities [B=0.169] respectively. The results also demonstrated a higher impact of forest activities on water scarcity in Kieni East [B=0.313] than in Kieni West [B=0.231] at p<0.001; while livestock activities impact on water scarcity was more substantial in Kieni West [B=0.233] at P<0.05, compared to Kieni East [B=0.154] at p<0.05. The study concluded with some recommendations for policy and research consideration.
Keywords
Arid and Semi-Arid lands; Cropping activities, Forest activities; Household Livestock activities; Off farm activities.
Downloads
References
1. Adkinson, A., & Adkinson, R.,2013. The FecB (Booroola) gene and implications for the Turkish sheep industry.Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science. 37. 621-624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Barbier, E.B.,2013. Wealth Accounting, Ecological Capital and Ecosystem Services. Environment and Development Economics. 18.133-161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Barbier, E.B.,2010. Poverty, Development, and Environment, Environment and Development Economics, 15(6), 635-660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Barbier, E.B.,2008. Poverty, Development, and Ecological Services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2(1), 1-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Barbier, E.B.,2003. Habitat-fishery linkages and mangrove loss in Thailand, Contemporary Economic Policy, 21(1), 59-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bowen, S., & De Master, K.,2011. New rural livelihoods or museums of production? Quality food initiatives in practice. Journal of Rural Studies. 27. 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Carney, D.,1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What Contributions can we make? London: DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chambers, R., & Conway, G.R.,1992. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century (Discussion Paper 296). Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies. Neuchatel Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Clay, J.2004. World Agriculture and the Environment. A commodity by commodity guide to impacts and practices, Island Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Comim, F., P. Kumar & Sirven, N.,2009. Poverty and Environment Links: An Illustration from Africa. Journal of nternational Development, 21(3), 447-469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Cruz-Trinidad, A., Geronimo, R. C., & Aliño, P. M.,2009. Development trajectories and impacts on coral reef use in Lingayen Gulf, Philippines. Ocean & Coastal Management, 52(3-4), 173-180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Csaki, C., & Lerman, Z.,2000. Agricultural transition revisited: Issues of land reform and farm restructuring in East Central Europe and the former USSR. Washington, DC, World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Davis, J. R., & Bezemer, D.,2004. The Development of the Rural Non-Farm Economy in Developing Countries and ransition Economies: Key Emerging and Conceptual Issues. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Davis, J.R.,2003. The Rural Non-Farm Economy, Livelihoods, and Their Diversification: Issues and Options. Report prepared for Natural Resources Institute, Department for International Development, and World Bank. Chatham Maritime, Kent, UK: NRI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Dasgupta, S., U. Deichmann, C. Meisner, & Wheeler, D.,2005. Where is the Poverty –environment Nexus? Evidence from Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Vietnam, World Development, 33(4), 617-638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Degye, G., Belay, K., & Mengistu., K.,2012. Does Crop Diversification Enhance Household Food Security? Evidence from Rural Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture, Sciences and Engineering Research, 2 (11), 503 -515, Available: Online at http://www.ejournal.sedinst.com de [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Haan, L., & Zoomers, A., 2003. Development geography at the crossroads of livelihood and globalization. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(3), 350-362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Delgado, C., Rosegrant, M., Steinfield, H., Ehui, S. & Courbois, C.,1999. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper 28. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. DC. DFID., 2000. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets Sections 1-5. London: DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. DFID.,1999. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Sections 1-4. London: DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Ellis, F.,2000. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ellis, F.,2000b. The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 289–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ellis, F., & Freeman, H.A. (eds).,2005. Rural Livelihoods and Poverty Reduction Policies. Routledge: London and New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ellis, F.,1999. Rural livelihoods diversity in developing countries: evidence and policy implications, Vol. 40, London: ODI Natural Resources Perspective. ODI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Ellis, F.,1998. Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood Diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Escobal, J.,2001. The Determinants of Nonfarm Income Diversification in Rural Peru. World Development, 29(3), 497-508. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Fafchamps, M., Udry, C., & Czulcas, K.,1998. Drought and saving in West Africa: are livestock a buffer stock? Journal of Development Economics, 55.273 -305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. FAO,2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Global Forest Resources Assessment Main report, FAO Forestry Paper 163, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. FAO,2009. The State of Food and Agriculture—Livestock in the Balance, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. FAO & World Bank,2001. Farming systems and poverty-improving farmer’s livelihoods in a changing World, Rome and Washington D.C. pp.1- 41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Farrington, J., Carney, D., Ashley, C., & Turton, C.,1999. Sustainable livelihoods in practice: early applications of concepts in rural areas. 42. 1-2. London: ODI. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10535/4235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Gebru, G. W., & Beyene, F.,2012. Rural household livelihood strategies in drought-prone areas: A case of Gulomekeda District, eastern zone of Tigray National Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics. 4. 158–168. doi:10.5897/JDAE12.026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Gordon, A. & Craig, C.,2001. Rural Non-farm Activities and Poverty Alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Series 14. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Government of Ghana ,1997. Ghana Vision 2020: the First Term Medium -Term Development Plan (1997-2000). Accra, Ghana: National Development Planning Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Government of Kenya, 2007. Kenya Vision 2030. Ministry of State for Planning, National Development, &Vision 2030 and Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and Ministry of Finance. Nairobi, Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Heffernan, C., & Misturelli, F.,2000. The Delivery of Veterinary Services to the Poor: Preliminary findings from Kenya. (Report for DFID’s Animal Health Programme), London DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Hilson, G.,2016. Farming, small-scale mining and rural livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa: A critical overview. The Extractive Industries and Society. 3. 547–563. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.02.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Hogarth, N.J., Belcher, B., Campbell, B., & Stacey, N.,2012. The role of forest-related income in household economies and rural livelihoods in the border-region of Southern China. World Development. 43. 111–123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Kaag, M. et. al., 2004. Ways Forward in Livelihood Research. In D. Kalb, W. Pansters and H. Siebers (Eds.) Globalisation and Development: Themes and Concepts in Current Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Kamanga, P.,Vedeld, P., & Sjaastad, E.,2009. Forest Incomes and Rural Livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 613-624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Kanbur, R.,2003. Qualitative and Quantitative Poverty Appraisal: Complementarities, Tensions, and Way Forward. New Delhi: Permanent Black Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Kenya National Bureaus of Statistical (KNBS),2010. Statistical Abstract, 2009, Nairobi, Government printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Kothari, C. R.,2004. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, (2nd Ed.), New Age International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Lanjouw, J., & Lanjouw, P.,2001. The Rural Nonfarm Sector: Issues and Evidence from Developing Countries. Agricultural Economics, 26(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Loison, S. A., & Loison, S. A.,2016. Rural livelihood diversification in Sub-Saharan Africa: A literature review rural livelihood diversification in Sub-Saharan Africa: A literature review. The Journal of Development Studies. 51. 1125–1138. doi:10.1080/00220388.2015.1046445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Loison, S.A.,2015. Rural Livelihood Diversification in sub – Saharan Africa: A Literature Review. Journal of Development studies, 51(9), 1125-1138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Lufumpa, C.L.,2005. The Poverty-environment Nexus in Africa, African Development Review,17(3), 366-381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Luke, G.J.,1987. Consumption of water by livestock. Resource Management Technical Report Nº 60. Government of Western Australia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Scoones, I.,1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. (Working Paper 72), Brighton, UK: Institute for Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Mandleni, B.,2011. Impact of climate change and adaptation on cattle and sheep farming in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. PhD thesis. University of South Africa, Pretoria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Mandleni, B., & Anim, F.D.K.,2012. Climate change and adaptation of small-scale cattle and sheep farmers. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7 (17), 2639-2646. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Mati, B.M., Mutie, S., Gadain, H., Home, P., & Mtalo, F.,2008. Impacts of land-use/cover changes on the hydrology of the transboundary Mara River, Kenya/Tanzania. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management. 13. 169–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. McDermott, J.J., Rondolph, T.F., & Staal, S.J.,1999. The economics of optimal health and productivity in smallholder livestock systems in developing countries. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties,18(2),399-424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Mduma, J., & Wobst, P.,2005. Determinants of Rural Labor Market Participation in Tanzania. African Studies Quarterly.8(2). http://www.africa.ufl.edu/asq-/v8/v8i2a2.htm. Accessed July 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Minot, N., Epprecht, M., Anh, T.T., & Trung, L.Q.,2006. Income diversification in the northern uplands of Vietnam: IFPRI Research Report No.145. pp. 1-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Mwangi, J.G.,2013. Developing a vibrant livestock industry in East Africa through market driven research. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 10(6), 608. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. National Research Council,1994. Rangeland Health: New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. National Research Council, 1981. Effect of environment on nutrient requirements of domestic animals: Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, National Research Council Subcommittee on Environmental Stress, 152 p. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Nooteboom, G.,2003. A Matter of Style: Social Security and Livelihood in Upland East Java. PhD Thesis, Catholic University of Nijmegen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Nunan, F. U. G., Bahiigwa, G., Muramira, T., Bajracharya, P., Pritchard, D., et. al., 2002. Poverty and the Environment: Measuring the Links: A Study of Poverty-Environment Indicators with Case Studies from Nepal, Nicaragua and Uganda, Environment policy department, issue paper 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Niehof, A.,2004. The significance of diversification for rural livelihood systems. Food Policy, 29(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Nouman, W., Basra, S., Siddiqui, M., Yasmeen, A., Gull, T., & Alcayde, M.A.C.,2014. Pontential of Moringa Oleifera L. as livestock fodder crop: a review. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 38(1), 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Pallas, P.,1986. Water for animals. Land and Water Development Division. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Rome, Italy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Okungu, J., & Opango, P.,2005. Pollution loads into Lake Victoria from the Kenyan catchment. In: Knowledge and Experiences gained from Managing the Lake Victoria Ecosystem, Mallya GA, Katagira FF, Kang’oha G, Mbwana SB, Katunzi EF, Wambede JT, Azza N, Wakwabi E, Njoka SW, Kusewa M, Busulwa H (eds). Osano, O., Nzyuko, D., & Admiraal, W.,2003. The fate of chloroacetalinide herbicides and their degradation products in the Nzoia Basin, Kenya. Ambio: Journal of the Environment. 32. 424–427. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Rao, V. (2002). Experiments in Participatory Econometrics: Improving the Connection Between Economic Analysis and the Real World. Economic and Political Weekly. 1887–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Rae, A.,2008. China’s agriculture, smallholders and trade: driven by the livestock revolution? Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52(3), 283-302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Raini, J.A.,2009. Impact of land use changes on water resources and biodiversity of Lake Nakuru catchment basin, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology.47. 39–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Reardon, T.,1998. Rural Non-farm Income in Developing Countries. In The State of Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Reardon, T.,1997. Using Evidence of Household Income Diversification to Inform Study of the Rural Nonfarm Labor Market in Africa. World Development, 25(5):735-747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Reardon, T., Stamoulis, K., Cruz, M.E., Balisacan, A., Berdegue, J. and Banks, B.,1998. Rural non-farm income in developing countries. In: The state of food and agriculture 1998. FAO Agriculture Series No. 31, FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Ruben, R. and Van den Berg, M.M.,2000. Non-farm employment and rural poverty alleviation in rural Honduras. Development Economics Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Shankland, A.,2000. Analysing Policy for Sustainable Livelihoods. Research Report 49, Sustainable Livelihoods Programme, IDS, University of Sussex. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Sherren, K., Loik, L., & Debner, J. A.,2016. Climate adaptation in “new world” cultural landscapes: The case of Bay of Fundy agricultural dykelands (Nova Scotia, Canada). Land Use Policy. 51. 267–280. `doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Shepherd Andrew, Lucy Scott, Chiara Mariotti, Flora Kessy, Raghav Gaiha, Lucia da Corta, KatharinaHanifnia, et. al., 2014. The Chronic Poverty Report 2014−2015: The Road to Zero Extreme Poverty (Report of the Chronic Poverty Advisory Network). London, Overseas Development Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. Shyamsundar, P.,2002. Poverty--Environment Indicators. Environment Department, World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. Simpson, M. C.,2007. An integrated approach to assess the impacts of tourism on community development and sustainable livelihoods. Community Development Journal, 44(2), 186-208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
77. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & De Haan, C.,2006a. Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options, FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
78. Thornton, P.K.,2010. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transaction: Biological Sciences, 365(1554):2853-2867. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
79. UN,2015. The Millennium Development Goals Report, New York [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
80. Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Bojö, J., Sjaastad, E., & Kobugabe Berg, G.,2007. Forest Environmental Incomes and the Rural Poor, Forest Policy and Economics, 9(7), 869-879. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
81. Wamicha, W.N.1993. Land qualities influencing Agricultural production in the Kieni" intermontane" area, Nyeri district, Kenya. (Paper presented during the 3rd International Workshop of the African Mountains Association (AMA). Nairobi, Kenya [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
82. Weiss, C.R., & Briglauer, W.,2000. Determinants and dynamics of farm diversification(pp.1-20). Department of Food Economics and Consumption Studies, University of Kiel. Working Paper EWP 0002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
83. Winters, P., Cavatassi, R., & Lipper, L.,2006. Sowing the seeds of social relations: The role of social capital in crop diversity (pp. 1-40). ESA Working Paper No. 6, (16) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
84. Windle J., & Rolfe, J.,2005. Diversification choices in agriculture: A choice modelling case study of sugarcane growers. Australian J. Agric. Res. Econ., 49(1), 63-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
85. Wichelns, D., & Oster, J.D.,2006. Sustainable irrigation is necessary and achievable, but direct costs and environmental impacts can be substantial, Agric. Water Manage.,86, 114–127, doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2006.07.014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
86. World Bank, 2007. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC. © World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
87. WRI (World Resources Institute), 2007. Nature’s Benefits in Kenya: An Atlas of Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Washington, DC, and Nairobi: WRI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
88. Yamen, T., 1967. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, (2nd Ed.), New York: Harper and Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]