Effects of Transfrontier Conservation Area Public Tourism Policies on Destination Marketing and Management: A Critical Realist Investigation of Private Sector Perspectives in Zambia's KAZA TFCA

Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs) have emerged as significant instruments for promoting sustainable tourism and regional integration in Southern Africa. However, the effects of TFCA public tourism policies on destination marketing and management remain insufficiently understood, particularly from the perspective of private sector stakeholders. This research gap persists despite the critical role of private sector operators in delivering destination brand promises and managing competitive tourism experiences. This study investigated the impact of TFCA public tourism policies on destination marketing and management in Zambia's Kavango-Zambezi (KAZA) TFCA, employing a critical realist (CR) philosophical framework combined with grounded theory and retroductive analysis. A qualitatively driven case study was conducted in the Livingstone tourism development area, collecting data from 30 private-sector stakeholders through semi-structured interviews and strategic document analysis. Data analysis utilised grounded theory for theory building, thematic analysis for pattern identification, and retroduction to uncover underlying causal mechanisms. The findings reveal that TFCA policies significantly impact destination marketing and management through four underlying mechanisms: power dynamics, institutional inertia, resource constraints, and limited stakeholder engagement. These mechanisms operate on deep structures—including existing policy frameworks, economic systems, and social norms—to produce observable outcomes such as stakeholder conflicts, resistance to change, inequitable benefit distribution, limited infrastructure development, and inefficient policy implementation. The study contributes a context-specific framework for private sector involvement in TFCA public tourism policy-making and strategic agenda-setting. Theoretical contributions include advancing the application of critical realism in tourism policy research beyond its traditional positivist and interpretivist foundations, and demonstrating the utility of mechanism-based explanations for understanding complex multi-stakeholder policy environments. Practical implications emphasise the necessity of collaborative governance, context-sensitive policies, enhanced stakeholder engagement, and adaptive management strategies for successful TFCA implementation and sustainability.

Transfrontier Conservation Areas; KAZA TFCA; Tourism Public Policy; Destination Marketing and Management; Critical Realism; Private Sector Policy Subsystems

1. Amore, A., & Hall, C. M. (2016). From governance to meta-governance in tourism: Re-incorporating politics, interests and values in the analysis of tourism governance. Tourism Recreation Research, 41(2), 109–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Avenier, M. J., & Thomas, C. (2015). Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 20(1), 61–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baggio, R. (2008). Symptoms of complexity in a tourism system. Tourism Analysis, 13(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baggio, R. (2013). Studying complex tourism systems: A novel approach based on networks derived from a time series. XIV April International Academic Conference on Economics and Social Development, Moscow. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Beritelli, P., Bieger, T., & Laesser, C. (2014). From destination governance to destination leadership – defining and exploring the significance with the help of a systemic perspective. Tourism Review, 69(1), 25–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bhaskar, R. (2013). Critical realism and the quantitative/qualitative divide. Journal of Critical Realism, 12(3), 267–279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Edwards, P. K., O'Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S. (2014). Studying organizations using critical realism: A practical guide. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hall, C. M. (2019). Resilience theory and tourism. In J. Saarinen & A. M. Gill (Eds.), Resilient destinations and tourism (pp. 34–47). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Heylighen, F., & Gershenson, C. (2006). Complexity and philosophy. In J. Bogg & R. Geyer (Eds.), Complexity, science and society (pp. 117–134). Radcliffe Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1998). Policy subsystem configurations and policy change: Operationalizing the postpositivist analysis of the politics of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 26(3), 466–481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jenkins, J. M., Hall, C. M., & Mkono, M. (2014). Tourism and public policy: Contemporary debates and future directions. In A. A. Lew, C. M. Hall, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to tourism (pp. 542–555). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jessop, B. (2016). The state: Past, present, future. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Martínez, R. M., Galván, M. O., & Lafuente, A. M. G. (2014). Public policies and tourism marketing: An analysis of the competitiveness of tourism in Morelia, Mexico, and Alcala de Henares, Spain. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mazanec, J. A., & Strasser, H. (2007). Perceptions-based analysis of tourism products and service providers. Journal of Travel Research, 45(4), 387–401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mazumder, M. N. H., Al-Mamun, A., Al-Amin, A. Q., & Mohiuddin, M. (2011). Economic impact of tourism – A review of the literature methodologies and their uses: 1969-2011. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(7), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Meuleman, L. (2008). Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks, and markets. Physica-Verlag. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mingers, J. (2011). The contribution of systemic thought to critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 10(3), 303–330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ministry of Tourism. (2015). The Zambia tourism policy. Government of the Republic of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ministry of Tourism. (2018). Zambia Tourism Master Plan 2018-2038. Government of the Republic of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pike, S. (2008). Destination marketing: An integrated marketing communication approach. Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pike, S., & Page, S. J. (2014). Destination marketing organizations and destination marketing: A narrative analysis of the literature. Tourism Management, 41, 202–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Reinhold, S., Laesser, C., & Beritelli, P. (2015). 2014 St. Gallen Consensus on Destination Management. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 4(2), 137–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ritchie, J. R. B., & Crouch, G. I. (2003). The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism perspective. CABI Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. SADC. (2011). Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area Treaty. Southern African Development Community. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Scott, S. G. (2011). Critical realism and the tourism industry. Tourism Review, 66(1), 14–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Suich, H., Busch, J., & Barbancho, N. (2005). Economic impacts of transfrontier conservation areas: Baseline of tourism in the Kavango-Zambezi TFCA. Conservation International South Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Svennevig, J. (1997). Abduction as a methodological approach to the study of spoken interaction. Norskrift, 103, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Timothy, D. J. (2019). Tourism development: A global perspective. In T. Jamal & M. Robinson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of tourism studies (pp. 193–206). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 551–561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tsoukas, H. (2006). Strategy and meaning: Engaging critical realism. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1815–1837. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. UNWTO. (2021). World tourism barometer. World Tourism Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2007). Collaborative destination marketing: A case study of Elkhart County, Indiana. Tourism Management, 28(3), 863–875. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wynn, D., & Williams, C. K. (2012). Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787–810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]