Preparedness on Outcome-Based Education Instructional Methods: Foundations for Formulating an Effective Preservice Science Teacher Preparation and Scaffolding Model in Botswana

This study explored the extent of preparedness of science lecturers and completing preservice teachers enrolled on science education programs at teacher preparation institutions in Botswana on implementing exemplary instructional methods following the national adoption of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) curriculum. Using a descriptive survey design, data was collected from a diverse sample of science lecturers and final-year preservice science teachers to evaluate their readiness to apply contemporary, exemplary instructional methods. Findings reveal a sub-optimal level of preparedness, with notable gaps in pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration, and the practical application of OBE principles in both science lecturers and student teachers. Although science lecturers reported being adequately prepared to support learning through collaborative, inductive, and experiential instructional methods, their classroom practices suggested low frequency of using these methods, with few activities that provoked critical thinking or problem-solving skills. Final-year student teachers were found to be minimally prepared to teach using these exemplary instructional methods, rarely engaged in inductive instructional activities, and mostly involved in teacher-directed instructions, implying that lecturers did not model these methods consistently during teacher preparation. The narrative evidence that contextualized the numerical data further revealed that large class sizes, heavy workloads, shortages of teaching and learning resources, and pressure to complete the syllabus constrained both lecturers’ and student teachers’ ability to implement collaborative, inductive, and experiential learning approaches. These insights highlight contextual and systemic factors which require an urgent need for targeted professional development initiatives, mentorship programs, curriculum revisions in teacher education, and stronger school-university partnerships to bridge the gap between preservice teacher preparation and classroom practice, support early-career teacher development and promote sustained improvements in instructional quality. Enhancing teacher preparedness in line with OBE objectives holds significant implications for improving student outcomes, advancing educational equity, and strengthening Botswana’s position in global STEM

Preservice teachers, Outcome-Based Education, Exemplary Instructional Methods, Self-Efficacy

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braaten, M. (2019). Bridging theory and practice in preservice teacher education: Challenges and solutions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bwembya, I., Daka, H., & Botha, B. (2024). Transformative pedagogies: Cultivating educators for 21st century graduates. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(5), 289 295. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2024.4.5.3231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bwembya, I., Daka, H., & Chomba, J. (2024). Achieving accountability and quality education through assessments: A comprehensive exploration of assessment practices in Zambia. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(6), 600 607. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2024.4.6.3481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Canrinus, E. T., et al. (2017). Scaffolding learning in teacher education: Connecting campus and field experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chizyuka, M., & Daka, H. (2021). The relationship between organisational structure and the provision of quality education: A comparative study of a private secondary school and a public secondary school. Global Scientific Journal, 9(12), 2169–2187. https://www.globalscientificjournal.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Daka, H., Banda, S. S. & Namafe, C. M. (2017). Course management, Teaching and Assessing Undergraduates at theMedical School of the University of Zambia. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 4 (10), 10 – 18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Curriculum coherence and science teaching. Science Education, 96(3), 573–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Government of Botswana, National Planning Commission. (2017). National Development Plan 11: April 2017 – March 2023 (Vol. 1). National Planning Commission. https://www.npc.gov.bw/national-development-plans [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Haney, J. J., & McArthur, J. (2002). Constructivist teaching strategies in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(1), 65–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Iloanya, J. (2019). Preparing the 21st Century Teacher for the Implementation of Outcomes-Based Education: The Practical Reality. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(7), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-7-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Joram, E., et al. (2020). Research-practice gap in science education: Barriers and strategies. Science Education International, 31(4), 283–300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Koketso, J. (2020). Effects of Learning Outcomes on Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Social Studies in Tertiary Institutions: Analysis of Selected OBE-Compliant Course Outlines at the University of Botswana. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v5i2.3436 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Koosimile, A., & Suping, S. S. (2011). Pre-service teachers' attempts at debating contemporary issues in science education: A case study from Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 458–464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ketlhoilwe, M., & Silo, N. (2016). Change Project-Based Learning in Teacher Education in Botswana. In Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Understanding and developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2191–2203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lysenko, L., et al. (2014). Traditional versus contemporary teaching methods: Implications for science education. Teaching and Learning, 35(3), 315–333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Machila, N., Chipindi, F. M., Chiputa, E., & Kaani, B. (2022). A critical analysis of learner performance in the content-based and outcome-based secondary school history curriculum in Zambia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(10), 381-390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mangope, B., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2015). Preparing Teachers for Inclusive Education in Botswana: The Role of Professional Development. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 18(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.9782/2159-4341-18.2.60 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Masaiti, G., Kakupa, P., & Mupeta, S. (2023). Re-imagining assessment in higher education: Creating alternative pathways for inclusive and democratic assessments in Zambian higher education institutions. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, 7(2), 20–39. https://www.sotl-south-journal.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Motlhabanyane, L., & Tsheko, G. (2023). Assessing Training of Primary School Teacher’s Readiness to Implement Outcome Based Education in South East Region, Botswana. International Journal of Arts and Social Science, 6(9), 156–168. www.ijassjournal.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Moyo, S., & Mwanza, D.S. (2025). Common Challenges Teachers Face in the Teaching of Literacy and Language in Multilingual Learning Contexts in Livingstone District, Zambia. European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 136-145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nilsson, P., & Karlsson, J. (2019). Components of science teacher knowledge: Structure and interrelations. Science Education, 103(2), 281–297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Omenka, J. E., & Otor, E. E. (2015). Influence of classroom management on students’ academic achievement in science and mathematics in Oju Local Government Area of Benue State. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 4(4), 36–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pansiri, N. O., & Bulawa, P. (2013). An analysis of teachers’ status in crisis of public service reforms in Botswana. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(12), 233–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Republic of Botswana. (2015). Education and training sector strategic plan (ETSSP 2015–2020). Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Schneider, B., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2020). Supporting the development of core ideas through inquiry-based science education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0202-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sikorski, T. R., & Hammer, D. (2017). Student engagement in scientific discussions. Science Education, 101(4), 553–575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNICEF Innocenti. (2024). Teachers for All: Investing in Botswana’s Teacher Workforce. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/media/7826/file/UNICEF Innocenti Teachers All Botswana Report 2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Veal, W., et al. (2016). Reform-based science instruction: Concepts and methods. Science Education Review, 15(3), 22–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2018). Collaborative learning strategies in science classrooms. Science Education, 102(5), 837–860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Developing Localized Reading Materials: Addressing comprehensions Level of Key Stage 1 and 2 Learners