Livelihood Extension Program Administration, Stakeholders Engagement, and Organizational Performance of Selected State Universities and Colleges (SUCS) in National Capital Region: Basis for Enhancement Towards Sustainability

This study examines the administration, stakeholder engagement, and organizational performance of Livelihood Extension Programs in selected State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in the National Capital Region, aiming to propose a sustainability model for long-term program effectiveness. Using a descriptive research design, data were collected through structured surveys from 1,310 respondents, including school administrators, extension coordinators, community partners, and community recipients. The study assessed key dimensions of program administration, stakeholder participation, and organizational performance, and analyzed their interrelationships and impact on sustainability.
Findings indicate that Livelihood Extension Programs are generally well-administered, with strong leadership, adequate resources, effective planning, and robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. Stakeholder engagement is evident across all dimensions, including sustainability, productivity, and community transformation, while organizational performance demonstrates significant support for economic, community, and skills development. Statistical analyses reveal no significant differences in assessment across respondent groups, indicating standardized implementation, and highlight a strong positive relationship between program administration, stakeholder engagement, and organizational performance. Minor operational challenges were identified, suggesting areas for continuous improvement. The proposed Sustainability Model is rated highly in terms of suitability, acceptability, and feasibility, demonstrating its potential to optimize program management, align institutional and community objectives, and enhance long-term socio-economic impact.

Livelihood Extension Program, Stakeholder

1. Alvarez, R., & De Guzman, L. (2021). The dual impact of extension programs on community welfare and institutional advancement. Philippine Journal of Educational Development, 15(2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brown, T., & Garcia, M. (2023). Maximizing student engagement in community extension programs. Journal of Higher Education Research, 28(1), 12-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. David, P., & Garcia, R. (2022). Standardized frameworks for stakeholder engagement in higher education extension programs. Asian Journal of University Extension Services, 10(3), 101-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dela Cruz, F., & Ramirez, E. (2023). Assessment of livelihood programs in Northern Mindanao: Administration and community impact. Mindanao Educational Review, 7(1), 55-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Del Rosario, L., & Mateo, A. (2022). Designing sustainability frameworks for community-based university programs. Philippine Journal of Sustainable Education, 9(2), 88-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Delgado, P., & Cruz, R. (2021). The role of structured skills development programs in sustainable community development. Journal of Philippine Higher Education, 12(1), 33-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. De Guzman, L., & Manalang, J. (2021). Consistency in SUC livelihood and extension program implementation. Philippine Educational Administration Review, 14(2), 70-85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Joshua, M., Santos, E., & Reyes, D. (2025). Community extension programs and institutional performance in Philippine State Universities. Journal of Community Development in Higher Education, 3(1), 22-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lim, J., & Bautista, R. (2021). Feasibility assessment of sustainability models in higher education extension programs. Philippine Journal of Educational Policy, 8(2), 15-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Martinez, A., & Soriano, K. (2023). Flexible models for sustainable extension programs in higher education. Journal of Education and Community Development, 11(1), 50-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nelson, P., & Phillips, G. (2023). Stakeholder involvement as a determinant of success in university livelihood programs. Asian Journal of Community Engagement, 7(2), 101-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Villanueva, M., & Santos, R. (2022). Effective planning and resource allocation in university extension programs. Philippine Journal of Higher Education Research, 18(1), 44-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Mentoring Skills and Career Progression of Business Educators in Colleges of Education in South-West, Nigeria
• Entrepreneurship Education as Predictor of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business Education Undergraduates in Public Universities in Edo and Delta States, Nigeria
• Management Information Systems (Mis), Decision Making and Business Sustainability in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria