Corporate Governance Research in Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

Hasna Nur Laila

Departement of Master Accounting, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Milah Dwi Anggraini

Departement of Master Accounting, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Retno Wulandari

Departement of Master Accounting, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Eni Wuryani

Departement of Master Accounting, Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200115

Subject Category: Corporate

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 1530-1545

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-17

Accepted: 2025-12-24

Published: 2026-01-01

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review the literature on corporate governance (CG) in Microfinance Institutions (MFls). Specifically, this study identifies how CG is defined and operationalized, examines its role in improving transparency and accountability, and maps the antecedents, mechanisms, challenges, and consequences of CG in the context of the dual mission of MFls. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method following the PRISMA guidelines. English articles from the Scopus database were selected based on specified keywords. After eliminating duplicate, irrelevant, and inaccessible articles, 50 articles were analyzed using content analysis to identify patterns of concepts and empirical findings related to MFI governance. The review results show that CG in MFIs has unique characteristics due to its dual objectives: financial sustainability and social outreach. CG mechanisms such as board independence, gender diversity, audit quality, and board committees play a positive role in improving financial and social performance. The main challenges include conflicts of interest, founder dominance, information asymmetry, institutional voids, and the risk of mission drift. The effectiveness of CG is greatly influenced by law, culture, ownership structure, and institutional conditions. This study is limited to English-language articles in the Scopus database. Future research needs to expand the scope of cross-country data, use stronger econometric methods to address endogeneity, and explore the internal dynamics of boards through a qualitative approach. The results confirm that strengthening governance is necessary for regulators, donors, and MFI management to improve transparency, reduce risk, and ensure the long-term sustainability of institutions. This study is the first SLR to focus specifically on CG in MFIs. It consolidates scattered findings, develops an integrative CG framework, and provides directions for future research.

Keywords

Corporate governance; Microfincane Institutions; Social Performance

Downloads

References

1. Aboagye, A. Q., & Otieku, J. (2010). Are Ghanaian MFIs’ performance associated with corporate governance? Corporate Governance, 10(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011051938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adambekova, A., Adambekov, N., Randhir, T. O., Adambekova, Z., & Yezhebekov, M. (2024). Microcrediting and Investment Analysis in the Context of Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17110484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adem, M., & Dsouza, P. K. (2024). Impact of Board Characteristics on Firm Performance: Evidence from Ethiopian Microfinance Institutions. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241276957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Augustine, D. (2012). Good Practice in Corporate Governance: Transparency, Trust, and Performance in the Microfinance Industry. Business and Society, 51(4), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312448623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bakar, N. M., Abdul Rahman, R., & Ibrahim, Z. (2020). Client protection and sustainable performance in microfinance institution. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(4), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2019-0127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bakker, A., Schaveling, J., & Nijhof, A. (2014). Governance and microfinance institutions. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 14(5), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2014-0032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beisland, L. A., Mersland, R., & Randøy, T. (2014). The association between microfinance rating scores and corporate governance: A global survey. International Review of Financial Analysis, 35, 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.10.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Beisland, L. A., Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2015). Audit Quality and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Microfinance Industry. International Journal of Auditing, 19(3), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, A. E. (2014). Corporate governance in microfinance institutions: Board composition and the ability to face institutional voids. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(5), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dato, M. H., Mersland, R., & Mori, N. (2018). Board committees and performance in microfinance institutions: Evidence from Ethiopia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(2), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-08-2016-0216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Djan, K. O., & Mersland, R. (2017). Does Religious Affiliation Influence the Design of Corporate Governance? Evidence from the Global Microfinance Industry. Strategic Change, 26(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Djan, K. O., & Mersland, R. (2022). Are NGOs and cooperatives similar or different? A global survey using microfinance data. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(2), 641–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09567-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Galema, R., Lensink, R., & Mersland, R. (2012). Do Powerful CEOs Determine Microfinance Performance? Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 718–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01046.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gohar, R., & Batool, A. (2015). Effect of Corporate Governance on Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Case from Pakistan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51, S94–S106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1080559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gupta, N., & Mirchandani, A. (2020). Corporate governance and performance of microfinance institutions: recent global evidences. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9446-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hossain, S., Galbreath, J., Hasan, M. M., & Randøy, T. (2024). All in the family? The impact of founder directors and family governance on microfinance institutions’ social performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 32(2), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hussain, M. D., & Ahmed, I. (2021). Governance and Double Bottom Line Performance of Microfinance Institutions: Evidence from Bangladesh. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hussain, M. D., Rahman, I. K. A., Hossin, M. S., & Said, J. (2019). Board Leadership Structure and Microfinance Performance for Better Governance Practices in Bangladesh. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339147019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Iqbal, S., Nawaz, A., & Ehsan, S. (2019). Financial performance and corporate governance in microfinance: Evidence from Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 60, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2018.10.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kamau, G., Aosa, E., Machuki, V., & Pokhariyal, G. (2018). Corporate Governance, Strategic Choices and Performance of Financial Institutions in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(7), 169. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v13n7p169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Khan, A., & Shireen, S. (2020). Drivers of financial and operational efficiency of MFIs: empirical evidences from Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Benchmarking, 27(9), 2679–2697. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kyereboah-Coleman, A., & Osei, K. A. (2008). Outreach and profitability of microfinance institutions: The role of governance. Journal of Economic Studies, 35(3), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580810887797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Labie, M. (2001). Corporate governance in microfinance organizations: Along and winding road. Management Decision, 39(4), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740110391466 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Makuya, V. (2024). Need for achievement and financial performance: a mediating role of board creativity. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2315314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mersland, R. (2009). The Cost of Ownership in Microfinance Organizations. World Development, 37(2), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mersland, R. (2011). The governance of non-profit micro finance institutions: Lessons from history. Journal of Management and Governance, 15(3), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9116-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mersland, R., Randøy, T., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2011). The impact of international influence on microbanks’ performance: A global survey. International Business Review, 20(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.07.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2009). Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(4), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.11.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mia, M. A. (2022). Do women on boards affect employee benefits? Evidence from the global microfinance industry. Economics Letters, 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mia, M. A., Sangwan, S., & Hossain, M. I. (2025). Board gender diversity and donations in the microfinance industry: evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 15(4), 896–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2393237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mishra, A. P., & Pahi, D. (2025). Governance Practice and Efficiency Metrics in Global Microfinance Institutions (pp. 3–23). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6366-8_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Moalla, M., Salhi, B., & Jarboui, A. (2020). An empirical investigation of factors influencing the environmental reporting quality: evidence from France. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(7), 966–984. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2020-0065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mori, N., Randøy, T., & Golesorkhi, S. (2013). Determinants of Board Structure in Microfinance Institutions: Evidence from East Africa. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 12(3), 323–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972652713512916 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nalukenge, I., Nkundabanyanga, S. K., & Ntayi, J. M. (2018). Corporate governance, ethics, internal controls and compliance with IFRS. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 16(4), 764–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-08-2017-0064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nalukenge, I., Tauringana, V., & Ntayi, J. M. (2017). Corporate governance and internal controls over financial reporting in Ugandan MFIs. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(3), 294–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-02-2016-0018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Nawaz, A., Iqbal, S., & Ehsan, S. (2018). Does Social Performance Drive Corporate Governance Mechanism In Case of Asian MFIs? An Issue of Endogeneity. Global Business Review, 19(4), 988–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918772961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Nya, M. T., Kouao, G. S., & Tchuigoua, H. T. (2023). Governance quality and international accounting standards adoption by microfinance institutions. Revue Recherche En Sciences de Gestion-Management Sciences-Ciencias de Gestión, 157–185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Okoye, N., & Siwale, J. (2017). Microfinance regulation and effective corporate governance in Nigeria and Zambia. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-06-2016-0054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Poluan, S. J., Utami, I., Suharti, L., & Usmanij, P. A. (2024). Strategies for Fostering Social Entrepreneurship Sustainability and Benefits in Microfinance Institutions. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 14(1), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2024.0119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Saeed, A., Javed, A. Y., & Noreen, U. (2018). Microfinancing, governance, and performance: a South Asian perspective. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 23(46), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-01-2017-0014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Shettima, U., & Dzolkarnaini, N. (2018). Board characteristics and microfinance institutions’ performance: Panel data evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-01-2017-0006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ssekiziyivu, B., Mwesigwa, R., Bananuka, J., & Namusobya, Z. (2018). Corporate governance practices in microfinance institutions: Evidence from Uganda. Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1488508 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Strøm, R. Ø., D’Espallier, B., & Mersland, R. (2014). Female leadership, performance, and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 42(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.01.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Thrikawala, S., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2015). An Empirical Analysis Of Corporate Governance Impact On Outreach Of Microfinance InstitutionS (MFIS). In Corporate Ownership & Control (Vol. 13, Issue 1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Thrikawala, S., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2016). Board structure-performance relationship in microfinance institutions (MFIs) in an emerging economy. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 16(5), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2015-0166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Thrikawala, S., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2017). Dynamic endogeneity and corporate governance-performance relationship: Lessons from the microfinance sector. Journal of Economic Studies, 44(5), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-12-2015-0220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Thulasi, A. R., & Dharmaraj, A. (2025). An Analytical Study on Corporate Governance Determinants in MFIs in Kerala (Vol. 1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tricker, R. (2019). Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics, and Leadership. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Tumwebaze, Z., Bananuka, J., Alinda, K., & Dorcus, K. (2020). Intellectual capital: mediator of board of directors’ effectiveness and adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(2), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2020-0076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Visconti, R. M., & Quirici, M. C. (2014). The Impact Of Innovation And Technology On Microfinance Sustainable Governance. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2650339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Vishwakarma, R. (2017). Women on board and its impact on performance: Evidence from microfinance sector. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Vranovci, S. (2025). Exploring the Relationship between Client Protection Practices and Sustainable Performance in the Microfinance Sector: A Study of Kosovo’s Microfinance Institutions. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 22, 574–583. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2025.22.51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Wamba, L. D., Bengono, I. B., Sahut, J. M., & Teulon, F. (2018). Governance and performance of MFIs: the Cameroon case. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9381-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles