Environmental and Health Impacts of Geothermal Operations in Tiaty East Sub- County, Baringo County, Kenya: A Community-Based Statistical Analysis

Authors

Sapan C. Anne

Physical and Biological Sciences Department, Kabarak University (Kenya)

Akumu Edwin O.

Physical and Biological Sciences Department, Kabarak University (Kenya)

Kitetu J. John

Physical and Biological Sciences Department, Kabarak University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12120085

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 12/12 | Page No: 988-999

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-10

Accepted: 2025-12-16

Published: 2026-01-12

Abstract

Background: Geothermal energy is widely regarded as a clean and reliable renewable energy source, particularly in tectonically active regions such as the East African Rift System. Kenya has made substantial investments in geothermal power development; however, the rapid expansion of geothermal infrastructure has raised concerns regarding its localized environmental and public health impacts. In Tiaty East Sub-County, Baringo County, geothermal development occurs within ecologically sensitive landscapes and community dependent resource systems. This study assessed the impacts of geothermal power operations on vegetation cover, water quality, and community health to inform sustainable geothermal development.
Materials and Methods: A mixed-methods approach was adopted using an Integrated Impact Assessment Framework. Primary data were collected through 379 structured household questionnaires and key informant interviews. Water quality assessment employed a quasi-experimental design, comparing boreholes, Lake Baringo, and seasonal ponds within geothermal zones against distilled water as a control. Physical and chemical parameters were analyzed using standard laboratory procedures. Vegetation dynamics were assessed using GIS and remote sensing techniques, including land use/land cover classification and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) analysis of Landsat imagery from 2017, 2020, and 2025. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS (version 21.0) through descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and t-tests at p < 0.05, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed.
Results: Vegetation degradation was significantly associated with geothermal operations (χ² = 37.21, p = 0.013), with healthy vegetation cover declining from approximately 18% in 2017 to 6% in 2025 and a corresponding increase in bare land. Water sources exhibited significantly elevated temperatures, turbidity, fluoride, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, nitrate, and phosphate levels compared to distilled water (p < 0.05), indicating geothermal and hydrogeochemical influence. Community perceptions corroborated laboratory findings, identifying water shortages (67%), contamination, and increased water temperatures as key concerns. A significant association was observed between geothermal activities and increased disease prevalence (χ² = 31.14, p = 0.008), with respiratory illnesses predominating. Most respondents (>60%) considered existing mitigation measures ineffective.
Conclusion: Geothermal power development in Tiaty East Sub-County has resulted in measurable degradation of vegetation, deterioration of water quality, and adverse public health outcomes. Strengthened environmental governance, continuous monitoring, and community-led mitigation strategies are essential to align geothermal energy development with environmental sustainability and public wellbeing.

Keywords

Geothermal energy; vegetation change

Downloads

References

1. Glassley WE. Geothermal energy: renewable energy and the environment. CRC press; 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Stober I, Bucher K. Thermal Structure of the Earth. InGeothermal Energy: From Theoretical Models to Exploration and Development 2021; (pp. 1-19). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Birkle PE, Bundschuh JO. High and low enthalpy geothermal resources and potentials. Central America: Geology, resources and hazards. 2007; 2:707-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gutiérrez-Negrín LC. Evolution of worldwide geothermal power 2020–2023. Geothermal Energy. 2024; (1):14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Avci AC, Kaygusuz O, Kaygusuz K. Geothermal energy for sustainable development. Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science. 2020; 9(1):1414-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elbarbary S, Zaher MA, Saibi H, Fowler AR, Ravat D, Marzouk H. Thermal structure of the African continent based on magnetic data: Future geothermal renewable energy explorations in Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022; 158:112088. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Omenda P, Ofwona C, Mangi P. Kenya: The Most Successful Geothermal Development in Africa. InGeothermal Power Generation 2025; (pp. 863-891). Elsevier Science Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gutiérrez-Negrín LC. Evolution of worldwide geothermal power 2020–2023. Geothermal Energy. 2024; 12(1):14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dhar A, Naeth MA, Jennings PD, Gamal El-Din M. Geothermal energy resources: potential environmental impact and land reclamation. Environmental Reviews. 2020; 28(4):415-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hu Y, Cheng H, Tao S. Environmental and human health impacts of geothermal exploitation in China and mitigation strategies. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2023;53(11):1173-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kachila PJ. Assessment of the Effects Of Geothermal Well Drilling Occupation on the Safety and Health Status Of Workers in Kenya: A Case Study of Menengai Geothermal Prospect (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-IEET) 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mariita NO. The impact of large-scale renewable energy development on the poor: environmental and socio-economic impact of a power plant on a poor rural community in Kenya. Energy Policy. 2002; 30(11-12):1119-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Abdi AM, Murayama T, Nishikizawa S, Suwanteep K, Mariita NO. Determinants of community acceptance of geothermal energy projects: A case study on a geothermal energy project in Kenya. Renewable Energy Focus. 2024;50:100594. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Omenge PM. Evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental and social impact assessment in conflict identification and prevention for renewable energy projects in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, Egerton University). 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Omenda PA. The geology and geothermal activity of the East African Rift. Proceedings of the Short Course VII on Exploration for Geothermal Resources, Organized by UNU-GTP, GDC and KenGen, Naivasha, Kenya. 2010;31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Axtmann RC. Environmental Impact of a Geothermal Power Plant: Chemical and thermal effluents from a New Zealand plant rival those from fossil or nuclear fuel technologies. Science. 1975;187(4179):795-803. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pasqua C, Chiozzi P, Verdoya M. Geothermal play types along the East Africa rift system: examples from Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania. Energies. 2023;16(4):1656. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ball PJ. A review of geothermal technologies and their role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the USA. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 2021; 143(1):010903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Witkowski WT, Łucka M, Guzy A, Sudhaus H, Barańska A, Hejmanowski R. Impact of mining-induced seismicity on land subsidence occurrence. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2024;301:113934. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Cott M. Noise Management Strategies for Geothermal Projects. InINTER-NOISE and NOISECON Congress and Conference Proceedings 2025; (Vol. 271, No. 2, pp. 235-244). Institute of Noise Control Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Clark CE, Harto CB, Sullivan JL, Wang MQ. Water use in the development and operation of geothermal power plants. Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Soltani M, Kashkooli FM, Souri M, Rafiei B, Jabarifar M, Gharali K, Nathwani JS. Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;140:110750. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Manente G, Lazzaretto A, Bardi A, Paci M. Geothermal power plant layouts with water absorption and reinjection of H2S and CO2 in fields with a high content of non-condensable gases. Geothermics. 2019;78:70-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Demir C, Yetiş Ü, Ünlü K. Identification of waste management strategies and waste generation factors for thermal power plant sector wastes in Turkey. Waste Management & Research. 2019; 37(3):210-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nkinyam CM, Ujah CO, Asadu CO, Kallon DV. Exploring geothermal energy as a sustainable source of energy: A systemic review. Unconventional Resources. 2025:100149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rotich IK, Chepkirui H, Musyimi PK, Kipruto G. Geothermal energy in Kenya: evaluating health impacts and environmental challenges. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2024;82:101522. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles