Exploring the Influence of Teacher-Student Relationships, Technology Integration, and Classroom Environment on Student Engagement in Mathematics

This study examines the factors influencing student engagement in mathematics, with particular emphasis on teacher–student relationships, classroom technology integration, and the classroom environment within a Philippine educational context. Data were gathered through student surveys and analyzed using regression techniques to determine the influence of each factor on mathematics engagement. The findings indicate that positive teacher–student relationships significantly enhance student engagement, as supportive, trusting, and communicative interactions encourage students’ active participation in learning. Classroom technology integration also shows a meaningful positive influence, as the effective use of digital tools increases students’ interest, motivation, and involvement in mathematics lessons. Among the factors examined, the classroom environment emerges as the strongest predictor of student engagement, highlighting the importance of a supportive, organized, inclusive, and stimulating learning atmosphere. Overall, the results underscore the critical role of nurturing strong teacher–student relationships, implementing technology meaningfully, and cultivating positive classroom environments in promoting student engagement in mathematics, which may ultimately contribute to improved learning outcomes and sustained interest in the subject.

Classroom Engagement, Student Engagement, Teacher-Student Relationships, Techonology Integration

1. Agricula, J., Maderazo, C., Abejuela, R., Ros, A., Benitez, J., Gabuna, B., Añonuev, R. A., & Ocampo, D. M. (2024). Effects of technology-assisted on the level of performance and engagement of BSED mathematics. SHS Web of Conferences, 182, 02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418202002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almerino, P., Guinocor, M., Mamites, I., Lumayag, C., Villaganas, M. A., & Capuyan, M. (2020). Mathematics performance of students in a Philippine state university. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alrajeh, T. S., & Shindel, B. W. (2020). Student engagement and math teachers support. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10282.167-180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). “It gives you that sense of hope”: An exploration of technology use to mediate student engagement with mathematics. Heliyon, 6(1), e02945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02945 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Berlin, R., & Cohen, J. (2020). The convergence of emotionally supportive learning environments and college and career ready mathematical engagement in upper elementary classrooms. AERA Open, 6(3), 233285842095761. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420957612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819 7. Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2021). Student engagement in a flipped secondary mathematics classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1455–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10213-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dahal, N., Luitel, B. C., & Pant, B. P. (2019). Teacher-students relationship and its potential impact on mathematics learning. Mathematics Education Forum Chitwan, 4(4), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.3126/mefc.v4i4.26357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Doño, M. J. A., & Mangila, B. B. (2021). Mathematics teacher’s engagement and students’ motivation to learn mathematics. Infinity Journal, 10(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p285-300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kelly, S., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Teacher Support and Engagement in Math and Science: Evidence from the High School Longitudinal Study. ˜the œHigh School Journal/˜the œHigh School Journal, 99(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2016.0005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kusmaryono, I., & Wijayanti, D. (2023). Exploration of students’ mathematics learning experiences and engagement outside the classroom. International Journal of Education, 16(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v16i2.48399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Llorente, H. M. C., & Tado, P. P. (2024). The mediating effect of problem-based learning on the relationship between technology integration and student engagement in mathematics. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(4), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i41310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Student engagement in mathematics flipped classrooms: Implications of journal publications from 2011 to 2020. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Marpa, E. P. (2020). Technology in the teaching of mathematics: An analysis of teachers’ attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal on Studies in Education, 3(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2019b). Teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement in high school: Does the number of negative and positive relationships with teachers matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. OECD. (2021). PISA 2021 assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics, and science. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5b6b0c5b-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pua, M. J. A. D., & Macutay, M. V. (2020). Teaching-learning environment for effective mathematics classroom. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/TEACHING-LEARNINGENVIRONMENT-FOR-EFFECTIVE-Pua-Macutay/d782f6a23b8aafb6dcea86b7257dabbad7143d51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Quin, D. (2016). Longitudinal and contextual associations between Teacher–Student relationships and student engagement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Shé, C. N., Fhloinn, E. N., & Mac an Bhaird, C. (2023). Student engagement with technology-enhanced resources in mathematics in higher education: A review. Mathematics, 11(3), 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030787 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples