The Role of Metaphor in Legal Judgments: Law as a Creative Narrative
Authors
European University of Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
European University of Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-07
Accepted: 2026-01-12
Published: 2026-01-16
Abstract
According to this study, judicial opinions are creative narratives with metaphor acting as their primary discursive engine rather than being merely objective applications of the law. Beyond the conventional understanding of law as a purely objective and logical system, this study explores how judges use fundamental metaphors like "the wall of separation," "the marketplace of ideas," or "the stream of commerce" to organise legal reasoning, influence how facts are perceived, and ultimately persuade. Through an analysis of landmark rulings, this paper shows that these metaphors are not just decorative; they are part of the legal meaning, forming the conceptual frameworks that are used to comprehend and settle disputes. Consequently, this narrative and metaphorical process reveals law as a deeply humanistic and rhetorical practice, where judicial storytelling, powered by metaphor, plays a critical role in constructing legal reality and legitimizing judicial authority. The research concludes that acknowledging this creative dimension is essential for a critical and comprehensive understanding of jurisprudence.
Keywords
Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), Judicial Rhetoric, Legal Semiotics, Legal Metaphor, Judicial Reasoning, Legal Narrative, Law and Literature.
Downloads
References
1. Abrams v. United States, 250 (U.S. 1919). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Amsterdam, A. G. (2000). Minding the law. . Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Amsterdam, A. G. (n.d.). Minding the law. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Anwar Hossain Chowdhury v. Bangladesh, 41 DLR (Bangladesh)., 165 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Aristotle. (1995). Poetics (S. Halliwell, Trans.). Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Berger, M. &. (2020). Metaphors in the law: A corpus-based analysis. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Brooks, P. &. (1996). Law's stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Brooks, P. &. (1996). Law's stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Brooks, P. &. (1996). Law's stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law. . Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brooks, P. &. (1996). Law's stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law. . Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cover, R. M. (1983). The Supreme Court, 1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review, 1-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Cover, R. M. (1983). The Supreme Court, 1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review, 4–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Cover, R. M. (1983). The Supreme Court, 1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review,, 4–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Cover, R. M. (1983). The Supreme Court,1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review, 4–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Douglas, L. (2015). The image of justice: Blindness, insight, and the symbolic role of justice. . Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General), A.C. 124 (J.C.P.C 1930). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gewirtz, P. (1996). Narrative and rhetoric in the law. In P. Brooks & P. Gewirtz (Eds.), Law's stories. Yale University Press., 2–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. . Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. . Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Glucksberg, S. &. (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 1541–1558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Hamburger, P. (2002). Separation of church and state. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Hart, H. L. (1994). The concept of law. Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Hogg, P. W. (2007). Constitutional law of Canada (5th ed.). Thomson Carswell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ingber, S. (1984). The marketplace of ideas: A legitimizing myth. Duke Law Journal, 1–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ingber, S. (1984). The marketplace of ideas: A legitimizing myth. . Duke Law Journal, 1–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Ingber, S. (1984). The marketplace of ideas: A legitimizing mythl. . Duke Law Journal, 1–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Kennedy. (1986). Freedom and constraint in adjudication: A critical phenomenology. Journal of Legal Education, 6, 518-562. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1461 ( SC India 1973 ). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Lakoff, G. &. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Lakoff, G. &. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Lakoff, G. &. (2003). Metaphors we live by. . University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Lakoff, G. &. (2003). Metaphors we live by. . University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Lakoff, G. &. (2003). Metaphors we Live By. . University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Miller, C. A. (2010). The myth of the “wall of separation”: How metaphor shapes law. Stanford Law Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Posner, R. A. (2009). Law and literature (3rd ed.). . Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Redish, M. H. (2011). The marketplace of ideas and the public forum: First Amendment implications of government ownership of property. University of Chicago Law Review, 929–976. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Resnik, J. (2019). Representing justice: From Renaissance iconography to twenty-first-century courthouses. Yale Law Journal, 67–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Schauer, F. (2009). Thinking like a lawyer: A new introduction to legal reasoning. . Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Steen, G. J. (2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Tiersma, P. M. (1999). This recommendation draws on the field of applied legal linguistics. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Weber. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. White, J. B. (1985). Heracles' bow: Essays on the rhetoric and poetics of the law. . University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. White, J. B. (1985). Heracles' bow: Essays on the rhetoric and poetics of the law. . University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. White, J. B. (1985). Heracles' bow: Essays on the rhetoric and poetics of the law. . University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. White, J. B. (1985). Heracles' bow: Essays on the rhetoric and poetics of the law. . University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. White, J. B. (1985). Heracles' bow: Essays on the rhetoric and poetics of the law. . University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Winter, S. L. (2001). A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Winter, S. L. (2001). A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Winter, S. L. (2001). A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Winter, S. L. (2001). A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. . University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Winter, S. L. (2001). A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. . University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Winter, S. L. (2007). A clearing in the forest: Law, life, and mind. . University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]