The Effect of Corn Stover and Pineapple Waste Ratio in Silage on pH, Microbial Population, and Methane Gas in Rumen (In Vitro)

Authors

Susi Novi Amalia

Student at the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran (Indonesia)

Ujang Hidayat Tanuwiria

Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang (Indonesia)

Iin Susilawati

Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12120141

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 12/12 | Page No: 1692-1700

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-29

Accepted: 2026-01-06

Published: 2026-01-17

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different ratios of corn stover and pineapple waste silage on rumen pH, bacterial population, protozoa population, and methane production under in vitro conditions. The experiment was conducted using a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with four treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of T1 (90% corn stover + 10% pineapple waste), T2 (80% corn stover + 20% pineapple waste), T3 (70% corn stover + 30% pineapple waste), and T4 (60% corn stover + 40% pineapple waste). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. The results showed that varying the ratio of corn stover and pineapple waste silage had no significant effect on rumen pH (6.77–6.78), bacterial population (3.03–3.31 × 10⁹ CFU/mL), or methane production (5.57–6.45 mM) (P > 0.05). In contrast, the protozoa population was significantly affected by the treatments (4.21–4.70 × 10⁵ cells/mL; P ≤ 0.05), showing a decreasing tend by adding levels of pineapple waste. All measured parameters remained within normal physiological ranges, indicating stable rumen fermentation conditions. Although differences in methane production and bacterial population among treatments were not statistically significant, treatment T4 tended to exhibit a higher bacterial population and lower methane production. These findings indicate that combinations of corn stover and pineapple waste silage up to a 60:40 ratio are feasible for maintaining balanced rumen fermentation, with potential implications for improving fermentation efficiency and mitigating methane production. Further in vivo studies are required to confirm these results under practical feeding conditions.

Keywords

Corn Stover Silage, Pineapple Waste, Microbial Population, Rumen pH, Methane Gas

Downloads

References

1. Andri. (2020). Kang Jimat Bahas Kerjasama antara Subang dengan Okinawa dalam Program Sister City. Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Subang. https://subang.go.id/berita/kang-jimat-bahas-kerjasama-antara-subang-dengan-okinawa-dalam-program-sister-city [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Angulo-Padilla, J., Lozano-De La Ossa, L., González-Delgado, Á., Sánchez-Tuirán, E., & Ojeda-Delgado, K. (2018). Potential for Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass via Alkaline Pretreatment using Corn Crop Residual Biomass. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 11(14), 679–687. https://doi.org/10.12988/ces.2018.8263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Produksi Daging Sapi Menurut Provinsi (Ton). BPS Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/24/480/1/produksi-daging-sapi-menurut-provinsi.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bayne, J. E., & Edmondson, M. A. (2020). Diseases of the Gastrointestinal System. In Sheep, Goat, and Cervid Medicine, Elsevier, 63–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-62463-3.00014-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chrysostomus, H., Koni, T., & Foenay, T. (2020). Pengaruh Berbagai Aditif terhadap Kandungan Serat Kasar dan Mineral Silase Kulit Pisang Kepok. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis, 10(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.46549/jipvet.v10i2.100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cornelia, M., & Kristyanti, T. (2021). Utilization of Pineapple’s (Ananas comosus L. Merr.) Peel Waste as Raw Material in Cider Making. Proceedings of the International Conference on Food Science and Technology, 258–263. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010041402580263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gao, J., Wang, P., Zhou, C., Li, P., Tang, H., Zhang, J., & Chai, Y. (2019). Chemical Composition and In Vitro Digestibility of Corn Stover during Field Exposure and Fermentation Characteristics of Silage Prepared with Microbial Additives. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 32(12), 1854–1863. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0886 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hernaman, I., Budiman, A., Nurachman, S., & Hidrajat, K. (2015). Kajian In Vitro Subtitusi Konsentrat dengan Penggunaan Limbah Perkebunan Singkong yang Disuplementasi Kobalt dan Seng dalam Ransum Domba. Buletin Peternakan, 39(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v39i2.6710 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hoy, C., Hartati, E., & Lestari, G. (2023). Pengaruh Silase Pakan Komplit Berbasis Sorgum Clitoria ternatea dengan Penambahan Berbagai Level Konsentrat Mengandung ZnSO₄ dan ZnCu Isoleusinat terhadap Fermentasi Rumen In Vitro. Animal Agricultura, 1(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.59891/animacultura.v1i2.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Khajali, F., & Rafiei, F. (2024). A Review of Plant Anti-Nutritional Factors in Animal Health and Production: Classification, Biological Properties, and Passivation Strategies. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 18, 101290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Liu, J., Wang, Y., Liu, L., Ma, G., Zhang, Y., & Ren, J. (2023). Effect of Moringa Leaf Flavonoids on Production Performance, Immune Response, and Rumen Fermentation of Dairy Cows. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 9(2), 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Martin, C., Morgavi, D. P., & Doreau, M. (2010). Methane Mitigation in Ruminants: From Microbe to the Farm Scale. Animal, 4(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109990620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McDougall, E. I. (1947). Studies on Ruminant Saliva: I. The Composition and Output of Sheep’s Saliva. Biochemical Journal, 43(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0430099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Morgan, C. A., Sinclair, L. A., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2010). Animal Nutrition (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mustika, L. M., & Hartutik, H. (2021). Kualitas Silase Tebon Jagung (Zea mays L.) dengan Penambahan Berbagai Bahan Aditif Ditinjau dari Kandungan Nutrisi. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis, 4(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jnt.2021.004.01.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Paloa, M., Waani, M., & Malalatang, S. (2025). Pengaruh Lama Ensilase dengan Penambahan Tepung Jagung terhadap Kualitas Fisik Rumput Gajah Dwarf (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott). Zootec, 45(2), 197–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Patel, S. (2018). Role of Rumen Protozoa: Metabolic and Fibrolytic Functions. Advances in Biotechnology & Microbiology, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.19080/AIBM.2018.10.555793 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J. (2009). Effect and Mode of Action of Saponins on Microbial Populations and Fermentation in the Rumen. Nutrition Research Reviews, 22(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422409990163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Reiza, I., Rijai, L., & Mahmudah, F. (2019). Skrining Fitokimia Ekstrak Etanol Kulit Nanas (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.). Proceedings of Mulawarman Pharmaceuticals Conferences, 10, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.25026/mpc.v10i1.371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ridla, M., Jayanegara, A., & Nahrowi, N. (2025). Evaluation of Silage Quality, Rumen Fermentation, Degradability, and Methane Emission of Total Mixed Rations from Agricultural By-Products: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 34(3), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/200863/2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Satiyarti, R., Yustisiana, S., & Sugiharta, I. (2023). Analisis Kualitas Silase Tanaman Jagung sebagai Pakan Ternak dengan Durasi Fermentasi Berbeda. Organisms: Journal of Biosciences, 3(2), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.24042/organisms.v3i2.18043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Septia, D., Muhtarudin, M., Tantalo, S., & Liman, L. (2025). Pengaruh Penambahan Kulit Nanas dengan Level Berbeda terhadap Kandungan Bahan Kering, Bahan Organik, dan Uji Organoleptik Silase Tebon Jagung. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Peternakan (Journal of Research and Innovation of Animals), 9(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrip.2025.9.3.464-477 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Soetanto, H. (2019). Pengantar Ilmu Nutrisi Ruminansia. UB Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Suksathit, S., Wachirapakorn, C., & Opatpatanakit, Y. (2011). Effects of Ensiled Pineapple Waste and Pangola Hay as Roughage Sources on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility, and Ruminal Fermentation of Southern Thai Native Cattle. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 33(3), 281–289. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tanuwiria, U., Zain, M., Syamsu, J., Yunilas, Y., Mushawwir, A., & Yanza, Y. (2025). Influence of Rumen Degradable Protein and Non-Fiber Carbohydrate Proportions on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation and Methane Emission. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 12(3), 784–794. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2025.l941 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Theodorou, M. K., Williams, B. A., Dhanoa, M. S., McAllan, A. B., & France, J. (1994). A Simple Gas Production Method using a Pressure Transducer to Determine Fermentation Kinetics of Ruminant Feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 48(3–4), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Tuturoong, R. A. V., Malalantang, S. S., & Moningkey, S. A. E. (2020). Assessment of Nutritive Value of Corn Stover and King Grass in Complete Feed on Ongole Steer Calves Productivity. Veterinary World, 13(4), 801–806. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.801-806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Usman, Y. (2013). Pemberian Pakan Serat Sisa Tanaman Pertanian terhadap Evolusi pH, N-NH₃, dan VFA Rumen Sapi. Jurnal Agripet, 13(2), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v13i2.821 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wahyuni, S., Kadarusno, A., & Suwerda, B. (2016). Pemanfaatan Saccharomyces cerevisiae dan Limbah Buah Nanas untuk Pembuatan Bioetanol. Sanitasi: Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 7(4), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.29238/sanitasi.v7i4.725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wajizah, S., Usman, Y., & Mariana, D. E. (2015). Evaluation of Nutritive Value and In Vitro Digestibility of Oil Palm Fronds Fermented using Aspergillus niger. Agripet, 15(1), 13–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wandra, F., Pranowo, A., Hernaman, I., Tanuwiria, U., & Ayuningsih, B. (2020). Fermentabilitas Ransum yang Mengandung Ampas Bir dalam Cairan Rumen (In Vitro). Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 15(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.15.2.227-235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wati, W., Mashudi, M., & Irsyammawati, A. (2018). Kualitas Silase Rumput Odot (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott) dengan Penambahan Lactobacillus plantarum dan Molases. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis, 1(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jnt.2018.001.01.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Widiawati, Y. (2009). Pengaruh Substitusi Produk Samping Nenas (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) terhadap Ekosistem Rumen Domba. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner, 14(4), 243–261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wurlina, W., Hariadi, M., Mustofa, I., & Meles, D. (2020). Penggemukan Sapi Menggunakan Complete Feed dan Tape Jerami. Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat, 2(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.20473/jlm.v2i2.2018.63-68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Yanuartono, Y., Nururrozi, A., Indarjulianto, S., & Purnamaningsih, H. (2019). Peran Protozoa pada Pencernaan Ruminansia dan Dampaknya terhadap Lingkungan. Ternak Tropika: Journal of Tropical Animal Production, 20(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtapro.2019.020.01.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yuliyati, Y., Rachman, S., & Noviyanti, A. (2018). Pembuatan Silase Rumput Gajah untuk Pakan Ternak. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 2(7), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zhang, M., Wang, R., Wu, T., Yang, Y., He, Z., Ma, Z., Tan, Z., Lin, B., & Wang, M. (2022). Comparison of Corn Stover Silages Harvested at Different Maturity Stages on Digestibility and Rumen Fermentation. Animals, 12(10), 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles