Rethinking Intellectual Property Protection for India’s Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Heritage: Legal Framework and Challenges
Authors
Department of Law, Prestige Institute of Management and Research (India)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-07
Accepted: 2026-01-12
Published: 2026-01-24
Abstract
Embodying the wisdom, customs, and artistic expressions of many communities, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions are essential parts of India's rich cultural legacy. But because there aren't enough strong legal safeguards in place, these priceless assets are frequently at risk of being taken advantage of, abused, and eroded.
This study gives a general introduction to traditional knowledge (TCE) and gives an analysis of the legal framework in India for their preservation. It also looks at the efficiency of current IPR procedures and explores the effects of globalization and digital technologies on TCEs and TK. This research paper explores the complex interrelationships that exist in India between traditional knowledge, traditional cultural expressions, and intellectual property rights. With an emphasis on the function of intellectual property rights in defending and conserving indigenous heritage, this research study examines possible opportunities and problems related to the protection of traditional knowledge (TK) and traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) in India.
This study intends to suggest a strong and culturally sensitive approach to protecting India's traditional knowledge and traditional cultural manifestations through intellectual property rights (IPR) by looking at the current legal frameworks, difficulties, and worldwide developments. The research paper emphasizes how crucial it is to strike a balance between innovation and cultural heritage preservation, highlighting the necessity of stakeholder collaboration in order to ensure sustainable protection.
Keywords
Traditional knowledge, Traditional cultural expressions, Intellectual property rights
Downloads
References
1. http://www.lmmc.nic.in/index.php. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Apte, T. (2006), A Simple Guide to Intellectual Property Rights, Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge, Kalpa vriksh, GRAIN, and IIIT, Pune/Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Balasubramanian, K,(1997), Herbal Remedies: Consumer Protection Concerns, consumers International, Penang. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bera, R.K.(2008), Nive perceptions about patents in India, Current Science, 94:1565-1566. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Correa, C. (2000), integrating public health concerns into patent legislation in developing countries, South Centre, Geneva. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Downes, D. (1997), Using Intellectual Property as a Tool to Protect Traditional Knowledge, Madrid: Centre for international Environmental Law (CIEL). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. The WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, (1994), WTO, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, (GATT Secretariat, Geneva), 1995. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. GRAIN, The great protection racket: Imposing IPRs on traditional knowledge, http://www.grain.org/seedling/seed- 04-01-3-en.cfm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Mashelkar R A, (2001) Intellectual property rights and the third world, Special Section: Science in the third world, Current Science, 81(25) 955-965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Sahai Suman, (2000) Commercialization of Indigenous Knowledge and Benefit Sharing, UNCTAD, Report of the Expert Meeting on Systems and National Experiences for Protecting Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices from 30 October to 1 November www.biotrade.org. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Vandana Shiva,(2003)US Monopolists Continue Bio Piracy Against India, http://www.progress.org/patent03.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. WHO, Traditional Medicinal Strategy: 2002-2005, WHO/EDM/TRM/2002 (WHO, Geneva), 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
- Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
- The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
- An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
- The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.