The Role of Scaffolding Learning in Developing Mathematical Skills Among Low-Achieving Students at a Selected School in Zimbabwe

Authors

Sesilani Nkomo

Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo (Zimbabwe)

Fungai Gonhi

Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo (Zimbabwe)

Kuda Moyo

Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo (Zimbabwe)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010095

Subject Category: Health

Volume/Issue: 13/1 | Page No: 1096-1107

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-04

Accepted: 2026-01-09

Published: 2026-02-03

Abstract

This study examined the impact of scaffolding on the development of Mathematical skills among low-achieving Ordinary Level learners. Progress record books, mark schedule from the school where the study was carried out were consulted and proved that most learners performed below average in Mathematics. A qualitative study which employed an exploratory case study design was done, involving thirty learners from the selected school who were selected purposively using mark schedules to determine ability. The whole sample group received scaffolding support. Pre-and post-tests were administered to assess mathematical proficiency. Learners were grouped into six groups of five members to carry out focus groups on the method used in teaching. The findings suggest that scaffolding can be an effective strategy for enhancing mathematical proficiency among low-achieving learners. The results also indicated that learners in the study group demonstrated significant improvements in Mathematical skills, particularly in problem-solving and conceptual understanding. Analysis pointed out that basically scaffolding teaching and learning method encourages independence, helps learners gain and develop 21st century competencies such as critical thinking, creativity, collaboration and problem-solving skills. Scaffolding activities were found to allow learners to develop deep content knowledge, assist learners to be directly involved in making decisions about the topic and the investigations involved. Profound information suggested that scaffolding increases motivation to learn, engagement and participation of learners in Mathematics learning at Ordinary Level. Recommendations were made to parents, teachers and other stakeholders. It was suggested as a recommendation that parental involvement can also contribute to learner success and motivation. The study’s implications for teaching practices and future research were discussed

Keywords

Scaffolding; Mathematical Skill; Low-achieving Student; Developing

Downloads

References

1. Arbarelo, M. (2014). Goeometry of Algebraic Curves. Berlin: Berlin Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asterhan, C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on the concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 626-639. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barut, W. (2020). Geometry Learning in Vocational High School: Investigating the students' difficulties and levels of thinking . Journal of Physics: Conference series 2020 (pp. 256-266). Peneliti: Mahasiswa publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Battista, M. T. (2017). The Development of Geometric and Spartial Thinking .Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning . Mathematics Journal VOL.2, 843-908. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Belland, B.R; Walker, A.E; Kim, N.J; Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesising Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-analysis. Review of Education Research, 309-344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bulu, S.T; Pedasern , S. (2016). Scaffolding Middle-School Students Content Knowledge and Iii-structured Problem Solving in a Problem-based Hypermedia Learning Environment. Education Technology Research and Development, 507-529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carl, B. A. (2016). The Dilemma in Geometry. The Mathematics Journal for Life, 165-169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chang, H.Y; Linn, M.C. (2013). Scaffolding Learning from Molecular Visualisisations . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 494-858. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Charlotte, Skipp , Dommett, Eleanor . (2021). Understanding and addressing the deficiencies in ukmathematics education. Taking an International Persperctive, 141-159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Diaz, A; Nussbaum, M; Nopo, H; Corredar, J. (2015). Providing Teachers with Scaffolding to Address Curriculum Standards and Students' Pace of Learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, Google Scholar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gerard, L; Matuk, C; MC Elhaney, K; Lynn, M.C. (2015). Automated Adaptive Guidance for K-12 Education. Education Research Review, 41-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Juran, J. M. (2020). Juran's quality handbook. NEW YORK: MACGROW-HILL. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Matunga, O. (2024). Exploring E-Learning in Zimbabwe Physics Education. Bindura: Bindura University Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Palinscar, A.S; Flitzgerald, M.S; Marcum, M.B; Sherwood, C.A. (2018). Examining the Work of Scaffolding in Theory and Practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 191-208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pear, R. (2016). Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning Education and Human Activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 423-451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Puntambekar, S; Hubscher, R. (2017). Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment . Educational Psychologist, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Quintana, C; Reiser, B.J; Davis , E.A. (2018). A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences , 337-386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Raes, A; Schellens, T; De Wever, B; Vanderhoven, E. (2019). Scaffolding Information Problem-solving in Web-Based Collaborative Inquiry Learning . Computer and Education, 82-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Reiser, B. (2014). Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanism of bStructuring and Problematising Students' work . Journal of the Learning Sciences, 273-304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Reiser, B.J; Michaels, S; Moon, J. (2017). Scaling up three-dimension Science Learning Through Teacher-Led Study Groups Across a State. Journal of Teacher Education, 280-298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Shevin, B.L; Reiser, B.J; Edelson, D.C. (2016). Scaffolding Analysis; Extending The Scalffolding Metaphor To Learning Artfects. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 387-421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Suyutino, H., Eka, N. U., & Budhiati, V. (2019). The development of geometry concepts understanding based on NCTM reference in learning using discovery learning model. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education , 42-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Swayer, R. (2019). The Creative Classrom ;Inovative Teaching 21st-Century Leaners . New York: Tearchers' College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tabak, I; Kyza, E.A. (2018). Research on Scaffolding in the Learning Sciences: A Methodological Perspective . New York: Routledge,Google Scholar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Taber, K. S. (2018). Effective Teaching and Learning Pesrspective, Strategies and Implementations. Nova Science , 1-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Taber, K. S. (2020). Mediated Learning Leading Development-The Social Development Theory of Levy Vygotsky. New York : American Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Taber, Keith S; Brock , Richard. (2019). A Study to Explore the Poetential of designing Teaching Activities to Scaffolding Learning:Understanding Circular Motion. New York: American Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Thomann, H. & Deutscher V, (2025). Scaffolding through prompts in digital learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness on learning achievement. educational Research Review 47(2025)100686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Van de-pol, J; Volman, J; Mecer, N. (2018). Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educationa Psychology Review, 271-296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Van de-pol, J; Volman, M; Beishuizen, J. (2017). Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small Group Work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 206-239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Vogel, F; Weckes, C; Kollar, I; Fischer, B. (2017). Socio-Cognitive Scaffolding with Computer Supported Collaborationn Scripts: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 477-511. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Walker, A. E. (2022). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 53-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wong, L., Boticki, I., Sun, J., & Looi, C. (2020). Improving Scaffolding of a Mobile-Assisted Chinese Character Forming Game via a Design-based Research Cycle. Computer in Human Behavior Google Scholar, 1783-1793. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Park, M., Elinich, K., & Lin, J. (2018). How Augmented Reality, Textual and Collaborative TO Improve Learnimg in a Science Meusium. Reasearch in Science and Technology Education, 261-281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles