Assessment of Barriers to Reproductive Healthcare Accessibility among Women Living with Physical Disabilities in Tana River County, Kenya

The reproductive rights of women living with disabilities remain a significant but neglected facet of global health equity, particularly within low-resource environments. This paper evaluates the barriers to the accessibility and utilization of reproductive health services among women living with physical disabilities in Tana River County, Kenya. Utilizing a qualitative research design underpinned by the social model of disability, the investigation involved in-depth interviews with twenty women living with physical disabilities, alongside purposively selected healthcare providers and Ministry of Health administrators. Data were analyzed thematically, revealing five primary clusters of barriers: Physical and infrastructural deficits, communication and information gaps, attitudinal and social stigma, financial and policy enforcement failures, and significant concerns regarding privacy and autonomy. Quantitative indicators embedded within the analysis demonstrate that while essential services like antenatal care and family planning are reportedly available, meaningful accessibility is severely hampered by a lack of disability-friendly infrastructure and a deficiency in specialized provider training. The findings suggest that structural and systemic failures, rather than individual physical impairments, are the primary drivers of reproductive health disparities in this region. The study concludes with targeted recommendations for the implementation of universal design principles, institutionalized communication support, and the stringent enforcement of local disability-inclusive legislation to ensure reproductive equity for all women in Tana River County.

Reproductive Health, Physical Disabilities, Healthcare Accessibility, Social Model, Tana River County

1. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2004). Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Berghs, M., Atkin, K., Graham, H., Hatton, C., & Thomas, C. (2016). Implications for public health research of models and theories of disability: A scoping study and evidence synthesis. Public Health Research, 4(8), 1-166. https://doi.org/10.3310/phr04080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bolarinwa, O., & Mohammed, A. (2025). Bridging gaps in maternity care for women with disabilities: A scoping review of access and utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa adopting the WHO health systems framework. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00395-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chipanta, D., Mitra, S., Amo-Agyei, S., Velarde, M. R., Amekudzi, K., Osborne, C., Estill, J., & Keiser, O. (2023). Differences between persons with and without disability in HIV prevalence, testing, treatment, and care Cascade in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study using population-based data. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2397135/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chou, Y., Uwano, T., Chen, B., Sarai, K., Nguyen, L. D., Chou, C., Mongkolsawadi, S., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Assessing disability rights in four Asian countries: The perspectives of disabled people on physical, attitudinal and cultural barriers. Political Geography, 108, 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.103027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elder, B. C. (2015). Right to inclusive education for students with disabilities in Kenya. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 18(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.9782/2159-4341-18.1.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Emerson, E. (2021). Inequalities and inequities in the health of people with intellectual disabilities. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ganle, J. K., Baatiema, L., Quansah, R., & Danso-Appiah, A. (2020). Barriers facing persons with disability in accessing sexual and reproductive health services in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. PloS one, 15(10), e0238585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Geller, R. J., Decker, M. R., Adedimeji, A. A., Weber, K. M., Kassaye, S., Taylor, T. N., Cohen, J., Adimora, A. A., Haddad, L. B., Fischl, M., Cunningham, S., & Golub, E. T. (2020). A prospective study of exposure to gender-based violence and risk of sexually transmitted infection acquisition in the women's Interagency HIV study, 1995–2018. Journal of Women's Health, 29(10), 1256-1267. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.7972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hameed, S., Maddams, A., Lowe, H., Davies, L., Khosla, R., & Shakespeare, T. (2020). From words to actions: Systematic review of interventions to promote sexual and reproductive health of Persons with Disabilities in low- and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health, 5(10), e002903. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kar, S., Bashar, A., Gnanasekaran, S., Jayasree, A. K., Indu, P. S., & Srivastava, K. (2024). Role of Gender Equity and Disability Inclusion to Help Achieve the Larger Cause of Health for All and Attain SDG 2030 by India. Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 49(Suppl 2), S153–S158. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_751_24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kilfoyle, K. A., Vitko, M., O'Conor, R., & Bailey, S. C. (2016). Health literacy and women's reproductive health: A systematic review. Journal of Women's Health, 25(12), 1237-1255. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.5810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lawson, A., & Beckett, A. E. (2021). The social and human rights models of disability: towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(2), 348–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lindsay, S., Phonepraseuth, J., & Leo, S. (2025). Poverty alleviation policies, programs and practices for people with disabilities: A scoping review and recommendations. PLOS One, 20(5), e0323540. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pathak, P. K., Haq, S. M., Tripathi, N., & Degfie, T. (2025). Gender inequalities, sexual and reproductive health, and sustainable development in the Global South. Frontiers Media SA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Roudsari, R. L., Sharifi, F., & Goudarzi, F. (2023). Barriers to the participation of men in reproductive health care: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Public Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15692-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Taouk, L. H., Fialkow, M. F., & Schulkin, J. A. (2018). Provision of Reproductive Healthcare to Women with Disabilities: A Survey of Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Training, Practices, and Perceived Barriers. Health equity, 2(1), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tseng, K. W., Mohabbat, H., Adachi, A., Calaguas, A., Kaur, A., Salem, N., & Goliaei, Z. (2025). Reproductive health literacy and knowledge among female refugees: A scoping review of measurement methodologies and effect on health behavior. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202505.2383.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Umucu, E., Vernon, A. A., Pan, D., Qin, S., Solis, G., Campa, R., & Lee, B. (2025). Health inequities among persons with disabilities: A global scoping review. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1538519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. UNFPA. (2020). It is a myth that people living with disabilities do not need to prevent unplanned pregnancies, HIV and STIs – we are not asexual. https://esaro.unfpa.org/en/news/it-myth-people-living-disabilities-do-not-need-prevent-unplanned-pregnancies-hiv-and-stis-%E2%80%93-we [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. United Nations. (2023). Article 25 – Health | United Nations enable. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/article-25-health.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. WHO. (2022). Disability around the world < world ParaVolley. https://worldparavolley.org/foundation/disability-around-world/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar