Evaluating the Impact of E-Government Platforms on Public Service Delivery in Kenya

This study evaluated the impact of e-government platforms on public service delivery in Kenya, with a particular focus on how digital systems influence the efficiency, transparency, accessibility, and responsiveness of public institutions. It examined the extent to which platforms such as eCitizen, IFMIS, iTax, and Huduma services enhance the capacity of government agencies to deliver services effectively to citizens. The research explored existing e-government mechanisms, institutional and technical challenges, and perceived service delivery outcomes, offering insights into the broader implications of digital governance for accountability, public trust, and social equity. The study adopted a descriptive research design and targeted institutional actors directly involved in the implementation and use of e-government platforms, including officials from national ministries, county governments, ICT departments, and service delivery agencies. The target population comprised 600 stakeholders, from which a sample size of 234 respondents was determined using Krejcie and Morgan’s formula, alongside 30 purposively selected key informants. A mixed-methods approach was employed, utilizing structured questionnaires to collect quantitative data and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) to gather qualitative insights. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques, while qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis and presented narratively to complement the quantitative findings. The findings revealed that e-government platforms have significantly improved public service delivery in Kenya by reducing bureaucratic delays, minimizing opportunities for rent-seeking, enhancing service accessibility, and increasing transparency in government operations. However, the effectiveness of these platforms is constrained by challenges such as inadequate ICT infrastructure, digital exclusion of marginalized populations, limited technical capacity among public servants, resistance to organizational change, and intermittent system failures. Public perceptions indicated that while e-government has enhanced efficiency and convenience, persistent gaps in inclusivity and system reliability undermine its full potential. The study recommends increased investment in ICT infrastructure, particularly in rural and underserved areas, to bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable access to e-government services. Capacity-building programs should be strengthened to enhance digital literacy among public servants and citizens. The government should also improve system integration across agencies to reduce duplication and enhance service interoperability. Additionally, robust data protection frameworks and cybersecurity measures must be reinforced to safeguard user information and build public confidence. Finally, a continuous monitoring and evaluation framework should be institutionalized to assess the performance and impact of e-government platforms, enabling evidence-based improvements in public service delivery.

Digital anti-corruption mechanisms; ICT capacity building; Digital governance; E-government institutional frameworks; Interoperability and inter-agency integration.

1. Anguche, P., Waweru, K., & Ouma, S. (2025). Digital governance and public service performance in Kenya. Nairobi: African Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andersen, K., Pedersen, T., & Sorensen, E. (2019). E-government adoption and public service efficiency in Denmark. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 101–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2020). ICT, public sector reform and e-government: Lessons from international experience. Information Polity, 25(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bhatnagar, S. (2021). Digital government in developing countries: Constraints and challenges. New Delhi: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Government of Kenya. (2022). Digital Economy Blueprint: Transforming Kenya into a digital society and economy. Nairobi: Ministry of ICT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Heeks, R. (2018). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kinyua, J. (2022). The impact of iTax on revenue collection in Kenya. Kenya Journal of Public Finance, 4(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kituyi, G., & Waweru, F. (2025). User adoption and institutional determinants of e-government in Kenya. African Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 110–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mensah, J., Agyei, K., & Boateng, R. (2021). E-government adoption and service delivery in Ghana. Journal of African Public Administration, 12(2), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2021). Digital government adoption in the United States: Integration, coordination, and outcomes. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mutula, S., & Wamukoya, J. (2019). E-government in Kenya: Status, challenges, and impact. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ndou, V. (2020). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 87(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Njiru, P., Mwangi, T., & Ombui, K. (2024). Institutional coordination and the effectiveness of e-government platforms in Kenya. African Journal of Public Sector Innovation, 6(1), 34–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Otieno, M. (2021). Evaluating the impact of IFMIS on service delivery in Kenya. Kenya Journal of Public Administration, 13(2), 77–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – Into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Riany, T. (2021). E-government and citizen-centered service delivery: Evidence from East Africa. East African Journal of Governance, 3(1), 25–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Twinomurinzi, H., Botha, A., & Eloff, M. (2019). Digital government in South Africa: Adoption, challenges, and outcomes. South African Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.1023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. United Nations. (2020). E-Government survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. United Nations. (2022). E-Government survey 2022: The future of digital government. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wanyama, F., & Ngugi, P. (2023). Citizen perspectives on e-government services in Kenya. Kenya Journal of Public Policy, 15(1), 88–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. World Bank. (2021). Digital government in Africa: Kenya country report. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark