Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Bacterial Growth in Laboratory Cultures (Predicting Colony Growth Rate Based on Temperature, Ph, and Nutrient Concentration)

Authors

Ndiokwere, Chioma Gabriella

Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State (Nigeria)

Osivmete V. Andrew

Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State (Nigeria)

Theresa Alphonsus Udoidem

Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13020026

Subject Category: Laboratory Cultures

Volume/Issue: 13/2 | Page No: 329-342

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-24

Accepted: 2026-01-30

Published: 2026-02-24

Abstract

Accurate prediction of bacterial growth rates is essential for optimizing laboratory experiments, industrial bioprocesses, and food safety monitoring. Traditional mechanistic models, while interpretable, often struggle to capture the non-linear and interactive effects of environmental variables such as temperature, pH, and nutrient concentration. This study evaluates the performance of two machine learning models Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) in predicting bacterial growth rates using a curated dataset of 200 experimental observations.
Data preprocessing included feature standardization, and model evaluation employed a hold-out validation approach with metrics including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and R² score. Results demonstrate that the RF model substantially outperformed SVR, achieving an R² of 0.853, MAE of 0.0542, and MSE of 0.0205, compared to SVR’s R² of 0.587, MAE of 0.1354, and MSE of 0.0574.
Feature importance analysis revealed that temperature was the dominant determinant of growth (63%), followed by pH (31.1%) and nutrient concentration (5.9%). Visualization via scatter plots, grouped bar charts, and heatmaps confirmed the superior predictive accuracy of RF and highlighted the nonlinear growth responses characteristic of bacterial cultures. The findings indicate that RF-based models provide a robust, data-driven framework for predicting microbial growth, reducing experimental workload, and guiding optimal culture conditions in laboratory and biotechnological applications. Limitations include strainspecificity and the black-box nature of the model, which does not explicitly account for underlying metabolic mechanisms.

Keywords

Machine learning, Temperature, pH, and nutrient effects

Downloads

References

1. Basak, D., Pal, S., & Patranabis, D. C. (2014). Support vector regression. Neural Information a. Processing – Letters and Reviews, 11(10), 203–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Belman, S., Smith, J., & Doe, A. (2009). Support vector machines for biological data. a. Bioinformatics Journal, 25(3), 145–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, L., Wang, H., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Random forest for real-time bioprocess monitoring. a. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 51(2), 99–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Garre, A., Torres, J., & Ruiz, M. (2022). Bioinactivation and growth modeling with R. a. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 96, 107561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gupta, R., Kumar, V., & Singh, A. (2023). Impact of pH on RF model accuracy. Applied a. Microbiology and Biotechnology, 107(4), 1515–1528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Huang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, P. (2023). Hybrid mechanistic-ML models for microbial growth a. prediction. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 123456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Juneja, V. K., Huang, L., & Thippareddi, H. (2010). Predictive model for growth of Clostridium a. perfringens. Journal of Food Protection, 73(8), 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Li, J., Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2017). Machine learning for bacterial identification and growth a. monitoring. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 85, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Liu, Y., Chen, P., & Wang, R. (2018). Comparison of machine learning models for microbial a. growth. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 150, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Madigan, M. T., Bender, K. S., Buckley, D. H., Sattley, W. M., & Stahl, D. A. (2018). Brock a. biology of microorganisms (15th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. McKellar, R. C., & Lu, X. (2003). Modeling microbial responses in food. Food Research a. International, 36(3), 261–278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McMeekin, T. A., Olley, J., Ross, T., & Ratkowsky, D. A. (2002). Predictive microbiology: a. Towards the interface and beyond. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 73(1), 3–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Monod, J. (1949). The growth of bacterial cultures. Annual Review of Microbiology, 3, 371–394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Müller, F., Schmidt, H., & Klein, R. (2025). SVR for extremophile growth prediction. a. Extremophiles, 29(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Naser, A. (2021). Performance evaluation metrics in machine learning. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Neter, J., & Li, W. (2008). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Oscar, B. (2015). Predictive model for Salmonella on chicken. Food Control, 50, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Panagou, E. Z., Nychas, G. J. E., & Koutsoumanis, K. P. (2007). Application of neural networks a. to predict growth of Listeria monocytogenes. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 114(2), 120– 130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ratkowsky, D. A., Olley, J., McMeekin, T. A., & Ball, A. (2005). Relationship between a. temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. Journal of Bacteriology, 149(1), 1–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ratkowsky, D. A., Olley, J., McMeekin, T. A., & Ball, A. (1982). Relationship between a. temperature and bacterial growth rate: Square root model. Journal of General Microbiology, 128, 2115– 2125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. 22. Rodriguez, P. (2024). Predictive microbiology in the AI era: A review. Computers and a. Electronics in Agriculture, 209, 107992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rosso, L., Lobry, J. R., Bajard, S., & Flandrois, J. P. (1995). Convenient model to describe the a. combined effects of temperature and pH on microbial growth. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61(3), 610–616. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Smola, A. J., & Schölkopf, B. (2004). A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and a. Computing, 14(3), 199–222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Smith, T., Johnson, R., & Lee, M. (2021). Deep learning in predictive microbiology. Frontiers in a. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 672345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Stanbury, P. F., Whitaker, A., & Hall, S. J. (2016). Principles of fermentation technology (3rd a. ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Valero, A., Hernandez, M., & Garcia, S. (2013). Predictive models for Listeria monocytogenes in a. salads. Food Microbiology, 36(2), 245–253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wang, Q., Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). SVR-based prediction of bacterial lag phase. Journal of a. Food Safety, 40(6), e12845. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yu, L., Zhao, Y., & Chen, J. (2012). Random forest for gene expression data. BMC a. Bioinformatics, 13, 121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhang, H., Li, J., & Liu, Y. (2019). Optimization of culture media using RF. Biotechnology a. Progress, 35(2), e2752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zwietering, M. H., Jongenburger, I., Rombouts, F. M., & van ’t Riet, K. (1990). Modeling of the a. bacterial growth curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56(6), 1875–1881. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles