Beyond Aesthetic Green Spaces: A Qualitative Study of the Social and Educational Values of Sustainable University Landscapes at the University of Sri Jayewardenepura

Sustainable landscapes in higher education settings offer multifaceted benefits beyond aesthetics, supporting psychological well-being, social cohesion, and experiential learning. This study assesses and analyzes the perception and the experiential social and educational value of these landscapes by the students, staff, and visitors of the University of Sri Jayewardenepura. Data were gathered through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews and analyzed via thematic analysis. The findings of this research highlight the fact that the sustainable landscapes of the University of Sri Jayewardenepura promote stress reduction, enhance emotional wellbeing, and aid cognitive recovery, thereby functioning as psychologically restorative environments (SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being). The university community became cohesive and informal social interaction was strengthened (SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities). The campus community engaged in experiential learning, observation of the campus and curricula integrated landscape of the campuses ecosystems (SDG 15: Life on Land). Restricted aesthetic and ecological design was appreciated for its interpretive design, outdoor classrooms, social interaction pathways, and socially responsible environmental stewardship and learning (SDG 15: Life on Land). The expressive landscaping design of the university altered community perceptions through visual advocacy and enhanced articulated digital community advocacy (SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure).

Sustainable Landscapes, Higher Education, Psychological Restoration (SDG 3)

1. Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behaviour through free-choice learning experiences: What is the state of the game? Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500081145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Hughes, K. (2008). Environmental awareness, interests and motives of botanic gardens visitors: Implications for interpretive practice. Tourism Management, 29(3), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barton, J., Pretty, J., Wood, C., & Rogerson, M. (2009). Green exercise: Linking nature, health and wellbeing. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beck, L., Heimlich, J. E., & Quigley, C. (2002). Environmental interpretation: A 21st-century perspective. Journal of Interpretation Research, 7(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clayton, S. (2007). Domesticated nature: Motivations for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Del Tredici, P. (2007). Suburban wildscapes and the art of ecological landscaping. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(7), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[377:SWATAO]2.0.CO;2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J., & Benton, T. G. (2010). Scaling up from gardens: Biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ham, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Fulcrum Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Head, L., & Muir, P. (2006). Suburban life and the boundaries of nature: Resilience and rupture in Australian backyard gardens. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(4), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00228.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Interview C. (2010). University of Delaware campus sustainability and landscape management practices. Unpublished institutional interview. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kaplan, S. (2007). Promoting mental health through nature: Contact with nature and human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Marynowski, S. B., & Jacobson, S. K. (1999). What motivates visitors to tropical gardens? Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462990050105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nassauer, J. I. (1995). Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal, 14(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.14.2.161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Özgüner, H., & Kendle, A. D. (2006). Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.10.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sustainable Sites Initiative. (2009). Guidelines and performance benchmarks. American Society of Landscape Architects. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tyrväinen, L., Silvennoinen, H., & Kolehmainen, O. (2003). Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1(3), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1078/16188667-00014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tyrväinen, L., et al. (2024). Health and well-being effects of green spaces in higher education environments: A scoping review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 242, 104900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations General Assembly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yang, Y., Zhou, D., & Chen, W. (2024). Perceived campus green space, place attachment, and social well-being among university students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, 102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yang, Y., Chen, W., & Fan, P. (2024). Emotional responses to campus green spaces based on social media data. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 92, 128114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zheng, Y., Tian, Y., Liu, Y., Jia, P., & Cao, X. (2024). Associations between campus landscape characteristics and students’ mental well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 239, 104825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar