Utilization of Print and Electronic Resources in a Private University

The integration of print and electronic resources in Philippine academic libraries has gained importance as students’ learning preferences evolve. Rodriguez (2020) observed that while learners appreciate the convenience of digital resources, they continue to value print materials for deep reading and note-taking. Similarly, Esposo-Betan and Fresnido (2022) highlighted that academic libraries in the Philippines adopted hybrid service models during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing institutional readiness and resource investment as key factors influencing sustainable digital engagement. This study examined the factors affecting students’ use of print and electronic resources at the STI West Negros University (STIWNU) Library. Employing a descriptive-quantitative research design and survey method, data were collected from 371 students across seven colleges. Results revealed that most respondents were young adults aged 17–20, predominantly male, and enrolled in various academic programs. Internet resources (M = 3.77) and books (M = 3.66) were the most utilized, while CDs and DVDs were least used. The most influential factor in resource use was relevance to academic needs (M = 4.10), with unstable internet connectivity (M = 3.21) and overcrowding (M = 3.16) identified as major challenges. The findings affirm that accessibility, infrastructure, and resource relevance significantly shape library utilization. It is recommended that the STIWNU Library enhance internet connectivity, expand study spaces, strengthen user training and faculty collaboration, and allocate increased funding to update print and electronic collections, upgrade technologies, and improve facilities to better support learning and research needs.

Library, Use, Print, Electronic, Resources, Students, academic libraries.

1. Aharony, N. (2020). Factors affecting library usage among university students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baron, N. S. (2021). How We Read Now: Strategic Choices for Print, Screen, and Audio. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th Ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dr. Manish Kumar. (2023). Research Methodology. Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Esposo-Betan, S. M., & Fresnido, A. M. (2022). COVID-19 and Philippine academic libraries. International Journal of Librarianship, 7(1), Article 215. https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2022.vol7.1.215 journal.calaijol.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fenny, T., & Perdhani, W. C. (2024). Investigating students’ perceptions of digital vs. print reading materials. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 11(1), 142-153. Retrieved from https://e-journal.unimudasorong.ac.id/index.php/interactionjournal/article/view/2262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Howard, K., & Yates, E. (2021). Academic Libraries in the Digital Age: Strategies for Managing Electronic Resources. Library Management, 42(4/5), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-07-2020-0090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Keshavarz, H., Hosseini, F., & Ghaffari, A. (2022). The Role of Electronic Resources in Academic Libraries: A Study on Usage Patterns and User Satisfaction. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kumar, R., & Singh, S. (2020). Library resource utilization: A study of factors influencing student preferences. Journal of Academic Libraries, 46(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.acalib .2020 .10 2181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A. M., Kurbanoglu, S., & Boustany, J. (2018). Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors among University Students Worldwide: A Comparative Survey Analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(5), e0197444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A. M., Kurbanoglu, S., & Boustany, J. (2018). Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors Among University Students Worldwide: A Comparative Survey Analysis. PLoS ONE, 13(5), e0197444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mohan, Meenu. (2021).Use of Print and Electronic Resources among the Post-Graduate Students in the Teaching Departments of University of. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article= 9275&context=libphilprac, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ngugi, M. N., & Njue, E. W. (2021). Challenges affecting access and use of library resources in higher education institutions. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 13(2), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS2021.0972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Prime, Robertson. “Descriptive Research Design Guide | Descriptive Studies.” Best Dissertation Writers, 23 Sept. 2024, bestdissertationwriter.com/descriptive-research-design/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rodriguez, L. R. (2020). Resource Utilization in University Libraries in the Visayas Region: A Comparative Study of Print and Electronic Resources. Philippine Journal of Library & Information Science, 45(1), 15-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Emerging Roles of Library Professionals in the Digital Age
• User's Perceptions of Libraries Physical Infrastructure Facilities in United Arab Emirates and India: A Comparative Study