Rethinking the Anthropocene: Political Economy and the North–South Climate Divide

The concept of the Anthropocene frames climate change as the cumulative outcome of human activity, suggesting a shared and universal responsibility for planetary degradation. However, this universal framing risks obscuring the historically uneven structures of power, production, and consumption that have shaped the climate crisis. This paper critically re-examines the Anthropocene through a political economy lens, arguing that the climate emergency is not simply the result of “humanity” as a whole, but of a historically specific model of industrial capitalism concentrated in the Global North. By interrogating patterns of historical carbon emissions, industrial expansion, resource extraction, and global trade asymmetries, the study demonstrates how environmental degradation has been structurally embedded within unequal North–South economic relations.

By repositioning the climate crisis within global power hierarchies

1. Crist, E. (2016). On the poverty of our nomenclature. In J. W. Moore (Ed.), Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism (pp. 14–33). PM Press. (Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The “Anthropocene.” Global Change Newsletter, 41(1), 17–18. (Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. Verso. (Cambridge University Press & Assessment) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Moore, J. W. (2017). The Capitalocene, part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(3), 594–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036 (Docslib) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. UNFCCC. (n.d.). Introduction to climate finance. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/topics/introduction-to-climate-finance (unfccc.int) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Article 3). (Wikipedia) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (n.d.). Green Climate Fund. Retrieved from mrhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Climate_Fund (Wikipedia) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Williams, M., et al. (2015). The Anthropocene: A formal geological epoch? Journal of the Geological Society, 23(2), 227–228. (Note: Classic reference often cited in Anthropocene scholarship—add full DOI as needed) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Common but differentiated responsibilities: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992). Common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR). (Wikipedia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. North–South carbon responsibility data: Authoritative emissions studies (e.g., Semieniuk & Yakovenko, 2020). (arXiv) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Climate finance critique: OECD (2023) Development Co‑operation Report: Climate finance assessment. (OECD) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ecological debt concept: Warlenius, R., Pierce, G., & Ramasar, V. (n.d.). Ecological debt theory. (Wikipedia) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions