Revisiting Thiruvalluvar’s Thirukkural through the Lens of the Sustainable Development Goals

Authors

Dr Soni T L

Thrissur, Kerala, India (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13020084

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 13/2 | Page No: 940-951

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-12

Accepted: 2026-02-17

Published: 2026-03-03

Abstract

Existing research reveals a notable gap at the intersection of sustainable development studies and classical ethical thinking. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a comprehensive global framework for addressing contemporary social, economic, and environmental challenges. This study addresses this gap by reviewing Thirukkural, a classical Tamil ethical text by Thiruvalluvar, and using the SDGs as an interpretive analytical lens. Using thematic analysis, the study conceptually aligns each SDG with the ethical principles articulated in Thirukkural, including justice, moderation, compassion, ethical governance, and collective responsibility. The analysis deliberately avoids anachronism and recognises that Thirukkural does not engage with modern institutional mechanisms or global governance structures. Instead, it offers an ethical framework that reinforces contemporary understandings of sustainability. The study argues that sustainable development cannot be achieved through policy design alone but requires moral reorientation rooted in ethical accountability and social solidarity.

Keywords

Thirukkural; Sustainable Development Goals; Ethics; Conceptual Alignment; Sustainability

Downloads

References

1. Das, G. N. (1997). Readings from Thirukkural. Abhinav Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fukuda-Parr, S. (2016). From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender & Development, 24(1), 43-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Goulet, D. (1997). Development ethics: a new discipline. International Journal of Social Economics, 24(11), 1160- 1171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hickel, J. (2019). The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet. Sustainable development, 27(5), 873-884. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Laine, J. W. (2014). Meta-religion: Religion and power in world history. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Pope, G. U. (1886). The “Sacred” Kurraḷ of Tiruvaḷḷuva-Nāyanār: With introduction, grammar, translation, notes, lexicon, and concordance. W. H. Allen & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sen, A. (2014). Development as freedom. In R. McMichael (Ed.), The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Thilakavathy, M. (2019). Sangam Tamils: With special reference to Paṭṭinappālai. MJP Publisher. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zvelebil, K. V. (1974). A history of Indian literature: Dravidian literatures (Vol. 1). Otto Harrassowitz. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles