Impact of AI-Powered Chatbots Utilizing Big Data on Student Academic Performance: Evidence from Secondary Education in Sri Lanka

Authors

Wijayarathne S. K

Department of Computing, Esoft Uni Kandy (Sri Lanka)

Karunarathne V. L

Department of Computing, Esoft Uni Kandy (Sri Lanka)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.130200113

Subject Category: Artificial Intelligence

Volume/Issue: 13/2 | Page No: 1255-1262

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-18

Accepted: 2026-02-23

Published: 2026-03-07

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered chatbots utilizing big data analytics is transforming educational environments by enabling personalized and adaptive learning experiences (Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019). AI-powered chatbots have been increasingly adopted in educational contexts to enhance student engagement, provide real-time feedback, and support individualized instruction (Winkler & Söllner, 2018). This study investigates the impact of AI-powered chatbots on student academic performance in a secondary school in Sri Lanka. A quantitative research design was adopted using a positive philosophy and deductive approach. Data were collected from 165 students selected through stratified sampling from a population of 1,600 students across grades 10 to 13. Primary data were gathered through structured online questionnaires and analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, AI-Powered Chatbots, Student Academic Performance

Downloads

References

1. Abla, C., & Fraumeni, B. R. (2019). Student engagement: Evidence-based strategies to boost academic and social-emotional results. McREL International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Husaini, Y., & Ahmad Shukor, N. (2023). Factors affecting students’ academic performance: A review. Social Science Journal, 12(6), 284–294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2021). Data ethics in the age of COVID-19. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75276. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dasanayake, T., & Jayasinghe, J. (2021). Factors affecting academic performance of undergraduates: Case study in a state university of Sri Lanka. Journal of SACFIRE, 1(1), 67–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis and systematic review of the effect of chatbot technology use in sustainable education. Sustainability, 15, 2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mahmoud, H. (2022). A study of artificial intelligence-based chatbots in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(4), 231–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-global-institute/big-data-the-next-frontier-for-innovation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Okonkwo, C., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Franklin, M., Shenker, S., & Stoica, I. (2010). Spark: Cluster computing with working sets. In Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, J. M., Liu, J., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles