Lifecycle and Risk-Based Optimisation Framework for Condition-Triggered Maintenance of Flexible Pavement Networks Under Indian Traffic and Climatic Conditions

Traditional highway maintenance in India relies on fixed periodic resurfacing cycles, leading to resource inefficiencies and delayed repairs. This paper presents a framework for maximizing flexible pavement network life cycles through condition-triggered and risk-weighted optimization. The methodology integrates Indian Roads Congress (IRC) assessment techniques, specifically IRC:115 for structural evaluation and IRC:37 for design, with lifecycle economics and probabilistic risk modelling. Deterioration models were calibrated to account for tropical monsoon climates and Indian traffic heterogeneity.
The framework was validated through a 20-year case study of a 48-kilometer State Highway near Chennai, Tamil Nadu. Statistical validation via Monte Carlo simulation showed the optimized solution led to an 18% reduction in discounted life-cycle costs compared to traditional periodic resurfacing. Key improvements included a 26% increase in serviceable network duration and a 45% decrease in major structural strengthening interventions.
By shifting from age-based cycles to state-dependent optimization, this framework provides a robust and feasible pathway for Indian highway agencies to implement performance-based asset management. The results confirm that considering functional indices and structural assessments ensures fiscal resilience under budget constraints.

Pavement Management Systems (PMS); Lifecycle Cost Analysis (LCCA); Risk-based Asset Management; Flexible Pavement Deterioration; Condition-Triggered Maintenance.

1. Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., and Zaniewski, J. P. 1994. Modern Pavement Management. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Indian Roads Congress (IRC). 2014. IRC:115-2014—Guidelines for Structural Evaluation and Strengthening of Flexible Road Pavements Using Falling Weight Deflectometer. New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Indian Roads Congress (IRC). 2015. IRC:82-2015—Code of Practice for Maintenance of Bituminous Pavements. New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Indian Roads Congress (IRC). 2018. IRC:37-2018—Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements. New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kerali, H. G. R., Odoki, J. B., and Stannard, E. E. 2000. HDM-4 Highway Development and Management Model. World Bank, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH). 2022. Basic Road Statistics of India 2021-22. Government of India, New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Paterson, W. D. O. 1987. Road Deterioration and Maintenance Effects: Models for Planning and Management. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Transportation Research Board (TRB). 2010. Asset Management for Transportation Infrastructure Systems. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. OECD. 2001. Asset Management for the Roads Sector. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Shahin, M. Y. 2005. Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots. Springer, New York 11. Uddin, W., Hudson, W. R., and Haas, R. 2013. Public Infrastructure Asset Management. McGraw-Hill, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2011. Transportation Asset Management Guide: A Focus on Implementation. Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cambridge Systematics. 2006. Risk-Based Transportation Asset Management. NCHRP Report 551, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2016. Pavement Preservation: A Road Map for the Future. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., and Fricker, J. D. 2005. “Economic evaluation of highway asset preservation strategies.” Transportation Research Record, 1924, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Markow, M. J., and Hyman, W. A. 2009. Bridge and Highway Infrastructure Asset Management. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Odoki, J. B., and Kerali, H. G. R. 2000. HDM-4 Analytical Framework and Model Description. World Bank, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S. M. 2000. “Development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 6(1), 9–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fwa, T. F. 2005. “Network-level pavement management optimization.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131(5), 387–395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hall, K. T., Correa, C. E., Simpson, A. L., and Van Deusen, D. A. 2003. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Primer. FHWA, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Madanat, S., Mishalani, R., and Ibrahim, W. 1995. “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 1(2), 120–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Morcous, G. 2006. “Performance prediction of infrastructure systems using reliability modelling.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(3), 146–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhang, Z., and Durango-Cohen, P. 2013. “Dynamic programming optimization for pavement maintenance scheduling.” Transportation Research Part B, 57, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Hysteresis Behaviour and Energy Dissipation of Niger Delta Soil under Cyclic Loading Conditions
• Exploring Bamboo Leaf Ash as Supplementary Cementitious Material for Enhanced Performance in Compressive and Tension in Mortar Strength as Construction Materials
• Effect of Using a Combination of 50% Coal Dust 50 % Course Sand as Filler in Bituminous Mix Design
• A Review of the Current State of Lean Construction in Nairobi City County
• Adaptation of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt Predictive Models for Nigerian Climatic Conditions: A Transfer Learning Approach