Blockchain-Driven Secure Communication Framework for Next-Generation IoT Networks

The recent proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) has increased the desire to have a secure, efficient, and scalable network, especially to devices with resource constraints. This paper proposes a blockchain-based secure communication model in IoT networks of the next generation, combining decentralized authentication, lightweight consensus, smart contract-based access control, as well as edge/fog computing. The framework is divided into four layers: IoT Device Layer, Edge/Fog Layer, Blockchain Layer, and Application Layer that guarantee secure generation of data, preprocessing, validation of transactions, and real-time monitoring. An implementation of a prototype based on Hyperledger Fabric and NS-3 was performed and tested in terms of latency, throughput, energy use, smart contract execution time and time to validate a transaction. The findings indicate that the latency decreased by 145ms to 120ms, throughput increased by 80 to 92 transactions/sec, energy consumption dropped by 1.20W to 0.95W per device, smart contract execution time dropped by 40ms to 30ms, and transaction validation time dropped by 50ms to 40ms with six consecutive epochs. Real-time detection of attacks and operation resilience were also proved by the framework, confirming its usefulness in the context of the safe, open, and scalable IoT communication. The results validate the fact that blockchain combined with edge computing can be used to deliver an effective solution to improve security and efficiency in the IoT networks of the next generation.

Blockchain; Internet of Things (IoT); Secure Communication; Edge/Fog Computing

1. Ali, R. F., Muneer, A., Dominic, P. D. D., Taib, S. M., & Ghaleb, E. A. A. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT) Security Challenges and Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Advances in Cyber Security, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8059-5_9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almarri, S., & Aljughaiman, A. (2024). Blockchain Technology for IoT Security and Trust: A Comprehensive SLR. Sustainability, 16(23), 10177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, H., Lei, S., Zhang, Y., Han, X., Cao, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Blockchain-based Internet of Things Security Architecture and Applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14, 16703–16714. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-023-04675-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cherbal, S., Zier, A., Hebal, S., Louail, L., & Annane, B. (2024). Security in Internet of Things: A review on approaches based on blockchain, machine learning, cryptography, and quantum computing. The Journal of Supercomputing, 80, 3738–3816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05616-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. El Kafhali, S., Hanini, M., Chahir, C., & Salah, K. (2019). Architecture to Manage Internet of Things Data Using Blockchain and Fog Computing. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things (BDIoT’19), ACM. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338451359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elgountery, Y., Boushaba, A., Oualla, M., & Sadki, H. (2023). Blockchain Architecture for IoT: Comparative Survey. Computer Sciences & Mathematics Forum, 6(1), 7. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmsf2023006007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mahmoud, M. A., Gurunathan, M., Ramli, R., Babatunde, K. A., & Faisal, F. H. (2023). Review and Development of a Scalable Lightweight Blockchain Integrated Model (LightBlock) for IoT Applications. Electronics, 12(4), 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12041025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Maurya, V., Rishiwal, V., Yadav, M., Shiblee, M., Yadav, P., Agarwal, U., & Chaudhry, R. (2025). Blockchain-driven security for IoT networks: State-of-the-art, challenges and future directions. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-024-01812-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moudoud, H., Cherkaoui, S., & Khoukhi, L. (2022). An IoT Blockchain Architecture Using Oracles and Smart Contracts: the Use-Case of a Food Supply Chain. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.11370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nwakeze, O. M. (2024). The Impact of Blockchain Technology on Improving Cybersecurity Measures. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 6(06), 2967–2979. https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS59388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Padma, A., Ramaiah, M., & Ravi, V. (2025). A comprehensive review of lightweight blockchain practices for smart cities: a security and efficacy assessment. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments, 11(13). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-025-00254-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rahman, M. A., Islam, M. R., & Alazab, M. (2023). A Secure and Efficient Blockchain-Based Fog-IoT Framework for Industrial Applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.01.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Suresh Babu, E., Aswani Devi, A., Kavati, I., & Srinivasarao, B. K. N. (2023). Blockchain-Based Authentication Mechanism for Edge Devices in Fog-Enabled IoT Networks. TENCON 2023 – IEEE Region 10 Conference. https://conf.papercept.net/images/temp/TENCON/files/0299.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tawalbeh, L., Muheidat, F., Tawalbeh, M., & Quwaider, M. (2020). IoT Privacy and Security: Challenges and Solutions. Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4102. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet