Development of a Low-Cost Solar-Powered Wireless Sensor Network for Real-Time Soil and Water Quality Monitoring in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
Authors
Department of Electrical Electronic Engineering, Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000018
Subject Category: Computer Science
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 181-191
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-24
Accepted: 2026-03-03
Published: 2026-03-25
Abstract
This study presents the design, development, and pilot validation of a low-cost Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) prototype for real-time monitoring of soil and water quality parameters in selected communities of Akwa Ibom State. The system integrates multi-parameter soil and water sensors with an ESP32-based edge processing unit, LoRa long-range communication, and a cloud-based analytics platform for real-time visualization and alert generation. A 30-day pilot deployment was conducted across five communities to evaluate system performance and environmental conditions. Soil analysis revealed slightly acidic conditions (pH 5.1–5.9), moderate nitrogen deficiency, and localized potassium depletion. Water quality results showed spatial variation in turbidity (14-30 NTU), dissolved oxygen (4.3-6.2 mg/L), and conductivity (180-420 µS/cm), indicating potential anthropogenic influence in coastal and industrial zones. Validation against standard laboratory measurements (n = 60 paired samples per parameter) demonstrated strong agreement, with high correlation coefficients (r = 0.88-0.96, p < 0.001), low RMSE values, and acceptable Bland-Altman limits of agreement within defined sensor tolerances. A cost-benefit analysis showed an 83.5% reduction in 5-year lifecycle cost compared to conventional monitoring systems. The findings confirm that the proposed WSN provides a reliable, scalable, and economically sustainable solution for environmental monitoring and precision agriculture applications.
Keywords
Bland-Altman analysis, Cost-benefit analysis
Downloads
References
1. Adelantado, F., Vilajosana, X., Tuset-Peiró, P., Martinez, B., Melia-Seguí, J., & Watteyne, T. (2017). Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akpan, A. E., & Umoh, I. B. (2019). Assessment of soil and water contamination in oil-producing communities of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7356-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chapman, D. (Ed.). (2018). Water quality assessments: A guide to the use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring (2nd ed.). UNESCO/WHO/UNEP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2015). Status of the world’s soil resources (SWSR) – Main report. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), & Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils (ITPS). (2015). Status of the world’s soil resources (SWSR) – Technical summary. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. IPCC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jones, D. L., Cooledge, E. C., Hoyle, F. C., Griffiths, R. I., & Murphy, D. V. (2019). Soil monitoring technologies: Current status and future directions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 135, 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kansal, A., Hsu, J., Zahedi, S., & Srivastava, M. B. (2007). Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 6(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/1274858.1274870 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Mukhopadhyay, S. C., Jayasundera, K. P., & Postolache, O. (2021). Modern sensing technologies for environmental monitoring and IoT applications. Sensors, 21(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030734 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2022). Statistical report on environmental and agricultural indicators in Nigeria. NBS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Prüss-Ustün, A., Wolf, J., Bartram, J., Clasen, T., Cumming, O., Freeman, M. C., Gordon, B., Hunter, P. R., Medlicott, K., & Johnston, R. (2019). Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene for selected adverse health outcomes: An updated analysis. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 222(5), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Raza, U., Kulkarni, P., & Sooriyabandara, M. (2017). Low power wide area networks: An overview. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(2), 855–873. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Sharma, V., Kumar, R., & Mishra, R. (2019). Energy harvesting for IoT-based environmental monitoring systems: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 113, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2011). Environmental assessment of Ogoniland. UNEP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2021). Making peace with nature: A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. UNEP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Drinking-water quality guidelines (4th ed.). WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. World Health Organization (WHO), & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2021). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2020: Five years into the SDGs. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
- Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
- Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
- Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
- Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet