Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005: A Brief Review
Authors
Assistant Professor & Course Coordinator, Department of Rural Development, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Srikakulam, Etcherla, Andhra Pradesh (India)
Assistant Professor, Department of Rural Development, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Srikakulam, Etcherla, Andhra Pradesh (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000042
Subject Category: Development Studies
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 472-476
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-08
Accepted: 2026-03-14
Published: 2026-03-27
Abstract
The Govt. of India is set to introduce a new rural employment law in the Lok Sabha, proposing to repeal the two-decade-old Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with another legislation, titled the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G) Bill, 2025. The bill seeks to replace the MGNREGA with a revamped framework aimed at aligning rural employment and development with the national vision of Viksit Bharat 2047. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (MGNREGA) is considered to be a game changer for rural India. India's rural economy remains the backbone of its socio-economic condition, with approximately 60% of the population residing in rural areas and a majority dependent on agriculture and allied activities. Yet, the sector faces persistent structural challenges that manifest as agrarian distress, including fragmented landholdings, low productivity, scarcity of irrigation, and fluctuating market prices the study evaluates the scheme’s effects on employment, income, women’s empowerment, poverty, and migration. The review confirms that MGNREGA has significantly improved rural livelihoods by providing income security, enhancing women's participation, and reducing distress migration. However, the analysis also highlights persistent implementation challenges, including regional disparities, wage payment delays, and corruption. The findings are summarized using tables to provide a robust, evidence-based assessment for policymakers and researchers. In light of such questions, this article, rather than engaging in debate over the various divisions of opinion, lets the figures speak for themselves. It collates the relevant statistics in user-friendly form and the concluding analysis then briefly analyses particularly the inter-state differences in the MGNREGS performance for the period of 2006–25.
Keywords
MGNREGA, Agriculture, socio-economic impact
Downloads
References
1. Afridi, F., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Sahoo, S. (2012). "Female labor force participation and child education in India: The effect of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme." IZA Discussion Paper No. 6593. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Imbert, C., & Papp, J. (2015). "Labor Market Effects of Social Programs: Evidence from India’s Employment Guarantee." American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 233-263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2019). "Impact Assessment of MGNREGA on Rural Livelihoods and Food Security." UNDP India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD), Government of India. (2022, 2023). "MGNREGA Annual Reports." [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Sudha, V., & Reddy, M. S. (2017). "Environmental Assets and MGNREGA: A Study in Andhra Pradesh." Social Change, 47(1), 43-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Narayanan, S. (2016). "Women and MGNREGA: ‘Silent Revolution’ in Rural India?" Economic and Political Weekly, 51(3), 53-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bhatia, B., & Dreze, J. (2006). "Employment Guarantee in Rural India: Toward a Rights-Based Approach." Economic and Political Weekly, 41(4), 319-324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Keshri, K., & Bhagat, R. B. (2012). "Temporary and Seasonal Migration in India." Genus, 68(1), 25 54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Dreze, J., & Khera, R. (2009). "The Battle for Employment Guarantee." Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ravi, S., & Engler, M. (2015). "Workfare as an Effective Way to Fight Poverty: The Case of India’s NREGS." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Khera, R., & Nayak, N. (2009). "Women Workers and Perceptions of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act." Economic and Political Weekly, 44(43), 49-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG). (2020). "Performance Audit Report on MGNREGA." Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Dhorajiwala, S. (2018). "Challenges of Aadhaar in Wage Payments and Exclusion Errors." The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 61(2), 385-402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- An Exploration of Stakeholders Perceived Mitigation Measures for Addressing Sanitation Challenges in George Compound in Lusaka Zambia
- Public Participation in Sustainable Development Programs: Examining Public Participation Methods and Levels at Pustaka Negeri Sarawak
- Responding to Climate Change through Livelihood Diversification: Implications of Household Economic Well-Being in Coastal Greater Accra
- Teacher Character Development Through Virtue and Eudaimonia: Insights from Nominal Group Technique (NGT)
- Transformation of Muslim Friendly Hospitality: An Overview of Shariah Compliant Tourism Development in Malaysia