Fairness Matters: Organizational Justice and Creative Self-Efficacy in Educational Institutions

Educational institutions increasingly rely on teachers and academic staff to demonstrate creativity and innovation in teaching, curriculum development, and problem-solving. However, the psychological and organizational conditions that foster creative capability among educators remain insufficiently explored. This conceptual paper examines the relationship between organizational justice and creative self-efficacy within educational institutions, including primary, secondary, and tertiary education. Drawing on Social Cognitive Theory and Organizational Justice Theory, the paper proposes that perceptions of fairness within institutions, namely, distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice play a key role in fostering educators’ beliefs in their ability to produce creative outcomes. Creative self-efficacy represents educators’ confidence in their capacity to generate innovative teaching practices and solutions. The paper synthesizes prior empirical and theoretical literature to develop a conceptual framework linking organizational justice to creative self-efficacy among educators. The study argues that fair organizational practices enhance psychological empowerment, trust, and motivation, thereby strengthening creative confidence among educators and academics. The paper concludes by outlining implications for educational leadership, institutional governance, and future empirical research aimed at improving innovative capacity in educational systems.

Creative self-efficacy, educational innovation, higher education, organizational justice

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adamska, K., & Jurek, P. (2021). Come and say what you think: reducing employees’ self-censorship through procedural and interpersonal justice. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9(4), 328. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.110022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bao, Y. (2024). A dual mediation model of the association between principal inclusive leadership and teacher innovative behavior. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 12320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cayırdağ, N. (2017). Creativity Fostering Teaching: Impact of Creative Self-efficacy and Teacher Efficacy. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.6.0437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2013). Explaining the justice–performance relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 394–417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of management perspectives, 21(4), 34-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Etikariena, A., & Widyasari, P. (2020). Quality education to succeed the SDGs among college students through the role of learner empowerment and creative self-efficacy to develop innovative work behavior. E3S Web of Conferences, 211, 1018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021101018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fang, Y. H., & Chang, Y. C. (2023). Effect of creative self-efficacy on creativity among college students: The moderating effect of college innovation climate. International Journal of Higher Education, 12(5), 128-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Greenberg, J. (2017). Promote procedural justice to enhance acceptance of work outcomes. The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behaviour, 189-204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Greenberg, J. (2017). Promote Procedural Justice to Enhance Acceptance of Work Outcomes (p. 189). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164047.ch13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hayati, P. F. A., Mistima, M. S., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). The Relationship between Teacher’s Self-Efficacy and Creative Teaching of Primary Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(5), 340. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Huang, M., Zhang, M., & Greenier, V. (2025). Modeling the contribution of self‐efficacy, collective efficacy, and autonomy to professional creativity of Chinese EFL teachers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 1826-1846. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Huang, X., Lee, J. C. K., & Dong, X. (2020). Mapping the factors influencing creative teaching: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Liu, H., & Wang, I. (2019). Creative teaching behaviors of health care school teachers in Taiwan: mediating and moderating effects. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1641-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Newman, A., Tse, H. H., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior. Journal of Business Research, 84, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. OECD. (2020). Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Turnover Intentions among Teachers in the Offinso South District of Ghana. (2018). European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.2.235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Osman, Z., & Mohamad, R. K. (2024). Unveiling Innovative Work Behavior among Academicians in Open Online Flexible Distance Learning Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(10), 1381-1394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sopiah, S., Sangadji, E. M., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2021). The Impact of Organizational Justice, Self-Efficacy and Teachers Performance: The Mediating Role of Internal Motivation. Pedagogika, 141(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2021.141.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Susanti, S., & Ardi, A. (2022). The Effect of Digital Transformational Leadership, Creative Self-Efficacy on Innovative Behaviour Mediated by Perceived Organizational Support. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(8), 3111. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i8.802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Thi, T. D. P., & Duong, N. T. (2024). Investigating learning burnout and academic performance among management students: a longitudinal study in English courses. BMC Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01725-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Yang, C. (2024). Teacher autonomy, creative self-efficacy, and innovative behavior: Perspectives from Chinese university EFL teachers. Arab World English Journal, 15(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yaşar, E., & TÜR, E. (2022). The Effects of Creative Self-Efficacy and Emotional State on Employees’ Coping Styles with Stress. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.1205439 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhang, L., & Huang, J.-H. (2023). Can Paternalistic Leadership Promote Chinese College Teachers’ Creativity? Understanding the Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Higher Education, 12(5), 195. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v12n5p195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• “Digital Detox and Employee Health: Talent Management Strategies for Reducing Digital Overload”
• Consumer Perception, Knowledge, and Practice of Traditional Herbal Medicines: A Case Study from Besut, Terengganu