Community-Based Collective Care and Resilience Among LGBTQ Populations in Rural Nigeria: The Calabar Case Study

Authors

Aondoakaa Lubem

Department of Programs, Initiative for Health and Equality, Calabar, Cross River State (Nigeria.)

Enah Joy Egbaka

Department of Programs, Initiative for Health and Equality, Calabar, Cross River State (Nigeria.)

Ebenezer Esidene Eneji

Department of Programs, Initiative for Health and Equality, Calabar, Cross River State (Nigeria.)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000080

Subject Category: Public Health

Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 881-891

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-13

Accepted: 2026-03-19

Published: 2026-04-01

Abstract

Marginalized communities often develop adaptive support systems to maintain wellbeing in environments characterized by stigma, legal restrictions, and limited institutional protection. In Nigeria, the Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act has contributed to heightened social exclusion and barriers to healthcare for LGBTQ populations, particularly in rural areas. This study examines how community-based collective care initiatives support resilience, psychosocial wellbeing, and continuity of SRHR/HIV-related services among LGBTQ individuals in Calabar, Cross River State. Using a community-based case study design, the research documents crisis-response strategies implemented after the vandalism of a community center serving LGBTQ individuals. The intervention framework included peer-led psychosocial support, mutual aid mechanisms, safety protocol development, and participatory governance through a community-led crisis committee. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) among participants (n = 50), while perceived social isolation was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale among a subset of participants (n = 30) through pre- and post-intervention surveys. Results indicate improvements in psychosocial wellbeing and social connectedness, with anxiety symptoms decreasing by approximately 30% and loneliness scores declining by 40% following the intervention. These findings highlight the role of community-led collective care models in strengthening resilience and sustaining essential health services among marginalized populations in restrictive social environments. However, findings should be interpreted as exploratory due to the absence of a control group and reliance on descriptive statistical analysis.

Keywords

Collective Care, Community Resilience, LGBTQ Health

Downloads

References

1. Baral, S., Beyrer, C., Muessig, K., Poteat, T., Wirtz, A., Decker, M., Sherman, S., & Kerrigan, D. (2013). Burden of HIV among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 12(7), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70066-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beyrer, C., Sullivan, P., Sanchez, J., Dowdy, D., Altman, D., Trapence, G., Collins, C., Katabira, E., Kazatchkine, M., Sidibé, M., & Mayer, K. (2012). The increase in global HIV epidemics in MSM. The Lancet, 380(9839), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60821-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2016). Structural stigma and the health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414523775 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hobart, H. J. K., & Kneese, T. (2020). Radical care: Survival strategies for uncertain times. Social Text, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7971067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Human Rights Watch. (2016). “Tell me where I can be safe”: The impact of Nigeria’s Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act. New York: Human Rights Watch https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/10/20/tell-me-where-i-can-be-safe/impact-nigerias-same-sex-marriage-prohibition-act [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA). (2023). State-sponsored homophobia 2023: Global legislation overview update. Geneva: ILGA World. https://ilga.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kirmayer, L. J., Dandeneau, S., Marshall, E., Phillips, M., & Williamson, K. J. (2011). Rethinking resilience from Indigenous perspectives. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Logie, C. H., & Earnshaw, V. A. (2015). Adapting stigma frameworks to understand intersectional stigma. Social Science & Medicine, 146, 96–104.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Meyer, I. H. (2015). Resilience in the study of minority stress and health of sexual and gender minorities. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Poteat, T., Scheim, A., Xavier, J., Reisner, S., & Baral, S. (2016). Global epidemiology of HIV infection and related syndemics affecting transgender people. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 72(Suppl 3), S210–S219.https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Spade, D. (2020). Mutual aid: Building solidarity during this crisis (and the next). London: Verso Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Stangl, A. L., Earnshaw, V., Logie, C. H., Van Brakel, W., Simbayi, L., Barré, I., & Dovidio, J. F. (2019). The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework. BMC Medicine, 17, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1271-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tronto, J. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. UNAIDS. (2022). In danger: UNAIDS global AIDS update 2022. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2022/in-danger-global-aids-update [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNAIDS. (2023). Global AIDS update 2023: The path that ends AIDS. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. https://www.unaids.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2019). Legal environment assessment for HIV and the law in Nigeria. New York: UNDP. https://www.undp.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wirtz, A. L., Kamba, D., Jumbe, V., Trapence, G., Gubin, R., Umar, E., Ketende, S., Berry, M., Baral, S., & Beyrer, C. (2017). A qualitative assessment of health seeking practices among and provision practices for men who have sex with men in Malawi. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 17, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-017-0121-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles