Characterization of Cassava Cultivars Morphological and Agronomic Features for Compatibility with Mechanized Farming Practices in Nigeria

Objective. This study examined the diversity of improved cassava varieties using their morphological and agronomic characteristics to determine their compatibility with field mechanization and processing.
Materials and Methods. The Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) experiment was conducted in 2025 cropping season.The treatments were recently developed twenty (20) cassava genotypes and one local check.Using three replications, nine (9) stands of each genotype were planted at 1m x 1m spacing on 3m x 3m plots. The shoot morphologies were evaluated using their traits before and during harvest while their storage roots were sampled at 9 and 12 months after planting (MAP).
Results. showed that some of the tall cultivars (2.3 – 3.5m) UMUCASS 50 ,TMS 920057 and Local check have erect stems with cylindrical plant shape, while the remaining UMUCASS 39,32 and 54, have high dichomotous or trichomatous narrow angle branches which gave umbrella plant shape were all compatible with field mechanical operations like stem harvesting, leaves stripping and packing. In addition with TMS 980505,NR 87184 and NR 8082 they also have cylindrical/conical root shape storage roots that weighs (1.5 -11.33kg/plant) that were high in dry matter(15 – 64%) and starch(12 - 37%) which also made them compatible with mechanical processing.
Conclusion. UMUCASS 50, 39,32, 54,TMS 920057, 980505, NR 87184 , NR 8082 and the Local check have shoot morphological and storage roots agronomic characteristics that are compatible with field mechanization and processing. Provided that some of a given cassava genotype traits are known, we developed a comprehensive chart that shows the level of field and processing mechanization of any given cassava genotype.

cassava genotypes,characterization,mechanization,morphology, compatibility.

1. Akingbala, J. O., Oyewole, O. B., Uzo-Peters, P. I., Karim, R. O. &Baccus-Taylor, G. S. (2005). Evaluating stored cassava quality in gariproduction.Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 3(1), 75-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amarullah , D. Indradewa , P. Yudono & B. H. dan Sunarminto, 2016. Photosynthetic Activity of Superior Varieties and Local Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 8, No. 8; 2016. doi:10.5539/jas.v8n8p194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amponsah SK, Bobobee EYH, Agyare WA, Okyere JB, Aveyire J, King SR (2017). Mechanical Cassava Harvesting as Influenced by Seedbed Preparation and Cassava Variety.Appl. Eng. Agric. 30:391- 403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anikwe,MartinA.N.andEjike E. Ikenganyia(2018):Ecophysiology and Production Principles of Cassava (Manihot species) in Southeastern Nigeria.http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70828. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2005). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cassava In Tropical Africa: A Reference Manual (1990). International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Ibadan, Nigeria.ISBN 978 131 041 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ceballos, H.; Ramirez, J.; Bellotti, A.C.; Jarvis, A.; Alvarez, E. (2011): Adaptation of cassava to Changing Climates. In Crop Adaptation to Climate Change; Yadav, S., Redden, B., Hatfield, J.L., Lotze-Campen, H., Eds.;Wiley-Blackwell Publishers: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 411–425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chamsing, A., A. Senanarong, S. Sngiamphongse, P. Sutthiwaree, Y. Ksaehancharpong, K. Wannarong, and P. Sangphanta. 2012. Research and development of a Cassava digger attached to 50 hp tractor. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, Proceeding of International Symposium on Agricultural and Bio-Systems Engineering for ASIA Sustainability: Opportunity and Channenge. Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh city – Vietnam, 29-30 March 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chuasuwan,C.(2017)Cassava Industry. Thailand Industry Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.krungsri.com/bank/getmedia/709bbaca-5132-40c2-970f-33253ecc5b50/IO_Cassava_2017_EN.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dixon AGO, OnyekaR. Bandy opadhyay, R.U. Okechukwu, andB. Bamkefa, TJ (2005) Distribution and status of bacterialblight and fungal diseases of cassava in Nigeria IITA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Egesi, C.N. (2023) (Ed).NRCRI at 100. NRCRI Publications: National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike,Abia State Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fukuda, W.M.G., C.L. Guevara, R. Kawuki, and M.E. Ferguson. 2010. Selected morphological and agronomic descriptors for the characterization of cassava. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. IITA. (2013 ). Nigeria Releases Improved Cassava Varieties to Boost Productivity. News - 2013 archive. Retrieved from https://www.iita.org/news-item/nigeria-releases-improved-cassava-varieties-boost-productivity/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ikegwu, O., Nwobasi, V., Odoh, M. & Oledinma, N. (2009). Evaluation of the pasting and some functional properties of starch isolated from some improved cassava varieties in Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(10), 2310-2315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Karim Olayinka Ramota and Olaide Akinwunmi Akintayo (2021):Morphological And Chemical Characteristics Of Different Cassava Varieties In Relation To The Quality Attributes Of Their Gari (Roasted Fermented Cassava Grits). J Microbiol Biotech Food Sci / Karim and Akintayo 2021 : 11 (3) e2879. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ma,S., M. Karkee, P. A. Scharf, Q. Zhang(2014)Sugarcane Harvester Technology: A Critical Overview.Applied Engineering in Agriculture Vol. 30(5): 727-739 727 © 2014 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers ISSN 0883-8542 DOI 10.13031/aea.30.10696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oliveira EJ, Filho OSO and Santos VS (2014).Selection of the most informative morphoagronomic descriptors for cassava germplasm.Pesq.Agr. Bras 49: 891-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2014001100008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Otekunrin, O. A., and Sawicka, B. (2017). Cassava, a 21st century staple crop: how can Nigeria harness its enormous trade potentials? Acta Scientific Agriculture, 3(8), 194-202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Oyeyinka, S. A., Ajayi, O. I., Gbadebo, C. T., Kayode, R. M., Karim, O. R. & Adeloye, A. A. (2019). Physicochemical properties of gari prepared from frozen cassava roots. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 99, 594-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.10.004 Phi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Paradis, E., and Schliep, K. (2019).ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics, 35, 526–528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Peres-Neto, P. R., Jackson, D. A., and Somers, K. M. (2003). Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology, 84, 2347–2363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Prasad, S. 2005. Design and develop machine for digging and gathering cassava roots. Kasetsart University thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Kasetsart University, Thailand. (in Thai). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tarawali,G., P. Ilona, I.A. Ojiako,C. Iyangbe, D.S. Ogundijo, G. Asumugha, and U.E. Udensi.(2013):A comprehensive training module on competitive cassava production. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.40 pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wossen, T., Girma, G., Abdoulaye, T., Rabbi, I., Olanrewaju, A., Alene, A., Feleke, S., Kulakow, P., Asumugha, G., Abass, A. &Manyong, V. (2017).The Cassava MonitoringSurveyinNigeria. Retrievedfromhttps://www.iita.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/The_Cassava_Monitoring_Survey_in_Nigeria.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]