National Education Policy 2020: An Assessment of Higher Educational Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in India

Inclusive education has taken a center stage in the modern educational policy systems throughout the globe with the focus on fair access to good education by all learners irrespective of their physical, sensory, intellectual and socio-economic variations. Students with disabilities (SwDs) have traditionally had a hard time attending higher education in India because of the infrastructures, social stigma, unsuccessful institutional support, and policy implementation gaps. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 is a radical reform agenda aimed at changing the Indian education system by ensuring accessibility, equity, and inclusivity. Inclusion of socially and educationally disadvantaged groups such as students with disabilities in tertiary education institutions is one of the key areas of concern of the policy. This paper is a critical analysis of what NEP 2020 says in the area of disability inclusion in higher education and the level to which these provisions focus on the structural and institutional barriers confronting students with disabilities.

Inclusive education, Students with disabilities (SwDs)

1. Borg, J., Lindström, A., & Larsson, S. (2011). Assistive technology in developing countries: A review from the perspective of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 35(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364610389351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Government of India, Ministry of Education. (2020). National education policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Government of India. (2016). The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Ministry of Law and Justice. https://legislative.gov.in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. MHRD. (2019). All India survey on higher education (AISHE) report 2018–2019. Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Miles, S., & Singal, N. (2010). The education for all and inclusive education debate: Conflict, contradiction or opportunity? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802265125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A review of research on universal design educational models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2017). Integrated education in India: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1197320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Singal, N. (2016). Education of children with disabilities in India and Pakistan: Critical analysis of developments in the last 15 years. Prospects, 46(1), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-016-9383-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education – All means all. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. University Grants Commission. (2018). Guidelines for higher education institutions for students with disabilities. UGC, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. WHO & World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Bank. (2019). Disability inclusion and accountability framework. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
• Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
• Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
• Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
• Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions