A Multi-Criteria Spatial Analysis of Habitat Quality and Threat Dynamics in the Mangrove Ecosystems of Puttalam Lagoon
Authors
Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geomatics, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)
Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geomatics, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000136
Subject Category: Environment
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 1577-1585
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-22
Accepted: 2026-03-28
Published: 2026-04-08
Abstract
Puttalam Lagoon, a significant coastal ecosystem in Sri Lanka, faces multiple threats destroying its biodiversity and the crucial ecosystem services it provides to local communities. This research focuses on identifying critical Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) within Puttalam Lagoon, considering both threats and ecosystem services. Through a comprehensive literature review and Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis, this study examines the interplay between biodiversity, threats, and habitat quality to prioritize conservation efforts effectively. The research reveals that Puttalam Lagoon's rich biodiversity is crucial for supporting local livelihoods and maintaining ecosystem health. However, anthropogenic pressures such as pollution from agricultural runoff, sewage, and industrial waste, coupled with climate change impacts, pose significant risks to the lagoon's biodiversity and ecosystem services.
By employing methodologies like the InVEST model and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this study identifies areas within Puttalam Lagoon that require immediate conservation attention. Regions such as Manalthivu, Mudalappaliya, Musalpitiya, Kurinjipitiya, Wannimundalama, Anawasala, and Deuch Bay are highlighted as particularly vulnerable to threats, emphasizing the need for targeted conservation interventions. Conversely, areas with higher habitat quality, offer opportunities for proactive conservation measures to safeguard their ecological integrity and maximize ecosystem service provision. The findings show that Manalthivu, Musalpitiya, Kurinjipitiya, Wannimundalama, Anawasala, and Deuch Bay need a conservation process.
In conclusion, this research provides valuable insights into the critical KBAs of Puttalam Lagoon, offering the first steps to identify the areas that require priority to be conserved and actionable policy recommendations for local governments and conservation practitioners. By prioritizing conservation efforts in vulnerable areas and enhancing ecosystem resilience, biodiversity and ecosystem services can be protected, promoting sustainable development and the well-being of people and the planet.
Keywords
Puttalam lagoon, Threat mapping, InVEST
Downloads
References
1. Admasu, S., Yeshitela, K. & Argaw, M. 2023. Assessing habitat quality using the InVEST model in the Dire and Legedadi watersheds, central highland of Ethiopia: Implication for watershed management. Sustainable Environment, 9, 2242137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Amarasinghe, M. & Balasubramaniam, S. 1992. Net primary productivity of two mangrove forest stands on the northwestern coast of Sri Lanka. Hydrobiologia, 247, 37-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bandara, K., et al. (2019). 2019. Avifauna of Puttalam Lagoon, Sri Lanka: distribution, abundance and threats. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 11(10), 14334-14342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ekanayake, L. 2016. Environmental status and issues of Puttalam Lagoon–A case study in six coastal villages. Sri Lanka Turtle Conservation Project. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Hall, L.S., Krausman, P.R. And Morrison, M.L., 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife society bulletin, pp.173-182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. IUCN 2016. A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas, Version 1.0. First edition. Gland, Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Pathirana, K., Kamal, A., Riyas, M. & Safeek, A. 2008. Management of coastal resources in Puttalam lagoon, Sri Lanka. Paper No: P-06 COPEDEC VII. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Saaty, T. L. 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48, 9-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Shrestha, M., Piman, T. & Grünbühel, C. 2021. Prioritizing key biodiversity areas for conservation based on threats and ecosystem services using participatory and GIS-based modeling in Chindwin River Basin, Myanmar. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Weragodathenna, D. 2022. GIS Atlas for Puttalam Lagoon (Eng.Version) - As an Assistance for Natural Resource Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Zhou, G., Huan, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, R., Liang, T., Dunn, M. E., Yao, F. & Tong, Y. 2023. Identifying ecological priority areas for synergistic conservation across scales in the Asian Water Tower region. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 9, 0036. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
- Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
- Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
- Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area