An Examination of Hong Kong's Emerging Pet Economy and Its Implications for Environmental Hygiene, Food and Beverage Business, and Public Transportation
Authors
CEng, RPE, MHKIE, MI Fire E, MHKICM, FCIBSE, FI Mech E, FIE. Aust, FCABE, FHKICA, FCIPHE., Founder and Managing Director of Lordray Engineering Company Limited (Malaysia)
MCGI, CMgr, FCMI, FIMA, Adjunct Professor of Spectrum International University College (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000144
Subject Category: Governance
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 1652-1659
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-19
Accepted: 2026-03-24
Published: 2026-04-08
Abstract
This article explores recent policy efforts in Hong Kong aimed at fostering a pet economy by easing longstanding restrictions on pets in restaurants and public transportation. Utilizing government documents, legislative drafts, media coverage, and stakeholder input, the study examines the complex effects of these changes on environmental hygiene, the food and beverage sector, and public transit. The findings suggest that although the policies respond to demographic trends (9.4% of households own around 400,000 cats and dogs) their implementation exposes a tension between economic goals and public health concerns. The government’s phased strategy, which encourages voluntary adoption and grants operational discretion to businesses, reflects a tentative attempt to balance these competing interests. Nonetheless, unresolved issues persist, including responsibility for hygiene-related incidents, the impact on patrons without pets, and whether existing infrastructure can adequately support these changes. The article contends that the effectiveness of Hong Kong’s pet-friendly policies will rely not only on regulatory adjustments but also on fostering a culture of responsible pet ownership and enhancing public awareness regarding coexistence between humans and animals.
Keywords
economic goals, environmental hygiene, pet economy, pet-friendly policies, public health
Downloads
References
1. Arluke, A., Sanders, C., & Irvine, L. (2022). Regarding animals. Temple University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Census and Statistics Department. (2019). Thematic Household Survey Report No. 66. Hong Kong: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Food and Environmental Hygiene Department. (2025). A Guide to Application for Restaurant Licences. Hong Kong: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (2026). Allowing Dogs to Enter Permitted Food Premises. Available at https://www.fehd.gov.hk/english/licensing/dog_restaurants/index.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Geil, R. (2018). The effect of pet-friendly policies on organizational attractiveness (Master's thesis, Xavier University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Haldeman, T., & Schmidt, W. (2022). Using community-based social marketing to reduce pet waste bacteria in streams. Social Marketing Quarterly, 28(2), 109-129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hong Kong Commercial Daily (2026). Tam Chun-kwok urges expedited amendments to better protect animal rights and build a society where humans and pets coexist harmoniously. Available at https://www.hkcd.com.hk/hkcdweb/content/2026/03/12/content_8744579.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hong Kong Free Press (2025). Policy Address 2025: Pet dogs to be allowed inside restaurants under new licensing scheme. Available at https://hongkongfp.com/2025/09/17/policy-address-2025-pet-dogs-to-be-allowed-inside-restaurants-under-new-licensing-scheme/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Irvine, L., & Cilia, L. (2017). More‐than‐human families: Pets, people, and practices in multispecies households. Sociology compass, 11(2), e12455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kellershohn, J., & Habib, R. (2024). Barks and bites: dog-friendly dining experiences. World Leisure Journal, 66(4), 559-579. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kent, J. L., Mulley, C., & Stevens, N. (2020). Challenging policies that prohibit public transport use: Travelling with pets as a case study. Transport Policy, 99, 86-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Lu, X., Jiang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, M., & Wu, J. (2022). Current situation of pet economy development under post-epidemic period. AJBM, 4, 117-123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Martin, E. J., Oliveira, D. S., Oliveira, L. S., & Bezerra, B. S. (2021). Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil. Waste Management, 119, 226-234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. McConnell, A. R., Paige Lloyd, E., & Humphrey, B. T. (2019). We are family: Viewing pets as family members improves wellbeing. Anthrozoös, 32(4), 459-470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. MTR Corporation. (2025). “Cat/Dog Carrying Trial Scheme” on Light Rail. Available at https://www.mtr.com.hk/archive/corporate/en/press_release/PR-25-061-E.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. MTR Corporation. (2025a). "Cat/dog carrying" scheme on light rail during weekends and public holidays. Available at https://www.mtr.com.hk/en/customer/main/pet-carrying.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Wong, J. T. F., & Wong, M. H. (2025). Laws and Regulations of Food. Ecological and Human Health Impacts of Contaminated Food and Environments, 30-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kellershohn, J., & Habib, R. (2024). Barks and bites: dog-friendly dining experiences. World Leisure Journal, 66(4), 559-579. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Oriental Daily News (2026). Whether the pet-friendly valley economy will be effective remains to be seen. Available at https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/commentary/20260204/bkn-20260204000409919-0204_00832_001.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Wunderlich, N. V., Mosteller, J., Beverland, M. B., Downey, H., Kraus, K., Lin, M. H., & Syrjälä, H. (2021). Animals in our lives: An interactive well-being perspective. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(4), 646-662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Wunderlich, N. V., Mosteller, J., Beverland, M. B., Downey, H., Kraus, K., Lin, M. H., & Syrjälä, H. (2021). Animals in our lives: An interactive well-being perspective. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(4), 646-662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zhang, X., Liu, S., & Shao, X. (2025). How pet-owning restaurant customers’ experiences shape their emotional reactions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Yu, Y., & Yang, X. (2025). Multispecies urbanism: Emerging dog parks in Shanghai. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 8(2), 624-641. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Regional Development Planning Strategy Through the Integration of Strengthening Village-Owned Enterprises and the Transparency Utilisation of Village Funds
- Corporate Governance, Corruption and Financial Performance of Listed Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Companies in Nigeria.
- The Impacts of Digital Governance in Strengthening Tax Compliance and Enhanced Revenue Mobilisation in Sierra Leone
- Gender Impact of Values Education and Good Governance on National Development: A Study of Bangladesh
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices towards Infrastructural Developments along the Riparian Ecosystem of the Nairobi River Basin, Kenya