Vetiver-Based Vertical Helophyte Filtration Systems for Sustainable Backyard Swine Wastewater Management: A Review

Swine wastewater, particularly from backyard production systems, represents a significant environmental challenge due to its high concentrations of organic matter, nutrients, and microbial contaminants. In many developing regions, including the Philippines, small-scale swine farmers often lack access to efficient and affordable wastewater treatment systems, leading to the discharge of untreated effluents into the environment. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the application of Vertical Helophyte Filtration Systems (VHFS) as a sustainable, nature-based solution for treating swine wastewater. VHFS integrates physical, chemical, and biological processes through the use of filter media, microbial communities, and helophytic plants to reduce pollutant loads. Particular emphasis is given to the role of vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides), which has demonstrated strong phytoremediation potential due to its extensive root system, high tolerance to environmental stress, and capacity for nutrient uptake and contaminant stabilization. Evidence from existing studies indicates that vetiver-based filtration systems can achieve substantial reductions in biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), nutrients, suspended solids, and selected emerging contaminants. Additionally, treated effluent may be reused for agricultural purposes, contributing to improved water use efficiency and reduced freshwater demand. Despite these advantages, system performance is influenced by factors such as substrate composition, hydraulic retention time, plant density, and pollutant loading, highlighting the need for site-specific optimization. This review underscores the potential of vetiver-based VHFS as a cost-effective and environmentally sustainable wastewater management approach for backyard swine production, while also identifying key research gaps and opportunities for system improvement and wider adoption.

Vetiver grass; Vertical Helophyte Filtration System; swine wastewater

1. Akratos CS, Tsihrintzis VA (2007) Effect of temperature, HRT, veg-etation and porous media on removal efficiency of pilot-scalehorizontal subsurface flow CWs. Ecol Eng 29(2):173–191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aldaya, M. M., Muñoz, G., Guillén-Climent, M. L., & Chico, D. (2021). Water footprint and life cycle assessment of agricultural products: A review of methodological approaches and case studies. Science of the Total Environment, 772, 145–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aregu MB, Soboksa NE, Kanno GG. (2021). High Strength Wastewater Reclamation Capacity of Vetiver Grass in Tropics: The Case of Ethiopia. Environ Health Insights. 2021 Nov 23;15:11786302211060162. doi: 10.1177/11786302211060162. PMID: 34866909; PMCID: PMC8637771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Badejo, A.A., Omole, D.O. & Ndambuki, J.M. (2018). Municipal wastewater management using Vetiveria zizanioides planted in vertical flow constructed wetland. Appl Water Sci 8, 110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0756-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bai, Y., Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. (2022). Enhancing the performance of vertical helophyte filtration systems through combined technologies. Water Research, 211, 118058. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bôto, M. L., Dias, S. M., Crespo, R. D., Mucha, A. P., & Almeida, C. M. R. (2023). Removing chemical and biological pollutants from swine wastewater through constructed wetlands aiming reclaimed water reuse. Journal of Environmental Management, 326(Part A), 116642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Boulay, A. M., Bare, J., Benini, L., Berger, M., Lathuillière, M. J., Manzardo, A., Margni, M., Motoshita, M., Núñez, M., Pastor, A. V., Ridoutt, B., Oki, T., Worbe, S., & Pfister, S. (2018). The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: Assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Science of the Total Environment, 613–614, 1289–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Burow, K. R., Nolan, B. T., & Rupert, M. G. (2020). Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Practices on Water Resources. Environmental Science & Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Calderon, M. M., Francisco, C. L., & Labadan, J. C. (2016). Backyard swine production and its economic contribution to rural households in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 53(2), 123–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, Y., Shen, Z., & Li, X. (2004). The use of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) in the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Applied Geochemistry, 19(10), 1553-1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.02.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cheng, J., Xu, J., Huang, Y., & Wang, K. (2017). Characteristics and treatment of swine wastewater: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(11), 10083–10100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8614-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cornejo, P. K., Zhang, Q., Mihelcic, J. R., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2021). Water reuse for livestock wastewater management: Circular economy approach to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management, 277, 111479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111479 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Danh, L. T., Truong, P., Mammucari, R., Tran, T., & Foster, N. (2009). Vetiver Grass, Vetiveria zizanioides: A Choice Plant For Phytoremediation of heavy metals and organic wastes. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 11(8), 664-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510902787302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Deng, L., Zheng, D., Zhang, J., Yang, H., Wang, L., Wang, W., He, T., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Treatment and utilization of swine wastewater: A review on technologies in full-scale application. Science of the Total Environment, 879, 163223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR). (2019). Sustainable livestock and aquaculture production systems: Policies and practices. DA-BFAR Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2016). DENR Administrative Order No. 2016-08: Water Quality Guidelines and General Effluent Standards of 2016. Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Di Cristo, C., Sfarra, S., & Guerrini, A. (2020). Effectiveness of vertical helophytes filtration systems in treating urban wastewater. Science of the Total Environment, 740, 140154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Díaz, E., Martínez, G., & Sánchez, R. (2021). Vertical helophytes filtration: System design and performance. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 22, 101461. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Domingo, E., et al. (2022). Backyard Livestock and Poultry Survey. Philippine Statistics Authority. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Dorafshan, M. M., Abedi-Koupai, J., Eslamian, S., & Amiri, M. J. (2023). Vetiver Grass (Chrysopogon zizanoides L.): A Hyper-Accumulator Crop for Bioremediation of Unconventional Water. Sustainability, 15(4), 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Elliott, H., Henry, L., & Welch, C. (2021). Influence of substrate and plant species in vertical helophyte filtration systems. Ecological Engineering, 164, 106261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Espaldon, V. O., Rebancos, C. M., & Perez, R. T. (2018). Waste management practices in piggery operations in the Philippines. Environmental Management and Sustainability Journal, 5(1), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Folino, A., Zema, D. A., Calabrò, P. S., & Zappia, G. (2020). Valorisation of swine wastewater through energy recovery and nutrient recycling: A review. Bioresource Technology, 297, 122–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122409 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. García, M. C., Santos, M. S., & Campos, J. R. (2017). Nutrient and organic matter removal in swine wastewater treatment systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 193, 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. García‑Valero, A., Acosta, J. A., Faz, Á., Gómez‑López, M. D., Carmona, D. M., Terrero, M. A., El Bied, O., & Martínez‑Martínez, S. (2024). Swine Wastewater Treatment System Using Constructed Wetlands Connected in Series. Agronomy, 14(1), 143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jenssen, P. D., Krogstad, T., & Muthusamy, M. (2019). Plant-based filtration systems for wastewater treatment: The role of helophytes. Ecological Engineering, 136, 156-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jeswani, H. K., & Azapagic, A. (2019). Water footprint: Methodologies and a case study for assessing the impacts of water use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1311–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lemke, M., Potthast, J., & Berndt, C. (2020). Helophyte-based wastewater treatment: Mechanisms and performance of vertical filtration systems. Environmental Management, 65(4), 476-487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Li, F., Qiu, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, X., & Xu, D. (2022). Performance and microbial mechanisms of vertical flow constructed wetlands treating livestock wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 301, 122722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122722 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Martin, T., Olesen, K., & Brix, H. (2019). Vertical helophytes filtration: A comparative study of system performance. Water Research, 157, 73-83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2020). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(9), 4869–4890. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4869-2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mexico Ministry of Agriculture / INIFAP. (2023). Mexico promotes technology for the treatment of waste from pig farms (INIFAP research project on biodigesters). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mulugeta, S., Helmreich, B., Drewes, J. E., & Nigussie, A. (2020). Consequences of fluctuating depth of filter media on coliform removal performance and effluent reuse opportunities of a bio-sand filter in municipal wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(5), 104135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nagarajan, D., Mariappan, N., Chen, C.-Y., Chen, J.-H., Dong, C.-D., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2025). Biological treatment of swine wastewater—Conventional methods versus microalgal processes. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 177, 105645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2024.105645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nazif, S., Naeeni, S. T., Akbari, Z., Fateri, S., & Moallemi, M. A. (2023). Development of data-driven models for the optimal design of multilayer sand filters for on-site treatment of greywater. Journal of Environmental Management, 348, 119241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Panja S, Sarkar D, Zhang Z, Datta R. (2021). Removal of Antibiotics and Nutrients by Vetiver Grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) from a Plug Flow Reactor Based Constructed Wetland Model. Toxics. 2021 Apr 15;9(4):84. doi: 10.3390/toxics9040084. PMID: 33921009; PMCID: PMC8071396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Philippine News Agency (PNA). (2020). African Swine Fever: Impact and mitigation efforts in the Philippines. PNA Online. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). (2021). Performance of Philippine agriculture. Retrieved from www.psa.gov.ph. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Pinho, A. L., da Silva, A., & Ferreira, R. (2022). Microbial communities in vertical helophytes filtration systems: Their role in contaminant removal. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(4), 2187-2198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Pongthornpruek, S. (2017). Swine Farm Wastewater Treatment by Constructed Wetland Planted with Vetiver Grass. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 15(2), 13–20. retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ennrj/article/view/87333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sajjad, M., Huang, Q., Khan, S., Nawab, J., Khan, M. A., Ali, A., Ullah, R., Kubar, A. A., Guo, G., Yaseen, M., & Sajjad, M. (2023). Methods for the removal and recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients from animal waste: A critical review. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 10, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sas, P., Redfern, R., & Upton, L. (2021). Green infrastructure for wastewater treatment: Environmental and economic benefits of helophytes. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Siedlecka, A., Sochacki, A., & Jabłońska, E. (2020). Integration of vertical helophytes filtration with activated carbon for efficient removal of micropollutants. Environmental Technology, 41(8), 1040-1050. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Singh, A., Gautam, K., & Agrawal, M. (2022). Sustainable wastewater remediation technologies for agricultural uses. In S. Varjani, A. Pandey, M. J. Taherzadeh, H. H. Ngo, & R. D. Tyagi (Eds.), Biomass, biofuels, biochemicals (pp. 153–179). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88511-9.00009-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Torrens, A., & Folch, M. (2020). Design and performance of an innovative hybrid constructed wetland for sustainable pig slurry treatment in small farms. Frontiers in Environmental Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., & Cóndor Golec, R. D. (2014). Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Vaishnav, S., Saini, T., Chauhan, A., Gaur, G. K., Tiwari, R., Dutt, T., & Tarafdar, A. (2023). Livestock and poultry farm wastewater treatment and its valorization for generating value-added products: Recent updates and way forward. Bioresource Technology, 382, 129170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129170 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Velasco, P. P. (2016). Use of vetiver grass for vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands for the DTRI-UPLB wastewater treatment. Report. 561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. https://www.ukdr.uplb.edu.ph/reports/561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Vu, T.L.A., Nguyen, T.N., Dang, T.H.T., Pham, H., Nguyen, Q.D., Ngo, T.T. H., & Tran, V.T. (2024). A snapshot of bacterial endophytes isolated from the roots of Vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) grown at Bien Hoa airbase, Dong Nai province. Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology/Science and Technology. https://tinyurl.com/4xvjw2a2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Vymazal, J. (2011). Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Five Decades of Experience. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(1), 61–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Wen, Y., Chen, Y., Zheng, N., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Nutrient dynamics and pollution potential of livestock wastewater: Implications for treatment and reuse. Agricultural Water Management, 191, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Zhou, J. (2017). Pollution characteristics and treatment of swine farm wastewater in China. Ecological Engineering, 104, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Zhang, Y., Singh, S., Bakshi, B. R., & Zou, G. (2020). Towards sustainable water management: Water footprint assessment of crop production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118566 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Zhao, L., Ma, J., & Zhang, Z. (2018). The potential of helophytes in wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 224, 37-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Zhou, L., Liang, M., Zhang, D., Niu, X., Li, K., Lin, Z., Luo, X., & Huang, Y. (2024). Recent advances in swine wastewater treatment technologies for resource recovery: A comprehensive review. Science of the Total Environment, 924, 171557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area