Efficiency of Estimator of Probability Proportional to Size with and without Replacement
Authors
Department of Statistics, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Department of Statistics, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Department of Statistics, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000167
Subject Category: Statistics
Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 2001-2015
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-12
Accepted: 2026-03-17
Published: 2026-04-11
Abstract
Efficiency refer to how well a sampling method extracts info from a population relative to effort /cost and method is efficient if it gives precise estimate with a small sample. Estimator is efficient if it has a low variance. This research focused on the efficiency of probability proportional to size sampling scheme estimators. Probability proportional to size with replacement, Hansen-Hurwitz estimator and Probability proportional to size without replacement, Rao-Hartley-Cochran estimator were compared in terms of estimation and efficiency. The empirical comparison of the population total, minimum variance and relative efficiency were used in assessing the efficiency. Probability proportional to size with replacement, (Hansen-Hurwitz) estimator had the higher population total estimate for some years indicating that population total differed by year. Probability proportional to size sampling without replacement estimator, (Rao–Hartley–Cochran) estimator thus had a smaller variance, hence more efficient performed better than the conventional Hansen–Hurwitz estimator in terms of variance reduction.
Keywords
Probability; Hansen-Hurwitz Estimator; Rao–Hartley–Cochran Estimator
Downloads
References
1. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Homa, Maurya, and Singh, 2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Horvitz, D. G., and Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 663–685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Johnson, P., Smith, R., and Allen, B. (2015). The Horvitz-Thompson estimator in educational attainment studies. Educational Statistics Quarterly, 27(1), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hughes, A., and Bennett, K. (2025). The Rao-Hartley-Cochran (RHC) method’s efficiency in estimating unemployment disparities across different demographic groups. Economic Analysis and Policy Journal, 48(1), 45-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. (Pamplona, 2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Net Relative Run-Ratio Method (NRRR), a Foolproof Technique to Replace the Net Run Rate (NRR) Method in Evaluating the Authority of Match-Wins
- Statistical Role of CB-SEM Vs PLS-SEM in the Field of Social Science
- Predictive Modelling and Statistical Analysis of Housing Prices in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Collocational Patterns of Guru in American Business vs. Spiritual Discourse
- A Comparative Analysis of Heuristic and Dynamic Algorithms for Route Optimization in Johor’s Delivery Hubs