Assessing and Enhancing Community Perception and Knowledge About the Endemic Rameshwaram Ornamental Tarantula Through Conservation Education

Conservation efforts are generally hindered by public misconceptions and negative perceptions toward spiders, especially for rare and endemic species. The critically endangered arboreal tarantula Poecilotheria hanumavilasumica, which is native to Rameswaram Island in India, is the focus of this study, which evaluates the effectiveness of conservation awareness initiatives conducted on the Island. Negative perceptions of the species usually arise from local people's fear, misconceptions, and misunderstandings of the facts. To address existing knowledge gaps and misconceptions, structured conservation awareness programmes were conducted across local communities, schools, and colleges at Rameswaram Island using both direct and indirect outreach methods. Through awareness-raising initiatives, 2,871 participants were directly reached, with additional indirect outreach achieved through the dissemination of educational materials and various community knowledge-sharing activities. To measure the efficacy of the awareness programmes, 402 school students aged 11–14 years who participated in a pre- and post-assessment survey were selected. The results showed a significant improvement in participants’ knowledge after the awareness interventions, with mean scores increasing from 7.25 (SD = 2.02) in the pre-test to 10.64 (SD = 2.52) in the post-test. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between pre- and post-assessment scores (t = 23.62, df = 401, p < 0.001), indicating a strong positive impact of the educational programmes. These results demonstrate how effectively environmental education programmes help dispel myths and foster positive perceptions of endangered species like Poecilotheria hanumavilasumica.

Conservation awareness; Environmental education

1. Aipanjiguly, S., Jacobson, S. K., & Flamm, R. O. (2002). Conserving manatees: Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions of boaters in Tampa Bay, Florida. Conservation Biology, 16(5), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01008.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Caro, T. M., Pelkey, N., Grigione, M., Irons, K., Campbell, K., Kelt, D., Burnett, J., Parsons, M., & Shih, K. (1994). Effects of conservation biology education on attitudes toward nature. Conservation Biology, 8(3), 846–852. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030846.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Daniel, B. A. (2012). Measurable impacts of HECx education programmes in HEC areas of Kanchanaburi, Thailand. Zoo’s Print, 27(3), 16–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Daniel, B. A., & Marimuthu, R. (2012). Human Elephant Coexistence teaching and educator skills training workshop: Nilgiri report. Zoo’s Print, 27(10), 14–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Daniel, B.A. (2014). Involving community, stakeholders and journalists for the conservation of Freshwater Biodiversity of Western Ghats. Zoo’s Print: 29(2), 11-16. (https://zoosprint.org/ind ex.php/zp/article/view/858) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, Jr., P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 20(2), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2003-00285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Howe, C., Obgenova, O., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of a public awareness campaign as a conservation intervention. Oryx, 46(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605311000030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2015). Conservation education and outreach techniques (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716686.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Meadows, D. H. (2011). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mehta, J. N., & Heinen, J. T. (2001). Does community-based conservation shape favourable attitudes among locals? Environmental Management, 28(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Monroe, M. C., Andrews, E., & Biedenweg, K. (2008). A framework for environmental education strategies. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 7(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150802058542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nanayakkara, R. P., Ganehiarachchi, G. A. S. M., Vishvanath, N., & Kusuminda, T. G. T. (2015). Discovery of the critically endangered tarantula species of the genus Poecilotheria (Araneae: Theraphosidae), Poecilotheria hanumavilasumica, from Sri Lanka. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 8(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2015.01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Siliwal, M., Molur, S., & Daniel, B.A. (2008). Poecilotheria hanumavilasumica. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. https://www.iucnredlist.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Smith, A (2004). Smith, A.M. 2004. A new species of the Arboreal Theraphosid, Genus Poecilotheria, from Southern India (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Theraphosidae) with notes on its Conservation Status. Journal of the British Tarantula Society 19(2): 3-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/publications/transforming-our-world-2030-agenda-sustainable-development-17981 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Washington, H., Baillie, J., Waterman, C., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2015a). A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of conservation attention at the species level. Oryx, 49(3), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605314000763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Washington, H., Taylor, B., Kopnina, H., Cryer, P., & Piccolo, J. J. (2015b). Education for biodiversity conservation. Pacific Conservation Biology, 21(4), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC15021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zjalic, D., Perilli, A., Nachira, L., Lombardi, G. S., & Cadeddu, C. (2024). PERSIST: a pre–post study to assess an educational methodology to enhance youth climate literacy and systems thinking ability. The Lancet Planetary Health, 8(Suppl 1), S7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00072-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area