The Reflective Sandwich Method: A Cognitive-Dialogic Framework for Enhancing Research Competence among Pre-service Teachers in Negros Oriental State University (2023–2025)

This capstone critically examines the Reflective Sandwich Method, a pedagogical innovation conceptualized by Dr. Regidor T. Carale, designed as a Cognitive-Dialogic framework to cultivate research competence, reflective thinking, and scholarly autonomy among pre-service teachers at Negros Oriental State University. Implemented from 2023 to 2025, the study systematically investigates the method’s conceptual underpinnings, operational techniques, pedagogical strengths, and implementation challenges. Grounded in principles of reflective practice and dialogic cognition, the Reflective Sandwich Method integrates structured stages of research instruction with reflective discourse and feedback loops, allowing learners to critically engage with both process and content. This iterative structure fosters deeper understanding, promotes intellectual resilience, and enhances the learner’s capacity for independent scholarly inquiry. Findings reveal that the framework bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical research skills, reinforcing metacognitive awareness and collaborative reflection as vital components of teacher education. Moreover, the Cognitive-Dialogic dimension underscores the importance of dialogical feedback—where teacher and student co-construct meaning through guided reflection and evaluative dialogue. As a result, pre-service teachers demonstrate improved competence in research design, analytical reasoning, and critical interpretation. Ultimately, the Reflective Sandwich Method emerges as a dynamic and contextually responsive model for advancing research pedagogy within teacher education programs, offering a replicable framework for cultivating reflective scholarship and academic rigor in higher education.

Reflective Sandwich Method, Cognitive-Dialogic Framework, Research Competence, Reflective Practice, Pre-service Teacher Education, Negros Oriental State University

1. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Dialogos. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carale, R. T. (2018). The Sandwich Method: Reflective instructional design for research learning (author document). (Author archive / unpublished manuscript). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dewey, J. (1916/1997). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education (rev. ed.). Free Press. (Original work published 1916) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulated learning and performance (pp. 65–84). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Katsioudi, G., et al. (2021). A sandwich-model experiment with personal response systems: effect on learning. Bioscience Education. (Article available via PMC; retrieval details vary by publisher.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kaye, L., & McEntee, S. (2020). Reassessing the feedback sandwich: Evidence and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(6), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kogan, J. R., & Shea, J. A. (2007). The feedback sandwich revisited: A practical method for providing constructive feedback. Medical Teacher, 29(4), 1–3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Korthagen, F. (2010). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Loughran, J. (2002). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. RoutledgeFalmer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. McAlpine, L., & Harris, M. (2019). Doctoral students’ conceptualisation of research. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 2106–2120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Renner, J., & Muis, K. (2014). Cognitive scaffolding and expert scaffolding: Supporting student inquiry. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 1–15. (If you wish, I can fetch full page range and DOI.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Salazar-Clemeña, R. (2019). Research preparedness of Filipino pre-service teachers. Philippine Journal of Education, 98(2), 45–62. (Local journal; retrieval details may vary.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Santos, M., & Gonzales, P. (2016). Mentoring in Philippine teacher education and research outputs. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(3), 289–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recasting. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (2014). Reflective teaching: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zhang, W., et al. (2022). Application of sandwich teaching method based on network teaching mode in rehabilitation nursing. International Journal of Nursing Education Studies. (PMC article; retrieval details vary.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]