AI Oversight in US Government: From Formal Policies to Functional Accountability

When artificial intelligence (AI) gained attention about ten years ago, its application in federal agencies has increased dramatically. Today, it is a vital tool for efficiency, security, and creativity across federal agencies, having begun as an experimental technology with few government applications. However, a big disconnect exists between stated policies and real supervision procedures due to the US government agencies' expanding usage of AI systems. By examining federal regulations, auditing instruments, and agency-specific procedures, this study seeks to determine how successful the US government's present AI supervision procedures are. The findings of this paper show that, although some agencies have been able to put the overview of artificial intelligence in place, other small agencies that do not have enough resources to fund the project or lack trained personnel to carry out the oversight lag behind. Drawing from case studies, policy documents, and academic research, this study spotlights challenges in guaranteeing accountability, weaknesses in enforcement, and limitations of the existing auditing processes. The research aims to support the creation and development of functional oversight mechanisms that fully preserve and safeguard the interests of the public while maintaining democratic ideals. This has been accomplished by developing tactics and best practices to increase accountability. By informing stakeholders and policymakers about the necessary adjustments to bridge the gap between AI governance practice and policy, the findings of this research will ultimately boost public trust in government AI applications.

artificial intelligence, government oversight

1. Anderson, A. J. (2025). What Is Disparate-Impact Discrimination? (IF13057) https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2022). Machine bias*. Ethics of Data and Analytics, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003278290-37 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Artificial Intelligence Research & Development Interagency Working Group. (2019). 2016–2019 PROGRESS REPORT: ADVANCING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE R&D. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/AI-Research-and-Development-Progress-Report-2016-2019.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Attard-Frost, B., Brandusescu, A., & Lyons, K. (2024). The governance of artificial intelligence in Canada: Findings and opportunities from a review of 84 AI governance initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biden White House Archives. (2024). FACT SHEET: OMB issues guidance to advance the responsible acquisition of AI in government. Office of Management and Budget. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/briefing-room/2024/10/03/fact-sheet-omb-issues-guidance-to-advance-the-responsible-acquisition-of-ai-in-government/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brantingham, P. J., Valasik, M., & Mohler, G. O. (2022). Does predictive policing lead to biased arrests? Results from a randomized controlled trial. Statistics and Public Policy, 5(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443x.2018.1438940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brookings Institution. (2025). Trump's executive orders politicize AI. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/trumps-executive-orders-politicize-ai/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cabinet Office. (2019). Society 5.0. Cao.go.jp. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Corbett-Davies, S., & Goel, S. (2018). The measure and mismeasure of fairness: A critical review of fair machine learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.00023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H., Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., & Tani, S. (2020). What Is Society 5.0? Society, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Deloitte. (2020). AI in Government: A Guide to Implementing AI Solutions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Homeland Security. (2023). Artificial intelligence use case inventory. https://www.dhs.gov/ai-use-cases [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Federal AI Compliance Plans for OMB Memorandum M-24-10. (2024). https://static.carahsoft.com/concrete/files/2317/3888/1325/Compliance_Federal_Agency_AI_OMB_M-24-10_Compliance_Plans.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Federal Register. (2023, October 30). Federal Register:: Request Access. Unblock.federalregister.gov.https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/01/2023-24283/safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Garvie, C., Bedoya, A., & Frankle, J. (2016). The Perpetual Line-Up: Unregulated Police Face Recognition in America. Upturn. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Government Accountability Office. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Agencies are implementing management and personnel requirements (GAO-24-107332). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-107332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Government Accountability Office. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Agencies have begun implementation but must complete key requirements (GAO-24-105980). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-105980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Government Accountability Office. (2025). Artificial intelligence: Generative AI use and management at federal agencies (GAO-25-107653). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107653 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hoadley, D. S., & Lucas, N. J. (2018). Artificial intelligence and national security. Congress. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R45178/R45178.3.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Home - AI Fairness 360. (2020, October 2). AI Fairness 360. http://ai-fairness-360.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Huergo, J. (2023, February 7). NIST calls for information to support safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence. https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2023/12/nist-calls-information-support-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kroll, J. A., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2017). Accountable Algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633–705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Office of Management and Budget. (2024). Memorandum M-24-10: Advancing governance, innovation, and risk management for agency use of artificial intelligence. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/M-24-10-Advancing-Governance-Innovation-and-Risk-Management-for-Agency-Use-of-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2023, November 1). Executive Order 14110: Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (Presidential Document). Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 210, 75191–... Federal RegisterGovInfo [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Olsen, H. P., Hildebrandt, T. T., Wiesener, C., Larsen, M. S., & Flügge, A. W. (2024). The right to transparency in public governance: Freedom of information and the use of artificial intelligence by public agencies. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 5(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3632753 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J., Breazeal, C., … & Wellman, M. (2019). Machine behaviour. Nature, 568(7753), 477–486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Robinson, S., & Wexler, J. (2019, July 19). Introducing the what-if tool for cloud AI platform models. Google Cloud Blog. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/introducing-the-what-if-tool-for-cloud-ai-platform-models [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Text - H.R.7532 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): Federal AI Governance and Transparency Act. (2023). Congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7532/text [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. The White House. (2024). Memorandum on Advancing the United States' Leadership in Artificial Intelligence; Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Fulfill National Security Objectives; and Fostering Artificial Intelligence's Safety, Security, and Trustworthiness. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2024/10/24/memorandum-on-advancing-the-united-states-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence-harnessing-artificial-intelligence-to-fulfill-national-security-objectives-and-fostering-the-safety-security/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. The White House. (2025). America's Action Plan. EOP. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. The White House. (2025, January 23). Removing barriers to American leadership in artificial intelligence. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Trump White House Archives. (2019). Artificial intelligence for the American people. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/ai/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. US Government Accountability Office. (2025). Generative AI Use and Management at Federal Agencies (GAO-25-107653). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107653 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. US Homeland Security. (2022). US Department of Homeland Security Annual Performance Report. Homeland Security. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/DHS%20FY21-23%20APR.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. White House. (2023). Executive Order 14110: Safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligence development and use. Federal Register, 88(219), 75191–75236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. White House. (2025). Executive Order: Removing barriers to American leadership in artificial intelligence. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors