Perceived Effectiveness and Barriers Influencing Blended Learning Implementation in Nursing Education: A Mixed Methods Study in Buea, Cameroon

Background: Despite growing recognition of blended learning benefits in nursing education, implementation in resource-constrained African contexts faces substantial barriers. Understanding perceived effectiveness and implementation challenges is essential for successful adoption in Cameroonian nursing schools.
Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted from December 2023 to July 2024 in three nursing institutions in Buea, Cameroon. The quantitative component recruited 385 nursing students and 90 instructors using multi-stage sampling, while the qualitative component involved purposive sampling of 12 class delegates. Structured questionnaires assessed perceived effectiveness and barriers, while semi-structured interviews explored implementation experiences. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 for quantitative analysis and thematic analysis for qualitative data. Chi-square tests determined associations between variables at p<0.05 significance.
Results: Among students, 373 (96.9%) perceived blended learning as effective for enhancing flexibility, 367 (95.3%) for improving access to learning materials, and 354 (91.9%) for developing technology skills. However, only 12(3.1%) perceived blended learning as effective for replacing face-to-face clinical instruction. Major barriers included internet connectivity issues (reported by 89.6% of students and 92.2% of instructors), electricity supply challenges (78.4% students, 85.6% instructors), inadequate technological resources (81.3% students, 88.9% instructors), insufficient technological literacy (63.6% students, 71.1% instructors), and instructor unwillingness to adopt new methods (52.7% students, 43.3% instructors). Qualitative findings revealed four major themes: infrastructure deficiencies, pedagogical concerns, resource limitations, and resistance to change. Chi-square analysis showed significant associations between perceived effectiveness and academic level (p=0.018), prior technology experience (p=0.003), and institutional affiliation (p=0.029).
Conclusion: While nursing students and instructors perceive blended learning as effective for enhancing flexibility and resource access, substantial barriers related to infrastructure, resources, and human capacity impede implementation. Successful blended learning adoption in Cameroonian nursing education requires comprehensive interventions addressing technological infrastructure, faculty development, resource provision, and institutional support systems.

Blended learning, Perceived Effectiveness

1. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Antwi, S., Osei-Poku, P., & Aidoo, A. (2021). Barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning at a university in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 45-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dewart, G., Corcoran, L., Thirsk, L., & Petrovic, K. (2020). Nursing education in a pandemic: Academic challenges in response to COVID-19. Nurse Education Today, 92, 104471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Duong, V. A., Nguyen, T. T., & Tran, T. (2012). Effectiveness of blended learning in teaching mathematics to Vietnamese students. Journal of Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 35(2), 45-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fozdar, B. I., Kumar, L. S., & Kannan, S. (2006). Study of the factors responsible for the dropouts from the BSc programme of Indira Gandhi National Open University. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Khalid, A. (2012). Factors and barriers influencing attitudes toward blended learning at Jazan University. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(3/4), 172-185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lwoga, E. (2014). Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning management systems in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10(1), 4-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 255-270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Challenges and instructors' intention to adopt and use open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 249-271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27-S31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. J. (2020). Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oducado, R. M., Rabacal, J., Moralista, R., & Tamdang, K. (2021). Perceived stress due to COVID-19 pandemic among employed professional teachers. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 305-316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533-544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2016). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rowe, M., Frantz, J., & Bozalek, V. (2012). The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: A systematic review. Medical Teacher, 34(4), e216-e221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Saovapa, W. (2018). Significant predictors for effectiveness of blended learning in a language course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 56-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e16504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Knowledge and Attitude of Undergraduate Nursing Students towards Organ Donation
• Cold Hip Bath Therapy for Labor Pain Management: A Review of Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Women's Health
• Work Settings Utilizing the S.C.O.R.E Model on the Psychological Empowerment of Hospital Nurses in Cebu City
• An Assessment on the Quality of Life of PLHIV Residents in Digos City Barangays: Basis for Health Teaching Program
• Work-Related Stress and Its Psychodermatological Impact on Nursing Professionals