Digital Governance, Participatory Planning, and Sustainable Urban Development: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Method Study in Emerging Philippine Cities

Rapid urbanization in emerging Philippine cities presents significant and complex challenges in infrastructure, governance practices, digital transformation, and citizen participation in promoting sustainable urban development. This study investigates the impact of governance frameworks, digital governance systems, and citizen participation on sustainable urban development using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected from 100 respondents, including local government officials, urban planners, and community members, and analyzed employing descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and regression analysis. Qualitative data from interviews were used to support and explain statistical findings. Results reveal that governance frameworks significantly predict sustainable urban development (β = 0.45, p < 0.01), followed by digital governance (β = 0.30, p < 0.01) and citizen participation (β = 0.25, p < 0.01), while governance structures are participatory and inclusive. The findings underscore the need for integrated governance approaches that combine institutional capacity, technological innovation, and inclusive citizen engagement.

Digital Governance; Urban Governance; Citizen Participation, Sustainable Cities; Philippines

1. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brillantes, A. B., & Fernandez, M. T. (2011). Restoring trust and building integrity in government. International Public Management Review, 12(2), 55–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. OECD. (2021). The governance of digital government: Driving digital transformation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4b5f5bb7-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. OECD. (2022). Digital government review of public sector innovation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7b6c8f6e-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Pelino, H. Y. B., & Protacio, A. (2026). Career stagnancy: A phenomenological inquiry into unpromoted teachers. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.54536/ajiri.v5i1.6990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pelino, H. Y. B. (2025). Managing risks in education: A qualitative study on risk management practices. Globus Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.46360/cosmos.ahe.520252006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pierre, J. (2011). The politics of urban governance. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sharifi, A. (2021). Urban sustainability assessment: An overview. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65, 102576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. United Nations. (2022). E-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Bank. (2022). World development report 2022: Finance for an equitable recovery. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1730-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark