The Preliminary Design of Ethylene Glycol Plant Using Coal Gasification

Authors

Abrar Muslim

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala (Indonesia)

Aula Chairunnisak

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala (Indonesia)

Ammar Munira

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala (Indonesia)

Indira Syam Hartono

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1304000159

Subject Category: Engineering

Volume/Issue: 13/4 | Page No: 1862-1869

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-06

Accepted: 2026-04-12

Published: 2026-05-11

Abstract

Indonesia possesses abundant coal reserves that can be utilized as an alternative feedstock for ethylene glycol (EG) production. This study presents the preliminary design of an EG plant based on a coal gasification route, offering an alternative to the conventional ethylene oxide hydration process. In this process, coal is converted into synthesis gas (syngas) via gasification, followed by syngas conditioning and catalytic conversion into ethylene glycol. The proposed plant has a production capacity of 50,000 tons per year and operates for 330 days annually, 24 hours per day.The plant is planned to be located in Separi Village, Tenggarong Seberang District, Kutai Kartanegara Regency, East Kalimantan Province, covering an area of 16,000 m². The organizational structure adopts a line-and-staff system with a total workforce of 149 employees. Water for the process is supplied from the Mahakam River, while electricity is provided by the State Electricity Company (PLN) and supported by an on-site generator with a capacity of 10,420 kW. Economic evaluation indicates that the project is financially feasible, with a pay-out time (POT) of 3.57 years, a break-even point (BEP) of 25.71%, and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 24.01%.

Keywords

Coal, gasification, ethylene glycol

Downloads

References

1. Damayanti, I., & Sunarno. (2021). Prarancangan Pabrik Etilen Glikol dari Etilen Oksida Dengan Proses Dow Meteor. Jom FTEKNIK, 8(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Haque, M. E., Tripathi, N., Palanki, S., Xu, Q., & Nigam, K. D. (2022). Plant-Wide Modeling and Economic Analysis of Monoethylene Glycol Production. Processes, 10(9), 1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amalia, R., Kurniawan, M. R., Salsabila, N. A., Rizkiana, M. F., Palupi, B., Mumtazah, Z., & Fachri, B. A. (2024). Prarancangan Pabrik Etilen Glikol dari Etilen Oksida dan CO₂ melalui Proses Karbonasi dengan Kapasitas 43.000 Ton/Tahun. Jurnal Tugas Akhir Teknik Kimia, 8(1), 1–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Afin, A. P., & Kiono, B. F. T. (2021). Potensi Energi Batubara serta Pemanfaatan dan Teknologinya di Indonesia Tahun 2020–2050: Gasifikasi Batubara. Jurnal Energi Baru & Terbarukan, 2(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.14710/jebt.2021.10446 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hapsari, C. A., Nurdrajat., Gani, R. M. G., & Wibisono, S. A. (2022). Karakteristik Batubara Pada Sumur Mk-02 Berdasarkan Analisis Proksimat, Ultimat, Dan Komposisi Maseral. Padjadjaran Geoscience Journal, 6(4), 967–972. https://doi.org/10.24198/pgj.v6i4.40929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Adji, S. P., Subandrio., Fadliah., Suliestyah., & Kurniawati, R. (2022). Optimization of coal quality improvement using the flotation method. Indonesian Mining and Energy Journal, 5(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.25105/imej.v5i1.13023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Wei, R., Yan, C., Yang, A., Shen, W., & Li, J. (2018). Improved process design and optimization of 200 kt/a ethylene glycol production using coal-based syngas. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 132, 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.02.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Data impor etilen glikol di Indonesia tahun 2019–2022. https://www.bps.go.id/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Wardati, H., Saputro, A. A., Putri, D. K., Amini, H. W., Rizkiana, M. F., Anggraini, R. A., & Mumtazah, Z. (2024). Pra Perancangan Pabrik Etilen Glikol dari Etilen Oksida dengan Kapasitas 55.000 Ton/Tahun. Jurnal Tugas Akhir Teknik Kimia, 7(1), 31–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Laela, D. A., & Hairunnisa. (2021). Prarancangan Pabrik Etilen Glikol dari Etilen Oksida dengan Proses Hidrasi Non-Katalitik Kapasitas 200.000 Ton/Tahun. Jurnal Tugas Akhir Teknik Kimia, 4(1), 19–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Huang, H., Cao, C., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Lv, J., & Xu, J. (2022). Model-Based Analysis for Ethylene Carbonate Hydrogenation Operation in Industrial-Type Tubular Reactors. Processes, 10(4), 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10040668 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Xu, S., Li, Z., Yang, Q., Chu, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, D., Zhou, H., & Gao, M. (2021). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Consumption, Pollutant Emission, and Cost Analysis of Coal/Oil/Biomass to Ethylene Glycol. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9(47), 15849–15860. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chu, G., Fan, Y., Zhang, D., Gao, M., Yu, J., Xie, J., & Yang, Q. (2022). A highly efficient and environmentally friendly approach for in-situ utilization of CO₂ from coal to ethylene glycol plant. Energy, 256, 124711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Yang, Q., Chu, G., Zhang, L., Zhang, D., & Yu, J. (2022). Pathways toward carbon-neutral coal to ethylene glycol processes by integrating with different renewable energy-based hydrogen production technologies. Energy Conversion and Management, 258, 115529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Giorgianni, G., Mebrahtu, C., Perathoner, S., Centi, G., & Abate, S. (2022). Hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate to ethylene glycol on Cu/SiO₂ catalysts prepared by a deposition-decomposition method: Optimization of the operating conditions and pre-reduction procedure. Catalysis Today, 390–391, 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2021.08.032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chen, K., Wang, H., Luo, X., Li, J., Xu, Y., Meng, Q., He, H., Xu, J., & Huang, G. (2025). Recent advances in high-performance Cu/SiO₂ catalysts for hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate to ethylene glycol. Chemical Engineering Science, 313, 121761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2025.121761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Yang, J., Lin, L., Zhang, P., Ye, R., Wang, Y., Qin, Y., Zhou, Z., & Yao, Y.-G. (2023). Facile and Optimized Ion-Exchange Method for Synthesizing Low-Cost and Stable Cu/SiO₂ Catalyst for Hydrogenation of Dimethyl Oxalate to Ethylene Glycol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(37), 14866–14878. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ai, P., Jin, H., Niu, J., Huang, W., & Tan, M. (2023). Ultra-stable Cu-based catalyst for dimethyl oxalate hydrogenation to ethylene glycol. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 60, 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2023.06.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhou, Y., Xu, Z., Zhang, J., Xing, J., Jia, J., & Cui, P. (2023). Development and techno-economic evaluation of coal to ethylene glycol process and Allam power cycle and carbon capture and storage and integration process. Fuel, 332, 126121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Balyani, K. M. F., Ibrahim, E., Bahrin, D., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Pemilihan Jenis Reaktor Gasifikasi Batubara Aceh Barat dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Pertambangan, 7(3), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.25077/jp.7.3.101-110.2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kumar, A., Sharma, P., & Singh, R. (2024). Strategic insights in manufacturing site selection: a multi-method approach using factor rating, analytic hierarchy process, and best worst method. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 10, 1392543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2024.1392543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Towler, G., & Sinnott, R. (2022). Chemical engineering design: Principles, practice and economics of plant and process design (3rd ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-04487-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Crini, G., & Lichtfouse, E. (2019). Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 17(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0785-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sarpong, G., & Gude, V. G. (2021). Transitioning wastewater treatment plants toward circular economy and energy sustainability. ACS Omega, 6(18), 11794–11803. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c05827 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Singh, B. J., Chakraborty, A., & Sehgal, R. (2023). A systematic review of industrial wastewater management: Evaluating challenges and enablers. Journal of Environmental Management, 348, 119230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Basheer, A. A. (2018). Industrial wastewater treatment by novel organic flocculants: Kinetics and thermodynamics. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 263, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Makhyarini, I., & Normalina. (2021). Prarancangan Pabrik Bioethanol dari Tetes Tebu dengan Proses Fermentasi Kapasitas 37.000 Ton/Tahun. Jurnal Tugas Akhir Teknik Kimia, 3(2), 1–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles