Ethical Challenges in Adoption of AI in Financial Services: A Conceptual Framework

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into financial services has transformed how institutions operate, assess risk, and engage with customers. While AI enhances efficiency, reduces costs, and supports financial inclusion, it also raises significant ethical concerns. This study develops a conceptual understanding of these challenges, focusing on key issues such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, data privacy, accountability, and their implications for trust and financial stability. Adopting a conceptual research design, the study synthesises recent literature to examine how ethical risks emerge across different stages of the AI lifecycle, from data collection to deployment and monitoring. Through thematic analysis, a multi-dimensional framework is proposed, integrating ethical risk dimensions, lifecycle stages, and governance mechanisms. The study also advances a set of propositions linking ethical factors with outcomes such as user trust, perceived risk, and AI adoption. The findings reveal that ethical challenges are highly interconnected, with fairness and transparency playing a central role in shaping trust and acceptance. The study highlights the importance of governance mechanisms, including explainable AI and ethical oversight, in mitigating risks. Overall, the research provides a foundation for responsible and sustainable AI adoption in financial services.

Artificial Intelligence in Financial Services, AI Ethics

1. Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amoako, G. K., Omari, P., Kumi, D. K., & Agbemabiase, G. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence and entrepreneurial decision-making: A conceptual framework. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech, RegTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37(3), 371–414. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol37/iss3/2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bahlool, R., Hewahi, N., & Elmedany, W. (2026). Performance, fairness, and explainability in AI-based credit scoring: A systematic literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(2), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19020104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning. MIT Press. https://fairmlbook.org/pdf/fairmlbook.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Boukherouaa, E. B., AlAjmi, K., Deodoro, J., Farias, A., & Ravikumar, R. (2021). Powering the digital economy: Opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence in finance. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/dp/2021/english/pdeoraifea.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chang, C.-Y., Park, S., & Dinh, M. C. (2026). Advice by algorithms: Dual dimensions of trust in AI financial service adoption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 88, Article 104537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chia, F. C. (2025). Philosophical foundations of artificial intelligence in project management. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5382294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chopra, P. (2024). Ethical implications of AI in financial services: Bias, transparency, and accountability. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology, 10(5), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT241051017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Černevičienė, J., Kabašinskas, A. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in finance: a systematic literature review. Artif Intell Rev 57, 216 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10854-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12549.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Danielsson, J., Macrae, R., Uthemann, A., & Zigrand, J. P. (2022). Artificial intelligence, financial risk management and systemic risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 140, 106290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., Medaglia, R., Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K., Le Meunier-FitzHugh, L. C., Misra, S., Mogaji, E., Sharma, S. K., Singh, J. B., Raghavan, V., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Samothrakis, S., Spencer, J., Tamilmani, K., Tubadji, A., Walton, P., & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/AI-Act-FullText.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Ramadorai, T., & Walther, A. (2022). Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. The Journal of Finance, 77(1), 5–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fundira, M., Mbohwa, C. AI ethics in banking services: a systematic and bibliometric review of regulatory and consumer perspectives. Discov Artif Intell 5, 319 (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00432-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ comment: So, what is a conceptual paper? Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115576425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gomber, P., Koch, J. A., & Siering, M. (2018). Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2019). A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5), 1–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hurley, M., & Adebayo, J. (2017). Credit scoring in the era of big data. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 18, 148–216. https://openyls.law.yale.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/a8c7f4e3-ae53-4c43-b6cd-1223a5703c32/content. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kambalapadavu,R. , Shrinivas,S. Kumar, Sharia,A. and Shetty,P. (2026). Generative AI as a Collaborative Partner in Entrepreneurial Creativity: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Business, Communication & Technology, 1-15. 10.56632/bct.2026.5105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Malali, N. (2025). AI ethics in financial services: A global perspective. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(2). 10.5281/zenodo.14881349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. OECD. (2019). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Oyasiji, O., Okesiji, A., Imediegwu, C., & Elebe, O. (2023). Ethical AI in financial decision-making: Transparency, bias, and regulation. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology, 9(5), 453–471. https://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT239077. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Radanliev, P. (2025). Artificial intelligence and ethical frameworks in finance. AI & Society. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1561776/full. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Saheb, T., & Jamthe, S. (2022). Developing a conceptual framework for identifying ethical repercussions of artificial intelligence. Journal of AI, Robotics & Workplace Automation, 1(4), 371–398. https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/airwa0/y2022v1i4p371-398.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Saxena, R. (2022). A conceptual framework for assessing the application of artificial intelligence for financial reporting. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(5), 897–911. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2022.100503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Shrinivas,S. Kumar, Shetty,P. , Sophia,J. and Gnanakumar,M. (2025). AI as a Systemic Risk Amplifier in High-Frequency Trading: Presenting a Conceptual Regulatory Framework. Journal of Business, Communication & Technology, 4(2), 58-67. 10.56632/bct.2025.4205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. https://pbio.akademia.mil.pl/wp-content/scans/2024/CYBERBEZPIECZENSTWO/OCR/26778_III_OCR.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wang, Y. (2024). Ethical considerations of AI in financial decision-making. Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59400/cai.v2i1.1290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yang, Q. (2024). Ethical AI in financial inclusion: The role of algorithmic fairness on user satisfaction and recommendation. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(9), 105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8090105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Yeo, W.J., Van Der Heever, W., Mao, R. et al. A comprehensive review on financial explainable AI. Artif Intell Rev 58, 189 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11077-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. (2020). Regulating a revolution: From regulatory sandboxes to smart regulation. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 23(1), 31–103. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl/vol23/iss1/2/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Zimmermann, F., Coimbra, M. E., & Durst, S. (2020). A conceptual framework for transparency in financial technology. In F. Teuteberg & M. Hempel (Eds.), Transparency in FinTech (pp. 15–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03523-3_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition