Developmental Evaluation in Complex Governance Systems: Learning and Adaptation in Policy Implementation

This paper discussed how Developmental Evaluation (DE) may be used to improve the responsiveness and resource distribution by governance in Nairobi County, Kenya. The objective of the research was to evaluate how DE can be effective in improving policy flexibility, resource allocation, and economic sustainability of the governance systems in Nairobi. The paper also cited impediments of DE implementation whereby political opposition and institutional inertia were identified as the barriers to the efficiency of DE. The research was based on the Systems Theory which stipulated that complex systems such as the urban governance system needed feedback and lifelong learning in order to adjust. The mixed-method strategy was adopted and entailed a combination of quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews using 100 respondents who were government officials, policymakers, and DE experts. The results showed that DE was far more effective in terms of governance responsiveness, with 72 percent of the respondents agreeing that quicker adjustments in policies could be made with the help of real time feedback. On the same note, DE strengthened the allocation of resources, with three-quarters of the respondents claiming to have increased efficiency in allocation of resources. Nevertheless, the issues of inter-sectoral coordination inhibited the maximum potential of DE, as 60 percent of the respondents have indicated. The major barriers to the implementation of DE were political resistance and institutional barriers with 62 percent and 59 percent of the respondents indicating the same respectively. Nevertheless, DE yielded positive results in the long-term governance and 68 percent of the respondents affirmed its long-term effect. The research highlighted the necessity of capacity-building and political commitment to the need to overcome such barriers in making DE successful in the long term. It was concluded that DE had a huge potential of enhancing governance in Nairobi but it needed more institutional structures, cross-sector partnership, and continued training in order to maximise its advantages. The research suggested the inclusion of DE in policy-making and strengthening of community involvement to achieve the best in governance in Nairobi.

Developmental Evaluation (DE), Governance Responsiveness, Resource Allocation, Nairobi County, Political Resistance

1. Ajulor, O. V. (2018). The Challenges of Policy Implementation in Africa and Sustainable Development Goals. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 1497–1518. Link [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amboko, B. (2025). Evaluating the impact, implementation experience, and political economy of the Primary Care Networks reform in Kenya. BMC Health Policy and Systems, 23(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-024-01273-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bailie, J., Beer, T., Stid, D., & Armstrong, K. (2023). Using developmental evaluation to support adaptive strategies: An application from a social change initiative. Evaluation Innovation. Retrieved from https://www.evaluationinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/oxford_developmental_evaluation.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beauchamp, E., Leiter, T., Pringle, P., Brooks, N., Masud, S., & Guerdat, P. (2024). Toolkit for monitoring, evaluation, and learning for national adaptation plan processes. NAP Global Network. Retrieved from https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/napgn-en-2024-mel-toolkit-nap-processes.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cheng, A. T. (2024). A Study on Taiwan as a Developmental State in Transition: Exploring Bottom-Up Evaluation without Indicators. Science and Public Policy, 51(2), 234–245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Coman, J., Beer, T., Stid, D., & Armstrong, K. (2023). Using developmental evaluation to support adaptive strategies: An application from a social change initiative. Oxford Handbooks Online. Retrieved from https://www.evaluationinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/oxford_developmental_evaluation.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Conklin, J., et al. (2015). Developmental Evaluation as a Strategy to Enhance the Implementation of Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines for Deprescribing in Primary Care and Long-Term Care Settings. Implementation Science, 10(1), 111. Link [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Controller of Budget. (2024). County Governments Budget Implementation Review Report for the First Half of FY 2024/25. Retrieved from https://cob.go.ke/download/county-governments-budget-implementation-review-report-the-first-half-of-fy-2024-25/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Developmental Evaluation of Catalyzing Good Food Through School Feeding Programs. (2025). World Food Programme. Retrieved from https://www.wfp.org/publications/developmental-evaluation-catalyzing-good-food-through-school-feeding-programs-november [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Drossman, H. (2024). An iterative adaptive developmental evaluation framework. Evaluation and Program Planning. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504622.2023.2286937 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fagbemi, F. (2021). Interconnections between Governance and Socioeconomic Conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Global Health Action, 14(1), 1931674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Goodwin, S. (2025). Revisiting the challenges to monitoring, evaluation, and learning for adaptation. ScienceDirect. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125002151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Haag, M., Hurka, S., & Kaplaner, C. (2024). Policy Complexity and Implementation Performance in the European Union. ResearchGate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV). (2023). Evaluation Week 2022: Banking on the people of Africa: Improving human and social development. African Development Bank Group. Retrieved from https://idev.afdb.org/en/page/book-parent-page/evaluation-week-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Independent Evaluation Office (IEO). (2022). UNDP Annual Report on Evaluation 2022. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2025-02/undp-are-2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ioannides, I., & Eisele, K. (2023). Assessing Policy Coherence for Development across Internal and External EU Policies. European Parliamentary Research Service. Link [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Iyamu, I. (2022). Developmental evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic. PMC National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9379587/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA). (2022). Kenya National Monitoring and Evaluation Policy. Retrieved from https://repository.kippra.or.ke/items/d290c062-30b8-4fe5-aa37-300ea73ebc7a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA). (2022). Kenya National Monitoring and Evaluation Policy. Retrieved from https://repository.kippra.or.ke/items/d290c062-30b8-4fe5-aa37-300ea73ebc7a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA). (2025). Capacity-building workshop on Public Policy Making Process and Monitoring and Evaluation in 14 Counties. Retrieved from https://kippra.or.ke/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). (2024). Gross County Product – 2024. Retrieved from https://www.knbs.or.ke/reports/gross-county-product-2024/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kolt, N. (2025). Lessons from complex systems science for AI governance. ScienceDirect. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666389925001898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Konyango, T. O. (2019). Influence of Governance on Public Policy Implementation in Kenya. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mardiyanta, A., et al. (2022). Policy Capacity during COVID-19 in Asia: A Systematic Review. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 18(3), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. May, C. K., et al. (2022). Complex adaptive governance systems: A framework to guide policy evaluation. Policy Sciences. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42532-021-00101-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mugwagwa, J., Edwards, D., & de Haan, S. (2015). Assessing the Implementation and Influence of Policies that Support Research and Innovation Systems for Health: The Cases of Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania. Health Research Policy and Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mutuse, E. M. (2016). Enhancing Good Governance Under Kenya’s Devolved System: A Case Study of Machakos County. University of Nairobi. Link [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nairobi City County Government. (2023). Nairobi City County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP) 2023–2027. Retrieved from https://nairobiassembly.go.ke/ncca/wp-content/uploads/paperlaid/2023/NAIROBI-CITY-COUNTY-INTEGRATED-DEVELOPMENT-PLAN-FOR-2023-2027-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nairobi City County Government. (2023). Nairobi City County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP) 2023–2027. Retrieved from https://nairobiassembly.go.ke/ncca/wp-content/uploads/paperlaid/2023/NAIROBI-CITY-COUNTY-INTEGRATED-DEVELOPMENT-PLAN-FOR-2023-2027-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Njuguna, L., Uri, I., & Beauchamp, E. (2024). National monitoring, evaluation, and learning systems for climate change adaptation: A comparative analysis of nine countries. IISD. Retrieved from https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2024-07/monitoring-evaluation-learning-systems-adaptation.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. OECD (2023). Evaluation systems in development co-operation 2023. OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/12/evaluation-systems-in-development-co-operation-2023_1c369b8a/a255365e-en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Otieno, D. O. (2025). The Happening of Kenya’s National Evaluation Policy. Virginia Tech. Link [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Pelletier, D., et al. (2017). Boundary-Spanning Actors in Complex Adaptive Systems: A Case Study from Four Sub-Saharan African Countries. Global Health Action, 10(1), 1334022. Link [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Schmidt, E. K. (2023). Creating a Developmental Framework for Evaluating Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Implementation in Research Organizations. Science and Public Policy, 50(5), 1026–1037. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Serpe, L. (2022). Nimble adaptation: Tailoring monitoring, evaluation, and learning systems in complex international development environments. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ev.20523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sitienei, J., et al. (2018). The Implementation of Governance Attributes in Health in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. BMC Health Services Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. UNICEF. (2022). Evaluation reports. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/evaluation/reports [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). Kenya Country Programme Document 2022–2026. Retrieved from https://erc.undp.org/api/download?filePath=%2Fdocuments%2FEvaluationPlans%2F1607%2FKEN_CPDEvalPlan_Kenya_June2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2022). Africa Sustainable Development Report 2022. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. Retrieved from https://www.uneca.org/publications/africa-sustainable-development-report-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2022). Formative Evaluation of the Regional Program for Latin America and the Caribbean (2022–2025). UNFPA. Retrieved from https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/EN-Evaluacio%CC%81n%20Formativa%20del%20Programa%20Regional%20para%20Ame%CC%81rica%20Latina%20y%20el%20Caribe%20%282022-2025%29.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Waweru, P. N., & Mangana, R. (2024). Influence of strategic plan implementation on performance of regulatory institutions in Nairobi City County. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 13(3), 1–15. Retrieved from https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/article/view/2894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Waweru, P. N., & Mangana, R. (2024). Influence of strategic plan implementation on performance of regulatory institutions in Nairobi City County. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 13(3), 1–15. Retrieved from https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/article/view/2894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. World Bank. (2022). Impact Evaluation in International Development. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/dd5a1c37-56a7-5b90-a1f9-508e7a3a7632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. World Bank. (2022). Impact Evaluation in International Development. World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/dd5a1c37-56a7-5b90-a1f9-508e7a3a7632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. World Bank. (2022). Results and Performance of the World Bank Group 2022. Independent Evaluation Group. Retrieved from https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/evaluations/results-and-performance-world-bank-group-2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Innovations in Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Project Tracking: Applying Global Best Practices in Nairobi
• AI-Driven Monitoring and Evaluation: The Future of Transparent and Accountable Governance in Public Project Implementation
• Big Data and Citizen Feedback Analytics in Monitoring Public Service Performance