Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare in a Changing Global Economy
Authors
Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Economics, Government Arts and Science College, Mettur, Salem (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1304000253
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 13/4 | Page No: 2987-2998
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-28
Accepted: 2026-05-03
Published: 2026-05-20
Abstract
Economic growth is more accurately measured using real GDP per capita, as it reflects changes in income levels adjusted for population and inflation. While total GDP captures the size of an economy, it does not adequately represent individual economic well-being. However, contemporary global challenges—including inequality, environmental degradation, and declining subjective well-being—have revealed its conceptual and empirical limitations. This paper critically evaluates GDP as a welfare measure and examines alternative frameworks such as the Human Development Index (HDI), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). Through empirical comparisons and theoretical analysis, the study demonstrates that GDP growth often diverges from improvements in human welfare. Using cross-country data patterns, the paper highlights how welfare outcomes depend not only on income but also on distribution, social infrastructure, and sustainability. The study argues for a multidimensional measurement framework and recommends policy integration of broader welfare indicators into economic planning.
Keywords
GDP, welfare economics, HDI, inequality, sustainability
Downloads
References
1. Alkire, Sabina, and James Foster. “Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement.” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 95, nos. 7–8, 2011, pp. 476–487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Costanza, Robert, et al. “The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital.” Nature, vol. 387, no. 6630, 1997, pp. 253–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Costanza, Robert, et al. “Time to Leave GDP Behind.” Nature, vol. 505, no. 7483, 2014, pp. 283–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. International Labour Organization. World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024. ILO, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. OECD (2020) – Better Life Index / Well-being framework [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer, Harvard UP, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. Oxford UP, 1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Stiglitz, Joseph E., Amartya Sen, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. United Nations Development Programme. Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2023. UNDP, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier—Human Development and the Anthropocene. UNDP, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. World Bank (2022) – World Development Indicators / welfare [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria