Implementation and Deployment of an Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Fingerprint Attendance Monitoring System for Evaluating Students’ Academic Performance: A Pilot Study at Moshood Abiola Polytechnic, Abeokuta, Nigeria.

This study reports the development and pilot evaluation of an Internet-of-Things (IoT)-based fingerprint attendance system at Moshood Abiola Polytechnic, Abeokuta, Nigeria. The system was designed to automate attendance monitoring and investigate its relationship with students’ academic performance, thereby addressing the inefficiencies and susceptibility to manipulation associated with manual roll-call methods. By integrating biometric fingerprint authentication with real-time cloud-based data storage, the system ensured accurate, secure, and tamper-resistant attendance records. The implementation was carried out over one academic semester across three engineering departments (Computer Engineering, Electrical/Electronics, and Mechanical Engineering), involving two hundred (200) students and ten (10) academic staff. Attendance data were captured using IoT-enabled fingerprint devices, while academic performance indicators were derived from quizzes, assignments, and examinations. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics alongside inferential techniques, including Pearson correlation, linear regression, and one-way ANOVA. The results revealed mean attendance rates of 85.4%, 78.2%, and 92.1% across the respective departments, with corresponding average academic scores of 75.6%, 68.3%, and 81.2%. A statistically significant and strong positive correlation (p = 0.001) was observed between attendance and academic performance. Regression analysis further established attendance as a significant predictor of academic outcomes, while ANOVA findings indicated that students with high attendance accounted for a substantial proportion (71.3%) of performance variance. In conclusion, the system significantly improved student engagement and established a reliable linkage between attendance and academic outcomes, thereby strengthening academic accountability. Although minor network and device-related constraints were encountered, the results offer a solid basis for extended validation across diverse, multi-institutional educational environments.

Internet of Things (IoT), fingerprint authentication, attendance monitoring

1. Adenekan, O. A., Sodunke, M. A., Olateju, A. I., & Bello, O. (2021). Weather variables monitoring system with a developed graphical user interface using Internet of Things. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology, 8(3), 55–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adeyemi, T. O. (2011). The impact of students’ attendance on academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 3(6), 78 – 85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmed, M., Mahmud, S., & Rahman, M. (2017). Biometric-based attendance management system for educational institutions. International Journal of Computer Applications, 162(3), 1 – 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(4), 2347 – 2376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Credé, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta‐analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272 – 295. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319 – 340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jain, A. K., Ross, A., & Prabhakar, S. (2004). An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 14(1), 4 – 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Maltoni, D., Maio, D., Jain, A. K., & Prabhakar, S. (2009). Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition (2nd ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mukhopadhyay, S., Dutta, A., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2015). Fingerprint-based biometric attendance system using a microcontroller. International Journal of Computer Applications, 120(16), 12 – 16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Oghuvbu, E. P. (2010). Attendance and academic performance of students in secondary schools in Delta State, Nigeria. Studies on Home and Community Science, 4(1), 21 – 25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Patil, P., & Patil, S. (2021). IoT-based fingerprint attendance monitoring system using Raspberry Pi. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(4), 415 – 421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ray, P. P. (2018). A survey on Internet of Things architectures. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 30(3), 291 – 319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ramgopal, A., Jothi, K. J., Godson, S., Jeimen, M. A., et al. (2025). IoT-enabled fingerprint biometric attendance system for secure and real-time student monitoring. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 9(3), 147–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rodgers, J. R. (2001). A panel-data study of the effect of student attendance on university performance. Australian Journal of Education, 45(3), 284 – 295. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sharma, P., Gupta, S., & Sharma, R. (2016). RFID-based smart attendance system. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 6(5), 256 – 259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Singh, A., Kumar, V., & Singh, R. (2020). Cloud-based facial recognition attendance monitoring system. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 9(4), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yadav, R., Sharma, A., & Singh, P. (2019). Cloud-based biometric attendance system using IoT technologies. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 8(6), 112 – 116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet