Lexical Error Patterns in L2 Writing: Evidence from English Majors at a University in Vietnam

Academic writing has always been a challenge for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, particularly at the tertiary level where lexical accuracy and appropriateness are essential. Among the most recurring difficulties, lexical errors emerge as indicators of gaps in vocabulary knowledge and instability within learners’ interlanguage systems. Despite growing interest in L2 writing, relatively few studies have examined lexical errors in authentic, school-based contexts. This study investigates patterns of lexical errors in a learner corpus comprising 40 argumentative essays written by English majors at a public university in Vietnam. Adopting a descriptive, corpus-based approach, the analysis draws on a taxonomy adapted from Llach (2005), categorizing errors into semantic, syntactic, orthographic, and pragmatic types, with further distinction between interlingual and intralingual influences. The findings reveal that orthographic errors are the most prevalent, and that intralingual errors significantly outnumber those attributable to L1 transfer. These patterns indicate that learners’ difficulties are primarily developmental, reflecting incomplete lexical representations and unstable form-meaning mappings. The results further point to limited consolidation of word forms, morphological patterns, and context-appropriate usage. These findings highlight the need for pedagogical approaches that prioritize lexical stability through systematic vocabulary instruction with emphasis on morphological awareness, orthographic regularities, and contextualized lexical repertoire. Addressing these underlying dimensions of lexical competence may contribute to reducing recurrent errors and enhancing both the accuracy and fluency of academic writing in EFL contexts.

lexical errors, EFL context, taxonomy of lexical errors, academic writing

1. Bestgen, Y. (2017). Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness and formulaic competence. System, 69, 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bestgen, Y. & S. Granger (2018). Tracking L2 writers’ phraseological development using collgrams: Evidence from a longitudinal EFL corpus. In Hoffmann, S., Sand, A., Arndt-Lappe, S. & Dillmann, L.M. (eds.) Corpora and Lexis. Brill, 277-301. https://brill.com/abstract/title/36203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boers, F. (2021). Evaluating second language vocabulary and grammar instruction: A synthesis of the research on teaching words, phrases, and patterns. First Ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003005605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cordero, D., & Arguedas, V. N. (2020). Lexical errors in EFL students’ written production. Letras, 175–198. https://doi.org/10.15359/rl.2-68.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808330883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Do, N. H. M., & Le, Q. T. (2023). Lexical collocation errors in essay writing: A study into Vietnamese EFL students and their perceptions. International Journal of Language Instruction, 2(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.23226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ferris, D. (1995). Can advanced ESL students become effective self-editors? CATESOL Journal, 8(1), 41-62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Flowerdew, L. (2004). The argument for using English for Specific Purposes (ESP) corpora in ESP vocabulary research. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 11-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fogal, G. G., & Verspoor, M. H. (Eds.). (2020). Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 writing development. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2020). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2015). Electronic corpora and learner corpus research. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 145-159). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Guo, Q. (2022). Interlanguage and its implications to second language teaching and learning. Pacific International Journal, 5(4), 08–14. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v5i4.223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hinkel, E. (2020). Teaching Academic L2 Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429437946 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hoang, V. V. (2020). The Roles And Status Of English In Present-Day Vietnam: A Socio-Cultural Analysis. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(1). doi:10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2014). Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 757-786. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Le, T. A., & Trinh, N. T. (2025). A student-centered framework for understanding EFL thesis writing difficulties in Vietnam. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(11), 1-20. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/14690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Le, T. G. C., & Ta, T. T. A. (2010). A study on lexical bundles in English and Vietnamese scientific writing. The University of Danang - The University of Foreign Language Studies. Unpublished Master Thesis. https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lennon, P. (2009). Error and the very advanced learner. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(1), 31-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lieber, R. (2021). Introducing morphology. Third Edition. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Llach, M. D. P. A. (2005). The relationship of lexical error and their types to the quality of ESL compositions: An empirical study. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (3), 45-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Manchón, R. M., & Polio, C. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nguyen, A. N., & Vu, T. V. (2024). Typical linguistic errors committed by tertiary students in legal written outputs. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 11(2), 120-141. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2024.11.2.ngu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 130-149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Quinn, C. C. (2020). L2 writers referencing corpora to address accuracy: A qualitative analysis of learners' lexicogrammatical error corrections [Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham]. UBIRA ETheses. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/11084/1/Quinn2020PhD.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Selinker, L. (2009). INTERLANGUAGE. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1-4), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tran, T. T. (2021). An analysis of lexical collocation errors in academic IELTS writing task 2 by Vietnamese students in an English center [Master’s thesis, Dalat University]. Dalat University Institutional Repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13-40. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhang, X. (2022). The relationship between lexical use and L2 writing quality: A case of two genres. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 371-396. DOI:10.1111/ijal.12420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Zimmermann, R. (1986). Classification and distribution of lexical errors in the written work of German learners of English. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 21, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests